Skip to main content
Log in

Local structured representation for generic object detection

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Structure information plays an important role in both object recognition and detection. This paper studies what visual structure is and addresses the problem of structure modeling and representation from two aspects: visual feature and topology model. Firstly, at feature level, we propose Local Structured Descriptor to capture the object’s local structure effectively, and develop the descriptors from shape and texture information, respectively. Secondly, at topology level, we present a local structured model with a boosted feature selection and fusion scheme. All experiments are conducted on the challenging PASCAL Visual Object Classes (VOC) datasets from VOC2007 to VOC2010. Experimental results show that our method achieves very competitive performance.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alexe B, Deselaers T, Ferrari V. Measuring the objectness of image windows. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2012, 34(11): 2189–2202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Cheng M M, Zhang Z, Lin W Y, Torr P. Bing: binarized normed gradients for objectness estimation at 300fps. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2014, 3286–3293

    Google Scholar 

  3. Zitnick C, Dollár P. Edge boxes: locating object proposals from edges. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision. 2014, 391–405

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yao C, Bai X, Liu W. A unified framework for multioriented text detection and recognition. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2014, 23(11): 4737–4749

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhu Y, Yao C, Bai X. Scene text detection and recognition: recent advances and future trends. Frontiers of Computer Science, 2016, 10(1): 19–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dalal N, Triggs B. Histograms of oriented gradients for human detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2005, 886–893

    Google Scholar 

  7. Vedaldi A, Gulshan V, Varma M, Zisserman A. Multiple kernels for object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 606–613

    Google Scholar 

  8. Wang X, Han T X, Yan S. An HOG-LBP human detector with partial occlusion handling. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 32–39

    Google Scholar 

  9. Felzenszwalb P, Girshick R, McAllester D, Ramanan D. Object detection with discriminatively trained part-based models. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2010, 32(9): 1627–1645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fergus R, Perona P, Zisserman A. Object class recognition by unsupervised scale-invariant learning. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2003, 264–271

    Google Scholar 

  11. Schnitzspan P, Roth S, Schiele B. Automatic discovery of meaningful object parts with latent CRFs. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2010, 121–128

    Google Scholar 

  12. Yang Y, Ramanan D. Articulated pose estimation with flexible mixtures-of-parts. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1385–1392

    Google Scholar 

  13. Zhu L, Chen Y, Yuille A L, Freeman W T. Latent hierarchical structural learning for object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2010, 1062–1069

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fischler M, Elschlager R. The representation and matching of pictorial structures. IEEE Transactions on Computers, 1973, 22(1): 67–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ojala T, Pietikäinen M, Harwood D. A comparative study of texture measures with classification based on featured distributions. Pattern Recognition, 1996, 29(1): 51–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lowe D G. Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 60(2): 91–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mark E, Gool L, Williams C K, Winn J, Zisserman A. The pascal visual object classes (VOC) challenge. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2010, 88(2): 303–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang J, Huang K, Yu Y, Tan T. Boosted local structured HOG-LBP for object localization. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1393–1400

    Google Scholar 

  19. Papageorgiou, C, Poggio T. A trainable system for object detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2000, 38(1): 15–33

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Viola P, Jones M J. Robust real-time face detection. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2004, 57(2): 137–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee T S. Image representation using 2D gabor wavelets. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 1996, 18(10): 959–971

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shechtman E, Irani M. Matching local self-similarities across images and videos. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2007, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrari V, Fevrier L, Jurie F, Schmid C. Groups of adjacent contour segments for object detection. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2008, 30(1): 36–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Bai X, Bai S, Zhu Z, Latecki L J. 3D shape matching via two layer coding. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2015, 37(12): 2361–2373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J. Beyond bags of features: spatial pyramid matching for recognizing natural scene categories. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2006, 2169–2178

    Google Scholar 

  26. Sivic J, Russell B, Efros A, Zisserman A, Freeman W. Discovering objects and their location in images. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2005, 370–377

    Google Scholar 

  27. Felzenszwalb P F, Huttenlocher D P. Distance transforms of sampled functions. Theory of Computing, 2012, 8(1): 415–428

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Estepar R S J. Local Structure tensor for multidimensional signal processing: applications to medical image analysis. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Valladolid: University of Valladolid, 2005

    Google Scholar 

  29. Morrone C, Burr D. Feature detection in human vision: a phasedependent energy model. In: Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences. 1988, 221–245

