Skip to main content
Log in

Improving grinding fluid delivery using pneumatic barrier and compound nozzle

  • Machine Tool
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Grinding fluid is commonly applied to control grinding defects caused by high grinding zone temperature. Delivery of fluid to the grinding zone is obstructed by the formation of a stiff air layer around the grinding wheel. This results in huge wastage of grinding fluid. In the present paper, results of using a pneumatic barrier and a compound nozzle are discussed with respect to delivering fluid deep into the grinding zone. Grinding fluid passing through the grinding wheel contact zone is measured under different modes of fluid delivery using a flood cooling, or a compound, nozzle, with or without the application of a pneumatic barrier. It is found that the system using a pneumatic barrier with flood cooling nozzle, and that employing a compound nozzle perform better than the flood cooling nozzle. A compound nozzle along with a pneumatic barrier renders substantially less wastage of grinding fluid even at a low flow rate of grinding fluid. Above a fluid discharge of 475 ml/min, the compound nozzle alone shows effective penetration of grinding fluid through the grinding zone. Reduction of grinding force, specific energy and roughness of ground surface are obtained after using compound nozzle fluid delivery system. Compound nozzle may be used instead of flood cooling nozzle as it improves grinding performance even using 52.5 % less discharge of grinding fluid.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Malkin S (1989) Grinding technology: theory and application of machining with abrasives. Ellis Harwood Publication, UK

    Google Scholar 

  2. Rowe WB (2009) Principles of modern grinding technology, 1st edn. Elsevier, UK

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shibata J, Goto T, Yamamoto M (1982) Characteristics of air flow around a grinding wheel and their availability for assessing the wheel wear. Ann CIRP 31(1):233–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davies TP, Jackson RG (1981) Air flow around grinding wheels. Precis Eng 3(2):225–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ebbrell S, Woolley NH, Tridimas YD, Allanson DR, Rowe WB (2000) The effect of cutting fluid application methods on the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40:209–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brinksmeier E, Heinzel C, Wittmann M (1999) Friction, cooling and lubrication in grinding. Ann CIRP 48(2):581–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wu H, Lin B, Cai R, Morgan MN (2007) Measurement of the air boundary layer on the periphery of a rotating grinding wheel using LDA. J Phys: Conf Ser 76(012059):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  8. Mandal B, Singh R, Das S, Banerjee S (2010) Study of the behavior of air flow around a grinding wheel under the application of pneumatic barrier. In: Proceedings of the 36th international MATADOR conference, Manchester, UK, pp 113–116

  9. Mandal B, Majumder S, Das S, Banerjee S (2010) Predictive modeling and investigation on the formation of stiff air-layer around the grinding wheel. Adv Mater Res 83–86:654–659

    Google Scholar 

  10. Mandal B, Majumder S, Das S, Banerjee S (2011) Formation of a significantly less stiff air-layer around a grinding wheel pasted with rexine leather. Int J Precis Technol 2(1):12–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Engineer F, Guo C, Malkin S (1992) Experimental measurement of fluid flow through the grinding zone. Trans ASME J Eng Ind 114:61–66

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sarmacharya RS, George MN, Das S (1998) On the grinding wheel performance through minor wheel modification. In: Proceedings of the 18th AIMTDR conference, Kharagpur, India, pp 156–161

  13. Das S, Sharma AO, Singh SS, Nahate SV (2000) Grinding performance through effective application of grinding fluid. Proceedings of the international conference on manufacturing, Dhaka, Bangladesh, pp 231–239

  14. Irani RA, Bauer RJ, Warkentin A (2005) A review of cutting fluid application in the grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1696–1705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Webster JA (2007) Improving surface integrity and economics of grinding by optimum coolant application, with consideration of abrasive tool and process regime. Proc IMechE Part B: J Eng Manuf 221:1665–1675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mandal B, Biswas D, Sarkar A, Das S, Banerjee S (2013) Improving grindability of Inconel 600 using alumina wheel through pneumatic barrier assisted fluid application. Adv Mater Res 622–623:394–398

    Google Scholar 

  17. Mandal B, Biswas D, Sarkar A, Das S, Banerjee S (2013) Grinding performance using a compound nozzle characterised by small discharge of fluid. J Assoc Eng India 83(1):28–35

    Google Scholar 

  18. Banerjee S, Ghosal S, Dutta T (2008) Development of simple technique for improving the efficacy of fluid flow through the grinding zone. J Mater Process Technol 197(1–3):306–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Morgan MN, Jackson AR, Wu H, Baines-Jones V, Batako A, Rowe WB (2008) Optimisation of fluid application in grinding. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 57:363–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Aurich JC, Kirsch B, Herzenstiel P, Kugel P (2011) Hydraulic design of a grinding wheel with an internal cooling lubricant supply. Prod Eng Res Dev 5(2):119–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Mandal B, Singh R, Das S, Banerjee S (2011) Improving grinding performance by controlling air flow around a grinding wheel. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51:670–676

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mandal B, Singh R, Das S, Banerjee S (2012) Development of a grinding fluid delivery technique and its performance evaluation. Mater Manuf Process 27(4):436–442

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mandal B, Das GC, Das S, Banerjee S (2010) Development of a grinding fluid delivery technique. In: Proceedings of the 3rd international and 24th AIMTDR conference, Visakhapatnam, India, pp 897–901

  24. Hadad MJ, Tawakoli T, Sadeghi MH, Sadeghi B (2012) Temperature and energy partition in minimum quantity lubrication-MQL grinding process. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 54–55:10–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Li KM, Lin CP (2012) Study on minimum quantity lubrication in micro-grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(1–4):99–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Mao C, Tang X, Zou H, Zhou ZX, Yin W (2012) Experimental investigation of surface quality for minimum quantity oil–water lubrication grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(1–4):93–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Morgan MN, Barczak L, Batako A (2012) Temperatures in fine grinding with minimum quantity lubrication (MQL). Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60(9–12):951–958

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Santanu Das.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mandal, B., Das, G.C., Das, S. et al. Improving grinding fluid delivery using pneumatic barrier and compound nozzle. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 8, 187–193 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-013-0507-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-013-0507-x

Keywords

Navigation