Skip to main content
Log in

A DDF based model for efficiency evaluation in two-stage DEA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Optimization Letters Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In some cases, decision making units have a two-stage structure, in which the first stage uses inputs to produce outputs that are subsequently used as inputs for the second stage. This paper departs from previous two-stage data envelopment analysis by proposing a new combined model, based on directional distance function, that improves the accuracy of the efficiency scores under constant returns to scale production technologies. We compare the proposed model with the existing ones in the literature by means of a numerical analysis, showing its applicability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barros, C.P., Peypoch, N.: Productivity changes in Portuguese bus companies. Transp. Policy 17(5), 295–302 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Castelli, L., Pesenti, R., Ukovich, W.: A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered. Ann. Oper. Res. 173(1), 207–235 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Chambers, R.G., Chung, Y., Färe, R.: Benefit and distance functions. J. Econ. Theory 70, 407–419 (1996)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Programming with linear fractional functional. Nav. Res. Logist. Q. 9(3/4), 181–185 (1962)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W., Rhodes, E.: Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2(6), 429–444 (1978)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen, Y., Cook, W.D., Li, N., Zhu, J.: Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 196(3), 1170–1176 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen, Y., Liang, L., Yang, F.: A DEA game model approach to supply chain efficiency. Ann. Oper. Res. 145(1), 5–13 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Cook, W.D., Zhu, J., Bi, G., Yang, F.: Network DEA: additive efficiency decomposition. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 207, 1122–1129 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Färe, R.: Measuring Farrell efficiency for a firm with intermediate inputs. Acad. Econ. Pap. 19, 329–340 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  10. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S.: Intertemporal Production Frontiers: With Dynamic DEA. Kluwer, Boston (1996a)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  11. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S.: Productivity and intermediate products: A frontier approach. Econ. Lett. 50, 65–70 (1996b)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Färe, R., Grosskopf, S.: Network DEA. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 34, 35–49 (2000)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Färe, R., Whittaker, G.: An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data. J. Agric. Econ. 46, 201–213 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Golany, B., Hackman, S.T., Passy, U.: An efficiency measurement framework for multi-stage production systems. Ann. Oper. Res. 145(1), 51–68 (2006)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Guo, C., Shureshjani, R.A., Foroughi, A.A., Zhu, J.: Decomposition weights and overall efficiency in two-stage additive network DEA. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 257(3), 896–906 (2017)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Kao, C., Hwang, S.N.: Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 185(1), 418–429 (2008)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  17. Kao, C., Hwang, S.N.: Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 211(3), 515–519 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Kao, C., Liu, S.T.: Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 176, 20–35 (2011)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Liang, L., Cook, W., Zhu, J.: DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav. Res. Logist. 55, 643–653 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J.: Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Manag. Sci. 45(9), 1270–1288 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Tone, K., Tsutsui, M.: Dynamic DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega 38(3–4), 145–156 (2010)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Tone, K., Tsutsui, M.: Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 197(1), 243–252 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang, Y.M., Chin, K.S.: Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process. Expert Syst. Appl. 37, 8799–8808 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhu, J.: Airlines performance via two-stage network DEA approach. J. Cent. Cathedra 4, 260–269 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors express their sincere thanks to the referees for their comments on the earlier version of this paper and their helpful suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Hadi-Vencheh.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wanke, P.F., Hadi-Vencheh, A. & Forghani, A. A DDF based model for efficiency evaluation in two-stage DEA. Optim Lett 12, 1029–1044 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-017-1162-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11590-017-1162-5

Keywords

Navigation