Skip to main content
Log in

FragDPI: a novel drug-protein interaction prediction model based on fragment understanding and unified coding

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Computer Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Prediction of drug-protein binding is critical for virtual drug screening. Many deep learning methods have been proposed to predict the drug-protein binding based on protein sequences and drug representation sequences. However, most existing methods extract features from protein and drug sequences separately. As a result, they can not learn the features characterizing the drug-protein interactions. In addition, the existing methods encode the protein (drug) sequence usually based on the assumption that each amino acid (atom) has the same contribution to the binding, ignoring different impacts of different amino acids (atoms) on the binding. However, the event of drug-protein binding usually occurs between conserved residue fragments in the protein sequence and atom fragments of the drug molecule. Therefore, a more comprehensive encoding strategy is required to extract information from the conserved fragments.

In this paper, we propose a novel model, named FragDPI, to predict the drug-protein binding affinity. Unlike other methods, we encode the sequences based on the conserved fragments and encode the protein and drug into a unified vector. Moreover, we adopt a novel two-step training strategy to train FragDPI. The pre-training step is to learn the interactions between different fragments using unsupervised learning. The fine-tuning step is for predicting the binding affinities using supervised learning. The experiment results have illustrated the superiority of FragDPI.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Subscribe and save

Springer+ Basic
$34.99 /Month
  • Get 10 units per month
  • Download Article/Chapter or eBook
  • 1 Unit = 1 Article or 1 Chapter
  • Cancel anytime
Subscribe now

Buy Now

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Explore related subjects

Discover the latest articles and news from researchers in related subjects, suggested using machine learning.

References

  1. Swinney D C, Anthony J. How were new medicines discovered? Nature Reviews Drug Discovery, 2011, 10(7): 507–519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gupta S, Jadaun A, Kumar H, Raj U, Varadwaj P K, Rao A R. Exploration of new drug-like inhibitors for serine/threonine protein phosphatase 5 of Plasmodium falciparum: a docking and simulation study. Journal of Biomolecular Structure and Dynamics, 2015, 33(11): 2421–2441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yuriev E, Agostino M, Ramsland P A. Challenges and advances in computational docking: 2009 in review. Journal of Molecular Recognition, 2011, 24(2): 149–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang K, Fu T, Glass L M, Zitnik M, Xiao C, Sun J. DeepPurpose: a deep learning library for drug-target interaction prediction. Bioinformatics, 2020, 36(22–23): 5545–5547

    Google Scholar 

  5. Huang K, Xiao C, Glass L M, Sun J. MolTrans: molecular interaction transformer for drug-target interaction prediction. Bioinformatics, 2021, 37(6): 830–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Zhao Q, Xiao F, Yang M, Li Y, Wang J. AttentionDTA: prediction of drug—target binding affinity using attention model. In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). 2019, 64–69

  7. Liao Z, You R, Huang X, Yao X, Huang T, Zhu S. DeepDock: enhancing ligand-protein interaction prediction by a combination of ligand and structure information. In: Proceedings of 2019 IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedicine (BIBM). 2019, 311–317

  8. Bai F, Morcos F, Cheng R R, Jiang H, Onuchic J N. Elucidating the druggable interface of protein-protein interactions using fragment docking and coevolutionary analysis. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2016, 113(50): E8051–E8058

    Google Scholar 

  9. Yao H, Song Y, Chen Y, Wu N, Xu J, Sun C, Zhang J, Weng T, Zhang Z, Wu Z, Cheng L, Shi D, Lu X, Lei J, Crispin M, Shi Y, Li L, Li S. Molecular architecture of the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Cell, 2020, 183(3): 730–738.e13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Shu X, Royant A, Lin M Z, Aguilera T A, Lev-Ram V, Steinbach P A, Tsien R Y. Mammalian expression of infrared fluorescent proteins engineered from a bacterial phytochrome. Science, 2009, 324(5928): 804–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pahikkala T, Airola A, Pietila S, Shakyawar S, Szwajda A, Tang J, Aittokallio T. Toward more realistic drug-target interaction predictions. Briefings in Bioinformatics, 2015, 16(2): 325–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zheng X, Ding H, Mamitsuka H, Zhu S. Collaborative matrix factorization with multiple similarities for predicting drug-target interactions. In: Proceedings of the 19th ACM SIGKDD International Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. 2013, 1025–1033

  13. Özturk H, Özgür A, Ozkirimli E. DeepDTA: deep drug-target binding affinity prediction. Bioinformatics, 2018, 34(17): i821–i829

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nguyen T, Le H, Venkatesh S. GraphDTA: prediction of drug—target binding affinity using graph convolutional networks. BioRxiv, 2019: 684662

  15. Devlin J, Chang M W, Lee K, Toutanova K. BERT: pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. In: Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2019, 4171–4186

  16. Dong L, Yang N, Wang W, Wei F, Liu X, Wang Y, Gao J, Zhou M, Hon H W. Unified language model pre-training for natural language understanding and generation. In: Proceedings of the 33rd International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2019, 1170