    Google Scholar 

  30. Venkatesh S, Owens R. On the classification of image features. Pattern Recognition Letters, 1990, 11(5): 339–349

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  31. Granlund G H, Knutsson H. Signal Processing for Computer Vision. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1995

    Book  Google Scholar 

  32. Oliva A, Torralba A. Modeling the shape of the scene: a holistic representation of the spatial envelope. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2001, 42(3): 145–175

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  33. Ojala T, Pietikainen M, Maenpaa T. Multiresolution gray-scale and rotation invariant texture classification with local binary patterns. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2002, 24(7): 971–987

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  34. Varma M, Babu B R. More generality in efficient multiple kernel learning. In: Proceedings of International Conference onMachine Learning. 2009, 1065–1072

    Google Scholar 

  35. Friedman J, Hastie T, Tibshirani R. Additive logistic regression: a statistical view of boosting. Annuals of Statistics, 2000, 28(2): 374–376

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  36. Hussain S, Triggs B. Feature sets and dimensionality reduction for visual object detection. In: Proceedings of British Machine Vision Conference. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  37. Felzenszwalb P F, Girshick R B, McAllester D. Discriminatively Trained Deformable Part Models, Release 3

  38. Felzenszwalb, P F, Girshick R B, McAllester D. Discriminatively Trained Deformable Part Models, Release 4, 2010

  39. Gehler P, Nowozin S. On feature combination for multiclass object classification. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 221–228

    Google Scholar 

  40. Torralba A, Murphy K, Freeman W. Sharing features: efficient boosting procedures for multiclass object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2004, 762–769

    Google Scholar 

  41. Everingham M, Gool V L, Williams C K I, Winn J, Zisserman A. Empirical analysis of detection cascades of boosted classifiers for rapid object detection. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2003, 2781: 297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Everingham M, Gool V L, Williams C K I, Winn J, Zisserman A. The PASCAL visual object classes challenge 2007 (VOC2007) results. International Journal of Computer Vision, 2010, 88(2): 303–338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Desai C, Ramanan D, Fowlkes C. Discriminative models for multiclass object layout. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2009, 229–236

    Google Scholar 

  44. Pedersoli M, Vedaldi A, Gonzalez J. A coarse-to-fine approach for fast deformable object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1353–1360

    Google Scholar 

  45. Razavi N, Gall J, Gool V L. Scalable multi-class object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1505–1512

    Google Scholar 

  46. Divvala S K, Zitnick C, Kapoor A, Baker S. Detecting objects using unsupervised parts-based attributes. Technical Report CMU-RI-TR-11- 10, Robotics Institute. 2010

    Google Scholar 

  47. Schnitzspan P, Fritz M, Roth S, Schiele B. Discriminative structure learning of hierarchical representations for object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2009, 2238–2245

    Google Scholar 

  48. Malisiewicz T, Gupta A, Efros A A. Ensemble of exemplar-svms for object detection and beyond. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2011, 89–96

    Google Scholar 

  49. Dubout C, Fleuret F. Deformable part models with individual part scaling. In: Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. 2013

    Google Scholar 

  50. Gidaris S, Komodakis N. Object detection via a multi-region and semantic segmentation-aware cnn model. In: Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision. 2015, 1134–1142

    Google Scholar 

  51. Girshick R. Fast r-cnn. 2015, arXiv:1504.08083

    Book  Google Scholar 

  52. Girshick R, Donahue J, Darrell T, Malik J. Rich feature hierarchies for accurate object detection and semantic segmentation. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition, 2014, 580–587

    Google Scholar 

  53. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Spatial pyramid pooling in deep convolutional networks for visual recognition. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision. 2014, 346–361

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liang X, Liu S, Wei Y, Liu L, Lin L, Yan S. Computational baby learning. 2014, arXiv:1411.2861

    Google Scholar 

  55. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Sun J. Faster R-CNN: towards real-time object detection with region proposal networks. 2015, arXiv:1506.01497

    Google Scholar 

  56. Ren S, He K, Girshick R, Zhang X, Sun J. Object detection networks on convolutional feature maps. 2015, arXiv:1504.06066

    Google Scholar 

  57. Ren W, Huang K, Tao D, Tan T. Weakly supervised large scale object localization with multiple instance learning and bag splitting. IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, 2016, 32(2): 405–416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Wan L, Eigen D, Fergus R. End-to-end integration of a convolutional network, deformable parts model and non-maximum suppression. 2014, arXiv:1411.5309

