Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

An integrated model of tool grinding: challenges, chances and limits of predicting process dynamics

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The objective of manufacturing technology, to reduce machining costs, increase product quality and optimize process setups, is only achievable by considering the entire manufacturing process and its interrelations. Especially in tool grinding, strong interactions exist between workpiece dynamics, grinding wheel engagement, structure deformations and cutting process conditions, which makes an integrated model necessary. This paper introduces a tool grinding model that combines time-dependent dynamical aspects of the grinding wheel and workpiece with local varying contact conditions to predict the final workpiece geometry and cutting forces with a high resolution in space and time. The model is capable to reproduce systemic effects on cutting forces and ground geometries which only occurs in the interplay of all system components. The model is also positively tested in representing influences of process parameters and in optimizing the machining. The excellent agreement of simulations and experimental data shows the model’s potential in manufacturing technology, but also in investigating grinding aspects, which are not fully understood yet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Altintas Y, Brecher C, Weck M, Witt S (2005) Virtual machine tool. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 54(2):115–138. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60022-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Altintas Y, Kersting P, Biermann D, Budak E, Denkena B, Lazoglu I (2014) Virtual process systems for part machining operations. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 63(2):585–605. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2014.05.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Altintas Y, Weck M (2004) Chatter stability of metal cutting and grinding. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 53(2):619–642. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)60032-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Aurich JC, Biermann D, Blum H, Brecher C, Carstensen C, Denkena B, Klocke F, Kröger M, Steinmann P, Weinert K (2009) Modelling and simulation of process: machine interaction in grinding. Prod Eng 3(1):111–120. doi:10.1007/s11740-008-0137-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Aurich J, Kirsch B (2012) Kinematic simulation of high-performancegrinding for analysis of chip parameters of single grains. CIRP J Manuf Sci Technol 5(3):164–174. doi:10.1016/j.cirpj.2012.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brecher C, Esser M, Witt S (2009) Interaction of manufacturing process and machine tool. Ann CIRP 58(2):588–607. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brinksmeier E, Aurich J, Govekar E, Heinzel C, Hoffmeister HW, Klocke F, Peters J, Rentsch R, Stephenson D, Uhlmann E, Weinert K, Wittmann M (2006) Advances in modeling and simulation of grinding processes. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 55(2):667–696. doi:10.1016/j.cirp.2006.10.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carslaw H, Jaeger J (1959) Conduction of heat in solids, vol 2. Clarendon Press, Oxford

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Carslaw HS, Scott H (1921) Introduction to the mathematical theory of the conduction of heat in solids. Macmillan Verlag, London

    Google Scholar 

  10. Chang CL (2000) Berechnung der Schmelzbadgeometrie beim Laserstrahlschweißen mit Mehrfokustechnik [Calculation of the molten pool geometry during laser welding with multiple focus technique]. Herbert Uzt Verlag - Wissenschaft, München

    Google Scholar 

  11. de Payrebrune KM, Kühnert M, Kröger M (2011) Heat conduction in grinding. Mach Dyn Probl 35(4):92–104

    Google Scholar 

  12. de Payrebrune KM, Kröger M (2016) Reduced models of grinding wheel topography and material removal to simulate dynamical aspects in grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-016-8694-1

    Google Scholar 

  13. de Payrebrune KM (2013) Analyse und Modellierung der Prozess-Strukturwechselwirkungen beim Werkzeugschleifen [Analysis and modelling of the process machine interaction in tool grinding]. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg

  14. de Payrebrune KM, Kröger M (2010) Nichtlineares Kontaktmodell für die Schleif-Prozess-Simulation [Nonlinear contact model for the grinding process simulation]. PAMM 10(1):261–262. doi:10.1002/pamm.201010123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. de Payrebrune KM, Kröger M (2015) Dynamical aspects in modeling long cantilevering workpieces in tool grinding. J Sound Vib 355:407–417. doi:10.1016/j.jsv.2015.06.027

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Deichmueller M, Denkena B, de Payrebrune K, Kröger M, Wiedemann S, Schröder A, Carstensen C (2013) Modeling of process machine interactions in tool grinding. In: Denkena B, Hollmann F (eds) Process machine interactions, Lecture notes in production engineering. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  17. Denkena B, Hollmann F (2012) Process machine interactions: predicition and manipulation of interactions between manufacturing processes and machine tool structures. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-642-32448-2

    Google Scholar 

  18. Feng W, Yao B, Chen B, Zhang D, Zhang X, Shen Z (2015) Modeling and simulation of process-machine interaction in grinding of cemented carbide indexable inserts. Shock Vib 2015:1–8. doi:10.1155/2015/508181

    Google Scholar 

  19. Herzenstiel P (2009) Hochleistungsschleifen mit einer definiert gesetzten CBN-Schleifscheibe [High performance grinding with a defined patterned CBN-grinding wheel]. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Kaiserslautern

  20. Herzenstiel P, Bouabid A, Steinmann P, Aurich JC (2008) Experimental investigation and computational simulation of process-machine interactions during high-performance surface grinding. In: Proceedings of 1st international conference on process-machine interaction, pp 267–278

  21. Lowin R (1980) Schleiftemperaturen und ihre Auswirkungen im Werkstück [Temperature during grinding and their effects on the workpiece]. Ph.D. thesis, Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen

  22. Rademacher A (2010) Adaptive finite element methods for nonlinear hyperbolic problems of second order. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universität Dortmund

  23. Rosenthal D (1946) The theory of moving sources of heat and its apllication to metal treatments. Transaction of the ASME, pp 849–866

  24. Rosenthal D, Cameron R (1947) Temperature distribution in cylinder heated by point source moving along its axis. Transaction of the ASME, pp 961–968

  25. Rowe WB (2001) Thermal analysis of high efficiency deep grinding. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41(1):1–19. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(00)00074-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Rowe W, Jin T (2001) Temperatures in high efficiency deep grinding. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 50(1):205–208. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)62105-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Schütte O (2003) Analyse und Modellierung nichtlinearer Schwingungen beim Außenrundeinstechschleifen [Analysis and modelling of nonlinear vibration during external plunge-cut grinding]. Ph.D. thesis, Universität Hannover

  28. Tönshoff H, Peters J, Inasaki I, Paul T (1992) Modelling and simulation of grinding processes. CIRP Ann-Manuf Technol 41(2):677–688. doi:10.1016/S0007-8506(07)63254-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tönshoff H, Denkena B, Jacobsen J, Heimann B, Schütte O, Grudzinski K, Bodnar A (2004) Nonlinear dynamics of an external cylindrical grinding system and a strategy for chatter compensation. Nonlinear Dyn Prod Syst. doi:10.1002/3527602585.ch11

    Google Scholar 

  30. Wang J, Sui Z, Tian Y, Wang X, Fang L (2015) A speed optimization algorithm based on the contour error model of lag synchronization for CNC cam grinding. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 80(5):1421–1432. doi:10.1007/s00170-015-7120-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Xl, Yao B, Feng W, Shen Zh, Wang Mm (2015) Modeling of a virtual grinding wheel based on random distribution of multi-grains and simulation of machine-process interaction. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A 16(11):874–884. doi:10.1631/jzus.A1400316

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We take this opportunity to thank the Institute of Production Engineering and Machine Tools (IFW) of the Leibniz Universität Hannover, where the grinding experiments were conducted. We further appreciate the funding of this project (KR2122-2/3) by the German Research Foundation (DFG), which was integrated in the Priority Program SPP 1180 “Prediction and Manipulation of Interactions between Structure and Process”. The authors are also grateful to the anonymous reviewers for their constructive criticisms which served to improve the paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute for Machine Elements, Engineering Design and Manufacturing, Technische Universität Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany

    K. M. de Payrebrune & M. Kröger

Authors
  1. K. M. de Payrebrune
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Kröger
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Kröger.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

de Payrebrune, K.M., Kröger, M. An integrated model of tool grinding: challenges, chances and limits of predicting process dynamics. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 10, 421–432 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-016-0687-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-016-0687-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation