Skip to main content
Log in

Recommend trustworthy services using interval numbers of four parameters via cloud model for potential users

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

How to discover the trustworthy services is a challenge for potential users because of the deficiency of usage experiences and the information overload of QoE (quality of experience) evaluations from consumers. Aiming to the limitations of traditional interval numbers in measuring the trustworthiness of service, this paper proposed a novel service recommendation approach using the interval numbers of four parameters (INF) for potential users. In this approach, a trustworthiness cloud model was established to identify the eigenvalue of INF via backward cloud generator, and a new formula of INF possibility degree based on geometrical analysis was presented to ensure the high calculation precision. In order to select the highly valuable QoE evaluations, the similarity of client-side feature between potential user and consumers was calculated, and the multi-attributes trustworthiness values were aggregated into INF by the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process method. On the basis of ranking INF, the sort values of trustworthiness of candidate services were obtained, and the trustworthy services were chosen to recommend to potential user. The experiments based on a realworld dataset showed that it can improve the recommendation accuracy of trustworthy services compared to other approaches, which contributes to solving cold start and information overload problem in service recommendation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Casas P, Schatz R. Quality of experience in cloud services: survey and measurements. Computer Networks, 2014, 68(1): 149–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rosaci D, Sarne G M L. Recommending multimedia Web services in a multi-device environment. Information Systems, 2013, 38(2): 198–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen X, Zheng Z B, Yu Q, Lyu M R. Web service recommendation via exploiting location and QoS information. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2014, 25(7): 1913–1924

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ma H, Hu Z G, Zhang H Y. Personalized fusion method of service trust evaluation in cloud computing environment. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2014, 35(4): 776–780

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Lin Y M, Wang X L, Zhou T Z. Survey on quality evaluation and control of online reviews. Journal of Software, 2014, (253): 506–527, 2014

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lüa L Y, Medob M, Yeung C H. Recommender systems. Physics Reports. 2012, 519(2): 1–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Pereira R, Lopes H, Breitman K, Mundim V, Peixoto W. Cloud based real-time collaborative filtering for item-item recommendations. Computers in Industry, 2014, 65(2): 279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhang Y L, Zheng Z B, Lyu M R. Exploring Latent Features for Memory-Based QoS Prediction in Cloud Computing. In: Proceedings of the 30th IEEE Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems. 2011: 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chen X, Liu X D, Huang Z C, Sun H L. RegionKNN: a scalable hybrid collaborative filtering algorithm for personalized web service recommendation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services. 2010, 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lo W, Yin J W, Deng S G, Li Y, Wu Z H. Collaborative web service QoS prediction with location-based regularization, In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Web Services. 2012, 464–471

    Google Scholar 

  11. Tang M D, Jiang Y C, Liu J X. User location-aware Web services QoS prediction. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2012, 33(12): 2664–2668

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ma WL, Zhu L N, Wang WL. Cloud service selection model based on QoS-aware in cloud manufacturing environment. Computer Integrated Manafacturing Systems, 2014, 20(5): 1246–1254

    Google Scholar 

  13. Mohamad M, Nizar B, Jamal B. Probabilistic approach for QoS-aware recommender system for trustworthy web service selection. Applied Intelligence, 2014, 41(2): 503–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wen T, Li Y Q, Sheng G J. Improved PSO-based web service selection under uncertain information. Journal of Jilin University (Engineering and Technology Edition), 2014, 44(1): 129–136

    Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang L C, Qing C. Hybrid-context-aware web service selection approach. Journal of Internet Technology, 2013, 14(1): 57–69

    Google Scholar 

  16. Hu Q Z, Zhang WH, Research and Its Application of Interval Numbers Theory. Beijing: Science Press, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hu Q Z, Yu L, Zhang A P. Research about multi-objective decision making method based on interval numbers of three elements. Journal of Systems and Management, 2010, 19(1): 25–30

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hu J H, Lin Z Y. Multi-criteria decision making method based on interval numbers of four parameters. Operations Research and Management Science, 2013, 22(6): 84–91

    Google Scholar 

  19. Li D Y, Meng H J, Shi X M. Membership clouds and membership cloud generators. Journal of Computer Research and Development, 1995, 32(6): 15–20

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Y C, Zhang H S, Ma Y T, Li D Y, Chen G S. Collective intelligence and uncertain knowledge representation in cloud computing. China Communications, 2011, 27(3): 58–66

    Google Scholar 

  21. Wang G Y, Xu C L, Li D Y. Generic normal cloud model. Information Sciences, 2014, 280: 1–15

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu C Y, Feng M, Dai X J, Li D Y. A new algorithm of backward cloud. Journal of System Simulation, 2004, 16(11): 2417–2420

    Google Scholar 

  23. Xu Z H, Da Q L. Possibility degree method for ranking interval numbers and its applicaion. Journal of System Engineering, 2003, 18(1): 67–70

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mikhailov L, Tsvetinov P. Evaluation of services using a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process. Applied Soft Computing, 2004, 5(1): 23–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Xu Z S. Two methods of maximizing deviations of multi-attribute decision making. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Engineering Management, 2001, 15(2): 21–29

    Google Scholar 

  26. Zheng Z B, Ma H, Lyu M R, King I. Collaborative Web service QoS prediction via neighborhood integrated matrix factorization. IEEE Transactions on Services Computing, 2013, 6(3): 289–299

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ding S, Yang S L, Zhang Y T, Liang C Y, Xia C Y. Combining QoS prediction and customer satisfaction estimation to solve cloud service trustworthiness evaluation problems. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2014, 56: 216–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Ding S, Xia C Y, Zhou K L, Yang S L, Shang J S. Decision support for personalized cloud service selection through multi-Attribute trustworthiness evaluation. PLOS ONE, 2014, 9(6): e97762

    Google Scholar 

  29. Al-Masri E, Mahmoud Q H. Web service discovery and client goals. Computer, 2009, 42(1): 104–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Ma H, Hu Z G, Zhang H Y. Personalized recommendation framework for trustworthy services in cloud paradigm. Journal of Chinese Computer Systems, 2014, 35(5): 967–972

    Google Scholar 

  31. Armbrust M, Fox A, Griffith R, Joseph A D, Katz R, Konwinski A, Lee G, Patterson D, Rabkin A, Stoica I, Zaharia M. A view of cloud computing. Communications of the ACM, 2010, 53(4): 50–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wang P, Zhang S Y, Chen X J. A novel reputation reporting mechanism based on cloud model and gray system theory. International Journal of Advancements in Computing Technology, 2011, 3(10): 75–84

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. Hu C H, Chen X H, Wu M, Liu J X. A service trust negotiation and access control strategy based on SLA in cloud computing. Science in China Series E-Information Sciences, 2012, 42(3): 314–332

    Google Scholar 

  34. Shen HY, LiuGX. An efficient and trustworthy resource sharing platform for collaborative cloud computing. IEEE Transactions on Parallel and Distributed Systems, 2014, 25(4): 862–875

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Huang X D. UsageQoS: estimating the QoS of Web services through online user communities. ACM Transactions on the Web, 2013, 8(1): 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Mo Y J, Chen J W, Xie X, Luo C Q, Yang L T. Cloud-based mobile multimedia recommendation system with user behavior information. IEEE Systems Journal, 2014, 8(1): 184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Xia Y N, ZhouMC, Luo X, Zhu Q S, Li J, Huang Y. Stochastic modeling and quality evaluation of infrastructure-as-a-service clouds. IEEE Transactions on Automation Science and Engineering, 2015, 12(1): 162–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Li W F, Zhong Y, Wang X, Cao Y L. Resource virtualization and service selection in cloud logistics. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2013, 36(6): 1696–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Luo X, You Z H, Zhou M C, Li S, Leung H, Xia Y N, Zhu Q S. A highly efficient approach to protein interactome mapping based on collaborative filtering framework. Scientific Reports, 2015, 5: 7702

  40. Li Y, Cao B, Xu L D, Yin J W, Deng S G, Yin Y Y, Wu Z H. An efficient recommendation method for improving business process modeling. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2014, 10(1): 502–513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Luo X, Xia Y, Zhu Q. Incremental collaborative filtering recommender based on regularized matrix factorization. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012, 27: 271–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Luo X, Xia Y N, Zhu Q S, Li Y. Boosting the k-nearest-neighborhood based incremental collaborative filtering. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2013, 53: 90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Xu H L, Wu X, Li X D, Yan B P. Comparison study of Internet recommendation system. Journal of Software, 2009, 20(2): 350-362.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Zheng Z B, Lyu M R. Collaborative reliability prediction for serviceoriented systems. In: Proceedings of the 32nd ACM/IEEE International Conference on Software Engineering. 2010, 35–44

    Google Scholar 

  45. Sun X H, Kong F S, Ye S. A comparison of several algorihtms of collaborative filtering in startup stage. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Intenrational Conefrenee on Networking, Sensing and Controlling. 2005, 25–28

    Google Scholar 

  46. Yu K, Schwaighofer A, Tresp V, Xu X W, Kriegel H P. Probabilistic memory-based collaborative filtering. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2004, 16(1): 56–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Rashid A L, Albert I, Cosley D, Lam S K, Mcnee S M, Konstan J A, Riedl J. Getting to know you: learning new user preferences in recommender systems. In: Proceedings of the Intenrational Conefrenee on Intelligent User Interfaces. 2002, 127–134

    Google Scholar 

  48. Jannach D, Zanker M, Felfernig A, Feiedrich G. Recommender systems: an intruoduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  49. Pan S J, Yang Q. A survey on transfer learning. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2010, 22(10): 1345–1359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Nori N, Bollegala D, Kashima H. A dimension reduction approach to multinomial relation prediction. Transactions of the Japanese Society for Artificial Intelligence, 2014, 29(1): 168–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Liu B, Xiong H, Papadimitriou S, Fu Y J, Yao Z J. A general geographical probabilistic factor model for point of interest recommendation. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 2015, 27(5): 1167–1179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Gao F J. Possibility degree and comprehensive priority of interval numbers. Systems Engineering-Theory and Practice, 2013, 33(8): 2033–2040

    Google Scholar 

  53. Zhang H Y, Wang J Q, Chen X H. An outranking approach for multicriteria decision-making problems with interval-valued neutrosophic sets. Neural Computing and Applications, 2015

    Google Scholar 

  54. Sun L, Dong H, Hussain F K, Hussain O K, Chang E. Cloud service selection: state-of-the-art and future research directions. Journal of Network and Computer Applications, 2014, 45: 134–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Weinhardt C, Anandasivam A, Blau B, Stosser J. Business models in the service world. IT Professional, 2009, 11(2): 28–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Fardin A M, Naser N B, Ali N M. Empower service directories with knowledge. Knowledge-Based Systems, 2012, 30: 172–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhigang Hu.

Additional information

Hua Ma received his BS in computer science and technology and his MS in computer application technology from Central South University (CSU), China in 2003 and 2006, respectively. He is currently a PhD candidate from CSU and an associate professor in Hunan International Economics University, China. His research interests focus on cloud computing, trusted computing and high performance computing.

Zhigang Hu received his BS and his MS from Central South University (CSU), China in 1985 and in 1988, and his PhD from Central South University in 2002. He is currently a professor and PhD supervisor of CSU. His research interests focus on the parallel computing, cloud computing, and high performance computing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ma, H., Hu, Z. Recommend trustworthy services using interval numbers of four parameters via cloud model for potential users. Front. Comput. Sci. 9, 887–903 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-015-4532-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-015-4532-0

Keywords

Navigation