Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Keyhole stability during laser welding—Part II: process pores and spatters

  • Production Process
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Spatters and pores that occur during laser deep penetration welding are unwanted defects that make post processing necessary. Therefore, these defects need to be avoided. The origin of pores and spatters are assumed to be in the process dynamics, especially the highly dynamic vapor channel. The keyhole is assumed to be responsible for producing these defects. Based on keyhole calculations from Part I, in this paper, calculated keyhole properties are correlated to pore and spatter formation observed during experiments. Spatters are recorded using a high speed camera and a spatter detection routine for measuring spatter speed, size and number per time. Pore number per time and pore sizes are detected using X-ray imaging after welding. Temporal spatter and pore characteristics can be correlated to dynamic values of the keyhole. The analytical model can predict spatter and pore formation depending on local frequencies and amplitudes in the keyhole. When using different beam profiles, extremely high local frequencies of the Top Hat beam at smaller keyhole dimensions seem to lead to an increased spatter and pore formation. The spring coefficient can be used as an indicator to predict spatter and pore characteristics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mizutani M, Katayama S (2003) Keyhole behavior and pressure distribution during laser irradiation on molten metal. In: Proceedings of the 22nd international congress on applications of lasers and electro-optics (ICALEO), LIA congress proceeding. Paper 1004

  2. Berger P, Hügel H, Graf T (2011) Understanding pore formation in laser beam welding. In: Schmidt M, Zaeh MF, Graf T, Ostendorf A (eds) Lasers in manufacturing (LIM), Physics Procedia, vol 12. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 241–247

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tsukamoto S, Kawaguchi I, Arakane G, Honda H (2002) Keyhole behavior in high power laser welding. In: Proceedings of the international congress on laser advanced materials processing (LAMP). International Society for Optics and Photonics

  4. Fabbro R, Slimani S, Doudet I, Coste F, Briand F (2006) Experimental study of the dynamical coupling between the induced vapour plume and the melt pool for Nd–Yag CW laser welding. J Phys D Appl Phys 39:394–400

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang M, Chen G, Zhou Y, Li S (2013) Direct observation of keyhole characteristics in deep penetration laser welding with a 10 kW fiber laser. Opt Express 21(17):19997–20004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Seto N, Katayama S, Matsunawa A (2000) Porosity formation mechanism and suppression procedure in laser welding of aluminium alloys. Q J Jpn Weld Soc 18:243–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Börner C, Dilger K, Rominger V, Harrer T, Krüssel T, Löwer T (2011) Influence of ambient pressure on spattering and weld seam quality in laser beam welding with the solid-state laser. In: Proceedings of 31st international congress on applications of lasers and electro-optics (ICALEO), LIA congress proceeding. Paper 1604

  8. Fabbro R (2009) Limiting process for keyhole propagation during deep penetration laser welding. In: Proceeding of 5th international congress on laser advanced materials processing (LAMP)

  9. Kawaguchi I, Tsukamoto S, Honda H, Arakane G (2003) Power modulation in deep penetration laser welding—optimization of frequency and waveform to prevent the porosity. In: Proceedings of 23rd international congress on applications of lasers and electro-optics (ICALEO), LIA congress proceeding. Paper 1006

  10. Volpp J, Vollertsen F (2016) Keyhole stability during laser welding—Part I: modeling and evaluation. Prod Eng Res Devel 10:443–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Volpp J, Vollertsen F (2015) Modeling keyhole oscillations during laser deep penetration welding at different spatial laser intensity distributions. Prod Eng Res Dev 9(2):167–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kaplan AFH, Powell J (2011) Spatter in laser welding. J Laser Appl 23(4):032005-1–032005-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Berger P, Schuster R, Hügel H, Graf T (2010) Moving humps at the capillary front in laser welding. In: Proceedings of the 30th international congress on applications of lasers and electro-optics (ICALEO), LIA congress proceeding. Paper 106

  14. Kaplan AFH (2015) Local flashing events at the keyhole front in laser welding. Opt Lasers Eng 68:35–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Boley M, Weber R, Graf T (2015) Online detection of pore formation during laser deep-penetration welding. In: Proceeding of lasers in manufacturing congress (LIM)

  16. Geiger M, Kägeler C, Schmidt M (2008) High-power laser welding of contaminated steel sheets. Prod Eng Res Dev 2:235–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was accomplished within the Center of Competence for Welding of Aluminum Alloys (Centr-Al). Funding by the DFG—Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (VO 530/52-2) is gratefully acknowledged. The “BIAS ID” numbers are part of the figures and allow the retraceability of the results with respect to mandatory documentation required by the funding organization.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Bremer Institut für angewandte Strahltechnik GmbH, Klagenfurter Straße 2, 28359, Bremen, Germany

    Jörg Volpp

Authors
  1. Jörg Volpp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jörg Volpp.

Appendix

Appendix

See Figs. 18, 19, 20, 21 and 22.

Fig. 18
figure 18

Spatters per second at different a welding velocities and b focal positions (based on reference parameters, Table 1; EN AW-1050)

Full size image
Fig. 19
figure 19

Spatter sizes at different a welding velocities and b focal positions (based on reference parameters, Table 1; EN AW-1050)

Full size image
Fig. 20
figure 20

Spatter speeds at different a welding velocities and b focal positions (based on reference parameters, Table 1; EN AW-1050)

Full size image
Fig. 21
figure 21

Pores per second at different a welding velocities and b focal positions (based on reference parameters, Table 1; EN AW-1050)

Full size image
Fig. 22
figure 22

Pore sizes at different a welding velocities and b focal positions (based on reference parameters, Table 1; EN AW-1050)

Full size image

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Volpp, J. Keyhole stability during laser welding—Part II: process pores and spatters. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 11, 9–18 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-016-0705-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-016-0705-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation