Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Real options approach to explore the effect of organizational change on IoT development project

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emerging information technology of internet of things (IoT) has caught much attention from both theoretical research and production practice. The application of IoT in manufacturing industry can dramatically improve business process efficiency and promote organizational performance. However, firms tend to hesitate in the investment decisions, which poses great challenges to the IoT application progress. Besides the investment nature of long cycle and high risk, the “organizational factors” are also non-ignorable. A general organizational change model is first refined according to the organizational change of Jianghuai Auto Company when applying IoT. Based on the binomial lattice tree framework, we propose a two-stage real options model to solve the optimal investment problems in both stages of internal pilot and product life-cycle management (PLM) expansion. Investment costs and future benefits are considered to investigate the promoting effect of organizational factors in project implementation. This paper demonstrates the internal causes and significances of organizational change for IoT development project, which is also theoretically meaningful for explanation of real options approach in organizational area.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hvistendahl, M.: China pushes the ‘Internet of Things’. Science 336, 1223–1223 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lim, M.K., Bahr, W., Leung, S.C.H.: RFID in the warehouse: a literature analysis (1995–2010) of its applications, benefits, challenges and future trends. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 145, 409–430 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Stratopoulos, T., Dehning, B.: Does successful investment in information technology solve the productivity paradox? Inform. Manage-Amster. 38, 103–117 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Qiang, Y., Lanli, Y., Lan, Z.: Relationship between IoT and economic growth: from an investment perspective. China. Commun. 8, 126–131 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang, C., Dhaliwal, J.: An investigation of resource-based and institutional theoretic factors in technology adoption for operations and supply chain management. Int. J. Prod. Econ. 120, 252–269 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Challis, D., Samson, D., Lawson, B.: Impact of technological, organizational and human resource investments on employee and manufacturing performance: Australian and New Zealand evidence. Int. J. Prod. Res. 43, 81–107 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dunbar, R.L.M., Starbuck, W.H.: Learning to design organizations and learning from designing them. Organ. Sci. 17, 171–178 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ramezan, M.: Intellectual capital and organizational organic structure in knowledge society: how are these concepts related? Int. J. Inform. Manage. 31, 88–95 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang, Q., Davison, R.M., Gu, J.: Impact of personal and cultural factors on knowledge sharing in China. Asia. Pac. J. Manag. 25, 451–471 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Jacobs, G., Van, W.A., Christe-Zeyse, J.: A theoretical framework of organizational change. J. Organ. Change. Manag. 26, 772–792 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fernandes, R., Gouveia, B., Pinho, C.: A real options approach to labour shifts planning under different service level targets. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 231, 182–189 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Wamba, S.F., Chatfield, A.T.: A contingency model for creating value from RFID supply chain network projects in logistics and manufacturing environments. Eur. J. Inform. Syst. 18, 615–636 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Lin, C.Y., Ho, Y.H.: An empirical study on the adoption of RFID technology for logistics service providers in China. Int. Bus. Res. 2, 23–36 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Strüker, J., Gille, D.: RFID adoption and the role of organizational size. Bus. Process Manag. J. 16, 972–990 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sower, V.E., Abshire, R.D.: Radio frequency identification technology utilization and organizational agility. J. Comput. Inform. Syst. (2011)