  17. Radford A, Wu J, Child R, Luan D, Amodei D, Sutskever I. Language models are unsupervised multitask learners. OpenAI blog, 2019, 1(8): 9

    Google Scholar 

  18. Raffel C, Shazeer N, Roberts A, Lee K, Narang S, Matena M, Zhou Y, Li W, Liu P J. Exploring the limits of transfer learning with a unified text-to-text transformer. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 2020, 21: 1–67

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  19. Vaswani A, Shazeer N, Parmar N, Uszkoreit J, Jones L, Gomez A N, Kaiser L, Polosukhin I. Attention is all you need. In: Proceedings of the 31st International Conference on Neural Information Processing Systems. 2017, 6000–6010

  20. Karimi M, Wu D, Wang Z, Shen Y. DeepAffinity: interpretable deep learning of compound—protein affinity through unified recurrent and convolutional neural networks. Bioinformatics, 2019, 35(18): 3329–3338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu T, Lin Y, Wen X, Jorissen R N, Gilson M K. BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Research, 2007, 35(S1): D198–D201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Kuhn M, Von Mering C, Campillos M, Jensen L J, Bork P. STITCH: interaction networks of chemicals and proteins. Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, 36(S1): D684–D688

    Google Scholar 

  23. Suzek B E, Wang Y, Huang H, McGarvey P B, Wu C H, UniProt Consortium. UniRef clusters: a comprehensive and scalable alternative for improving sequence similarity searches. Bioinformatics, 2015, 31(6): 926–932

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Li M, Lu Z, Wu Y, Li Y. BACPI: a bi-directional attention neural network for compound—protein interaction and binding affinity prediction. Bioinformatics, 2022, 38(7): 1995–2002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Leonard T A, Różycki B, Saidi L F, Hummer G, Hurley J H. Crystal structure and allosteric activation of protein kinase C βII. Cell, 2011, 144(1): 55–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Sutton R B, Sprang S R. Structure of the protein kinase cβ phospholipid-binding C2 domain complexed with Ca2+. Structure, 1998, 6(11): 1395–1405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Thao T T N, Labroussaa F, Ebert N, V’kovski P, Stalder H, Portmann J, Kelly J, Steiner S, Holwerda M, Kratzel A, Gultom M, Schmied K, Laloli L, Hüsser L, Wider M, Pfaender S, Hirt D, Cippà V, Crespo-Pomar S, Schröder S, Muth D, Niemeyer D, Corman V M, Müller M A, Drosten C, Dijkman R, Jores J, Thiel V. Rapid reconstruction of SARS-CoV-2 using a synthetic genomics platform. Nature, 2020, 582(7813): 561–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tzenaki N, Papakonstanti E A. p110δ PI3 kinase pathway: emerging roles in cancer. Frontiers in Oncology, 2013, 3: 40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Takahashi Y, Hayakawa A, Sano R, Fukuda H, Harada M, Kubo R, Okawa T, Kominato Y. Histone deacetylase inhibitors suppress ACE2 and ABO simultaneously, suggesting a preventive potential against COVID-19. Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1): 3379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Volz H P, Gleiter C H. Monoamine oxidase inhibitors. Drugs & Aging, 1998, 13(5): 341–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kumar A, Redondo-Muñoz J, Perez-García V, Cortes I, Chagoyen M, Carrera A C. Nuclear but not cytosolic phosphoinositide 3-kinase beta has an essential function in cell survival. Molecular and Cellular Biology, 2011, 31(10): 2122–2133

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Key R&D Program of China (2019YFA0904303).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan Liu.

Additional information

Zhihui Yang is a PhD candidate in the School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China. His current research interests include synthetic biology, deep learning, metabolic pathway reconstruction, and metabolic flux analysis.

Juan Liu is a professor in the School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China. Her research interests include machine learning, data mining, bioinformatics, pattern recognition, and artificial intelligence methods for medicine.

Xuekai Zhu is a master’s student in the School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China. His current research interests are in artificial intelligence methods for bioinformatics.

Feng Yang is a PhD candidate in the School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China. His current research interests include machine learning, retrosynthesis prediction and metabolic pathway design.

Qiang Zhang is a PhD candidate in the School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China. Her current research interests include retrosynthesis prediction, metabolic pathway design, bioinformatics, and machine learning.

Hayat Ali Shah received his MS degree in Computer Science from Virtual University of Pakistan, Pakistan in 2018. He is currently a PhD candidate in the School of Computer Science, Wuhan University, China. His research interests are simulated alignments, multiple sequence alignments, machine learning, prediction and reconstruction of metabolic pathways.

Electronic supplementary material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Z., Liu, J., Zhu, X. et al. FragDPI: a novel drug-protein interaction prediction model based on fragment understanding and unified coding. Front. Comput. Sci. 17, 175903 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-022-2163-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-022-2163-9

Keywords