    Google Scholar 

  59. Wang C, Huang K, Ren W, Zhang J, Maybank S. Large-scale weakly supervised object localization via latent category learning. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 2015, 24(4): 1371–1385

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  60. Zhang Y, Sohn K, Villegas R, Pan G, Lee H. Improving object detection with deep convolutional networks via Bayesian optimization and structured prediction. 2015, arXiv:1504.03293

    Book  Google Scholar 

  61. Zhu Y, Urtasun R, Salakhutdinov R, Fidler S. segDeepM: exploiting segmentation and context in deep neural networks for object detection. 2015, arXiv:1502.04275

    Google Scholar 

  62. Song X, Wu T, Jia Y, Zhu S C. Discriminatively trained and-or tree models for object detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2013, 23–28

    Google Scholar 

  63. Wang X, Lin L, Huang L, Yan S. Incorporating structural alternatives and sharing into hierarchy for multiclass object recognition and detection. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2013, 3334–3341

    Google Scholar 

  64. Mark E, Gool V L, Williams C K I, Winn J, Zisserman A. The PASCAL Visual Object Classes Challenge 2008 (VOC2008) Results. Technical Report. 2008

    Google Scholar 

  65. Chen Y, Zhu L, Yuille A. Active mask hierarchies for object detection. In: Proceedings of European Conference on Computer Vision. 2010, 43–56

    Google Scholar 

  66. Ott P, Everingham M. Shared parts for deformable part-based models. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition. 2011, 1513–1520

    Google Scholar 

  67. Zhang J, Huang Y, Huang K, Wu Z, Tan T. Data decomposition and spatial mixture modeling for part based model. In: Proceedings of Asian Conference on Computer Vision. 2012, 123–137

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the National Basic Research Program of China (2012CB316302), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 61403387, 61322209 and 61175007), the Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDA06040102).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Junge Zhang.

Additional information

Junge Zhang received his PhD in pattern recognition and intelligent systems from Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CASIA), China in 2013. In July 2013, he joined the Center for Research on Intelligent Perception and Computing (CRIPAC), China, as an assistant professor. His major research interests include computer vision, pattern recognition. He served as the publicity chair and the technical program committee member of several conferences, and the peer reviewer of over 10 international journals and conferences. In 2010 and 2011, he and his group members won the champion of PASCAL VOC challenge on object detection and ranked the second on object classification.

Kaiqi Huang received his MS in electrical engineering from Nanjing University of Science and Technology, China, and PhD in signal and information processing from Southeast University, China. After receiving the PhD, he became a postdoctoral researcher with the National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, China where he is currently a professor. He has published over 100 papers on TPAMI, TIP, TCSVT, TSMCB, CVIU, Pattern Recognition and CVPR, ECCV. He is senior member of IEEE and the Deputy Secretary General of the IEEE Beijing Section. His interests include visual surveillance, image and video analysis, human vision and cognition, computer vision, etc.

Tieniu Tan received his BS in electronic engineering from Xi’an Jiaotong University, China in 1984, and his MS and PhD in electronic engineering from Imperial College London, UK in 1986 and 1989, respectively. In January 1998, he returned to China to join the National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition (NLPR), Institute of Automation of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China as a full professor. He is currently the director of Center for Research on Intelligent Perception and Computing at the Institute of Automation, China, and also serves as the vice president of CAS. His current research interests include biometrics, image and video understanding, and information forensics and security.

Zhaoxiang Zhang received his BS in circuits and systems from the University of Science and Technology of China, China in 2004. After that, he was a PhD candidate under the supervision of Professor Tieniu Tan in the National Laboratory of Pattern Recognition, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS), China, where he received his PhD in 2009. In October 2009, he joined the School of Computer Science and Engineering, Beihang University, China as an assistant professor (2009–2011), an associate professor (2012–2015) and the vise-director of the Department of Computer application technology (2014–2015). In July 2015, he returned to the Institute of Automation, CAS. He is now a professor in the Research Center for Brain-inspired Intelligence.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhang, J., Huang, K., Tan, T. et al. Local structured representation for generic object detection. Front. Comput. Sci. 11, 632–648 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-5530-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-016-5530-6

Keywords

Navigation