  16. Leonardi, P.M.: Activating the informational capabilities of information technology for organizational change. Organ. Sci. 18, 813–831 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Schwartz, E.: The real options approach to valuation: challenges and opportunities. Latin. Amer. J. Econ. 50, 163–177 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Shi, W., Min, K.J.: Product remanufacturing: a real options approach. IEEE. T. Eng. Manage. 61, 237–250 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Custódio, C., Metzger, D.: Financial expert CEOs: CEO’ s work experience and firm’ s financial policies. J. Financ. Econ. 114, 125–154 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Almeida, H., Philippon, T.: The risk-adjusted cost of financial distress. J. Financ. 62, 2557–2586 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Cassimon, D., Engelen, P.J., Yordanov, V.: Compound real option valuation with phase-specific volatility: a multi-phase mobile payments case study. Technovation 31, 240–255 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Slade, M.E.: Valuing managerial flexibility: an application of real-option theory to mining investments. J. Environ. Econ. Manag. 41, 193–233 (2001)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Benaroch, M.: Managing information technology investment risk: a real options perspective. J. Manage. Inform. Syst. 19, 43–84 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Willigers, B.J.A., Hansen, T.L.: Project valuation in the pharmaceutical industry: a comparison of least- squares Monte Carlo real option valuation and conventional approaches. R&D Manage. 38, 520–537 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Grundfest, J.A., Huang, P.H.: The unexpected value of litigation: a real options perspective. Stanford. Law. Rev. 58, 1267–1336 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gilroy, B.M., Lukas, E.: The choice between greenfield investment and cross-border acquisition: a real option approach. Q. Rev Econ. Financ. 46, 447–465 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kyläheiko, K., Sandström, J.: Strategic options-based framework for management of dynamic capabilities in manufacturing firms. J. Manuf. Tech. Manage. 18, 966–984 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Li, Y., James, B.E., Madhavan, R., et al.: Real options: taking stock and looking ahead. Adv. Strateg. Manag. 24, 31–66 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, J., Hwang, W.L.: A fuzzy set approach for R&D portfolio selection using a real options valuation model. Omega-Int. J. Manage. S. 35, 247–257 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Collan, M., Fullér, R., Mezei, J.: A fuzzy pay-off method for real option valuation. J. Appl. Math. Decis. Sci. (2009). doi:10.1155/2009/238196

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Chevalier-Roignant, B., Flath, C.M., Huchzermeier, A., et al.: Strategic investment under uncertainty: a synthesis. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 215, 639–650 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  32. Copeland, T., Antikarov, V.: Real Options. Texere, New York (2001)

    Google Scholar 

  33. Copeland, T., Tufano, P.: A real-world way to manage real options. Harvard Bus. Rev. 82, 90–99 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  34. Smith, J.E.: Alternative approaches for solving real-options problems: (Comment on Brandão, et al.: 2005). Decision Anal. 2, 89–102 (2005)

  35. Hayya, J.C., Ramasesh, R.V., Tyworth, J.G., et al.: JIT delivery with stochastic lead time. J. Oper. Res. Soc. 64, 97–105 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Geunes, J., Pardalos, P.M.: Network optimization in supply chain management and financial engineering: an annotated bibliography. Networks. 42, 66–84 (2003)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  37. Manzini, R., Gamberi, M., Gebennini, E., et al.: An integrated approach to the design and management of a supply chain system. Int. J. Manuf. Tech. 37, 625–640 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Bousquin, J., Gambeta, E., Esterman, M., et al.: Life cycle assessment in the print industry. J. Ind. Ecol. 16, S195–S205 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Tempelmeier, H.: A multi-level inventory system with a make-to-order supplier. Int. J. Prod. Res. 51, 6880–6890 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Gatheral, J., Schied, A.: Optimal trade execution under geometric Brownian motion in the Almgren and Chriss framework. Int. J. Theor. Appl. Financ. 14, 353–368 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work is supported by National Nature Science Foundation of China (Nos. 71231004, 71521001, 71171071, 71501058 and 71571060), Anhui Province Natural Science Foundation (No. 1608085QG167) and the Humanities and Social Sciences Foundation of the Chinese Ministry of Education (No. 15YJC630097). Panos M. Pardalos is partially supported by the project of “Distinguished International Professor by the Chinese Ministry of Education” (MS2014HFGY026).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Xinbao Liu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, Z., Liu, X., Pei, J. et al. Real options approach to explore the effect of organizational change on IoT development project. Optim Lett 11, 995–1011 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-016-1006-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-016-1006-8

Keywords

Navigation