Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Applying forward and reverse cross-docking in a multi-product integrated supply chain network

  • Production Management
  • Published:
Production Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

To come up with today’s competitive priorities, companies are always looking for new ways to optimize their processes. Integrated forward/reverse supply chain management is treated as a necessary response to the call for corporate sustainability in logistics networks. Also, due to growing environmental and economic concerns, the recycling of used products is becoming a common practice. It is recently remarkable that applying cross-docking in forward logistics has been recognized as an important field of performance improvement, however, approaches to consider this strategy in the both forward and reverse contexts (simultaneously) are far lacking. To cover these gaps, this paper indicates how cross-docking can be efficiently implemented in a forward/reverse structure, and in this regards, proposes an integrated multi-product supply chain network. To study the problem, we firstly present a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) model to minimize total costs. Secondly, to solve the obtained model, we use the general algebraic modeling system (GAMS) software. Furthermore, the model performance is evaluated through comparing the case of using forward/reverse cross-docking with that of not applying this strategy (classical approach) in the network configuration—in terms of defining two theories. Finally, the significant outcomes resulted from utilizing forward/reverse cross-docking in the network are discussed. Considered the above requirements, the model increases the efficiency of the integrated forward/reverse logistics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Dondo RG, Méndez CA (2016) Operational planning of forward and reverse logistic activities on multi-echelon supply-chain networks. Comput Chem Eng 88:170–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Amiri A (2006) Designing a distribution network in a supply chain system: formulation and efficient solution procedure. Eur J Oper Res 171(2):567–576

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Kumar S, Putnam V (2008) Cradle to cradle: reverse logistics strategies and opportunities across three industry sectors. Int J Product Econ 115(2):305–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jayaraman V, Luo Y (2007) Creating competitive advantages through new value creation: a reverse logistics perspective. Acad Manag Perspect 21(2):56–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Fernández AD, Gil MJA, Torre PG (2004). Logística inversa y medio ambiente. McGraw-Hill

  6. Srivastava SK, Srivastava RK (2006) Managing product returns for reverse logistics. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 36(7):524–546

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Yu VF, Jewpanya P, Kachitvichyanukul V (2015). Particle swarm optimization for the multi-period cross-docking distribution problem with time windows. Int J Prod Res 1–17

  8. Ladier AL, Alpan G (2015) Cross-docking operations: current research versus industry practice. Omega

  9. Kheirkhah A, Rezaei S (2016). Using cross-docking operations in a reverse logistics network design: a new approach. Prod Eng 1–10

  10. Zuluaga JPS, Thiell M, Perales RC (2016). Reverse cross-docking. Omega

  11. Rezaei S, Kheirkhah A. A comprehensive approach in designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network using cross-docking operations. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 1–48

  12. Javid AA, Azad N (2010) Incorporating location, routing and inventory decisions in supply chain network design. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 46(5):582–597

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Park S, Lee TE, Sung CS (2010) A three-level supply chain network design model with risk-pooling and lead times. Transp Res Part E Logist Transp Rev 46(5):563–581

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Dowlatshahi S (2000) Developing a theory of reverse logistics. Interfaces 30(3):143–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Rubio S, Chamorro A, Miranda FJ (2008) Characteristics of the research on reverse logistics (1995–2005). Int J Prod Res 46(4):1099–1120

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Alpan G, Ladier AL, Larbi R, Penz B (2011) Heuristic solutions for transshipment problems in a multiple door cross docking warehouse. Comput Ind Eng 61(2):402–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Boysen N, Fliedner M (2010) Cross dock scheduling: classification, literature review and research agenda. Omega 38(6):413–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Ko HJ, Evans GW (2007) A genetic algorithm-based heuristic for the dynamic integrated forward/reverse logistics network for 3PLs. Comput Oper Res 34(2):346–366

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Pati RK, Vrat P, Kumar P (2008) A goal programming model for paper recycling system. Omega 36(3):405–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Zeballos LJ, Méndez CA, Barbosa-Povoa AP, Novais AQ (2014) Multi-period design and planning of closed-loop supply chains with uncertain supply and demand. Comput Chem Eng 66:151–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kalaitzidou MA, Longinidis P, Georgiadis MC (2015) Optimal design of closed-loop supply chain networks with multifunctional nodes. Comput Chem Eng 80:73–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Van Belle J, Valckenaers P, Cattrysse D (2012) Cross-docking: state of the art. Omega 40(6):827–846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lim A, Miao Z, Rodrigues B, Xu Z (2005) Transshipment through crossdocks with inventory and time windows. Naval Res Logist (NRL) 52(8):724–733

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  24. Musa R, Arnaout JP, Jung H (2010) Ant colony optimization algorithm to solve for the transportation problem of cross-docking network. Comput Ind Eng 59(1):85–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Ma H, Miao Z, Lim A, Rodrigues B (2011) Crossdocking distribution networks with setup cost and time window constraint. Omega 39(1):64–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Devika K, Jafarian A, Nourbakhsh V (2014) Designing a sustainable closed-loop supply chain network based on triple bottom line approach: a comparison of metaheuristics hybridization techniques. Eur J Oper Res 235(3):594–615

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Yang XS, Deb S (2013) Multi-objective cuckoo search for design optimization. Comput Oper Res 40(6):1616–1624

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. McWilliams DL (2010) Iterative improvement to solve the parcel hub scheduling problem. Comput Ind Eng 59(1):136–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tonanont A, Yimsiri S, Jitpitaklert W, Rogers KJ (2008) Performance evaluation in reverse logistics with data envelopment analysis. In: Proceedings of the 2008 Industrial Engineering Research Conference, pp 764–769

  30. Beamon BM (1999) Designing the green supply chain. Logistics information management 12(4):332–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Bu-ali Sina University, Hamedan, Iran

    Saeid Rezaei & Amirsaman Kheirkhah

Authors
  1. Saeid Rezaei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Amirsaman Kheirkhah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Saeid Rezaei.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Rezaei, S., Kheirkhah, A. Applying forward and reverse cross-docking in a multi-product integrated supply chain network. Prod. Eng. Res. Devel. 11, 495–509 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0743-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-017-0743-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation