Skip to main content
Log in

Automatic day time cloud detection over land and sea from MSG SEVIRI images using three features and two artificial intelligence approaches

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Signal, Image and Video Processing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A fuzzy logic and neural network approaches are proposed to generate a cloud mask for Meteosat Second Generation Spinning Enhanced Visible and Infrared Imager (MSG SEVIRI) images. MSG images are classified into land/sea clear sky or cloudy. A spatial and temporal properties of three solar channels (0.6, 0.8 and 1.6 \(\upmu \)m), and three thermal infrared channels (3.9, 6.2 and 10.8 \(\upmu \)m) are used for this aim. The proposed methods were tested and evaluated using seventy-two MSG images taken at different times and dates. The fuzzy logic method leads to cloud detection accuracy of 84.41%, and the neural network achieved an average accuracy of 99.69%. Our proposed methods detected not only thick clouds but also thin and the less bright clouds. To give more support to our results, we made a comparison between the proposed approaches and the cloud mask product which is one of the applications integrate into software package Satellite Application Facility to NoWCasting and Very Short Range Forecasting (SAFNWC/MSG) by the European Organisation for the Exploitation of Meteorological Satellites EUMETSAT applied on the same MSG data. The high average accuracy achieved by our neural network proposed method (and more less for fuzzy logic) demonstrates its effectiveness and robustness and also the utility to benefit of using the artificial intelligent techniques in remote sensing imagery applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Souza-Echer, M.P., Pereir-A, E.B., Bins, L.S., Andrade, M.A.R.: A simple method for the assessment of the cloud cover state in high-latitude regions by a ground-based digital camera. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 23(3), 437–447 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gordon, B.D., David, J.G., Sullivan, G.D.: Automatic estimation of cloud amount using computer vision. J. Atmos. Ocean. Technol. 9(1), 81–85 (1992)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu, Y., Xia, J., Shi, C.X., Hong, Y.: An improved cloud classification algorithm for China’s FY-2C multi-channel images using artificial neural network. Sensors 9(7), 5558–5579 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ghosh, A., Pal, N.R., Das, J.: A fuzzy rule based approach to cloud cover estimation. Remote Sens. Environ. 100(4), 531–549 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Schmetz, J., Pili, P., Tjemkes, S., Just, D., Kerkann, J., Rota, S., Ratier, A.: An introduction to Meteosat second generation (MSG). Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc. 83(7), 977–992 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Taravat, A., Proud, S., Peronaci, S., Del Frate, F., Oppelt, N.: Multilayer perceptron neural networks model for meteosat second generation SEVIRI daytime cloud masking. Remote Sens. 7(2), 1529–1539 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Taravat, A., Peronaci, S., Sist, M., Del Frate, F., Oppelt, N.: The combination of band rationing techniques and neural networks algorithms for MSG SEVIRI and Landsat ETM+ cloud masking. In: Geoscience and Remote Sensing Symposium (IGARSS), pp. 2315–2318. IEEE (2015)

  8. Saunders, R.W., Kriebel, K.T.: An improved method for detecting clear sky and cloudy radiances from AVHRR data. Int. J. Remote Sens. 9(1), 123–150 (1988)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Derrien, M., Le Gléau, H.: MSG/SEVIRI cloud mask and type from SAFNWC. Int. J. Remote Sens. 26(21), 4707–4732 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Bley, S., Deneke, H.: A threshold-based cloud mask for the high-resolution visible channel of Meteosat second generation SEVIRI. Atmos. Meas. Tech. 6(10), 2713–2723 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Seze, G., Debois, M.: Cloud cover analysis from satellite imagery using spatial and temporal characteristics of the data. J. Clim. Appl. Meteorol. 26(2), 287–303 (1987)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amato, U., Antoniadis, A., Cuomo, V., Cutillo, L., Franzese, M., Murino, L., Serio, C.: Statistical cloud detection from SEVIRI multispectral images. Remote Sens. Environ. 112(3), 750–766 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Asmala, A., Shaun, Q.: Cloud masking for remotely sensed data using spectral and principal components analysis. ETASR Eng. Technol. Appl. Sci. Res. 2(3), 221–225 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Tapakis, R., Charalambides, A.G.: Equipment and methodologies for cloud detection and classification: a review. Sol. Energy 95, 392–430 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Key, J.R., Maslanik, J.A., Barry, R.G.: Cloud classification from satellite data using a fuzzy sets algorithm: a polar example. Int. J. Remote Sens. 10(12), 1823–1842 (1989)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tovinkere, V.R., Penaloza, M., Logar, A., Lee, J., Weger, R.C., Berendes, T.A., Welch, R.M.: An intercomparison of artificial intelligence approaches for polar scene identification. J. Geophys. Res. 98(D3), 5001–5016 (1993)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Simpson, J.J., Keller, R.H.: An improved fuzzy logic segmentation of sea ice, clouds, and ocean in remotely sensed arctic imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 54(3), 290–312 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Baum, B.A., Tovinkere, V., Titlow, J., Welch, R.M.: Automated cloud classification of global AVHRR data using a fuzzy logic approach. J. Appl. Meteorol. 36(11), 1519–1540 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee, J., Weger, R.C., Sengupta, S.K., Welch, R.M.: A neural network approach to cloud classification. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 28(5), 846–855 (1990)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ackerman, S.A., Strabala, K.I., Menzel, W.P., Frey, R.A., Moeller, C.C., Gumley, L.E.: Discriminating clear sky from clouds with MODIS. J. Geophys. Res. 103(D24), 32–141 (1998)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Platnick, S., King, M.D., Ackerman, S.A., Menzel, W.P., Baum, B.A., Riédi, J.C., Frey, R.A.: The MODIS cloud products: algorithms and examples from Terra. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 41(2), 459–473 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Zhu, Z., Woodcock, C.E.: Object-based cloud and cloud shadow detection in Landsat imagery. Remote Sens. Environ. 118, 83–94 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Hocking, J., Francis, P.N., Saunders, R.: Cloud detection in Meteosat Second Generation imagery at the Met Office. Meteorol. Appl. 18(3), 307–323 (2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Simpson, J.J., Jin, Z., Stitt, J.R.: Cloud shadow detection under arbitrary viewing and illumination conditions. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 38(2), 972–976 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. http://www.nwcsaf.org/HD/MainNS.jsp

  26. ftp://iacftp.ethz.ch/pub_read/giuntai/SAF-NWC-CDOP-INM-SW-SUM-2_v6.0.pdf

  27. Nair, M.S., Lakshmanan, R., Wilscy, M., Tatavarti, R.: Fuzzy logic-based automatic contrast enhancement of satellite images of ocean. SIViP 5(1), 69–80 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bose, A., Mali, K.: Fuzzy-based artificial bee colony optimization for gray image segmentation. Signal Image Video Proc. 10(6), 1089–1096 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gharieb, R.R., Gendy, G., Abdelfattah, A.: C-means clustering fuzzified by two membership relative entropy functions approach incorporating local data information for noisy image segmentation. SIViP 11(3), 541–548 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Kumar, Y., Dewal, M.L., Anand, R.S.: Epileptic seizures detection in EEG using DWT-based ApEn and artificial neural network. SIViP 8(7), 1323–1334 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Lensky, I.M., Rosenfeld, D.: Clouds-aerosols-precipitation satellite analysis tool (CAPSAT). Atmos. Chem. Phys. 8(22), 6739–6753 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Reuter, M., Thomas, W., Albert, P., Lockhoff, M., Weber, R., Karlsson, K.G., Fischer, J.: The CM-SAF and FUB cloud detection schemes for SEVIRI: validation with synoptic data and initial comparison with MODIS and CALIPSO. J. Appl. Meteorol. Climatol. 48(2), 301–316 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Karlsson, K.G., Dybbroe, A.: Evaluation of arctic cloud products from the EUMETSAT climate monitoring satellite application facility based on CALIPSO-CALIOP observations. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 10(4), 1789–1807 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Jang, J.D., Viau, A.A., Anctil, F., Bartholomé, E.: Neural network application for cloud detection in SPOT VEGETATION images. Int. J. Remote Sens. 27(4), 719–736 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors would also like to thank: The European Organisation for the Exploration of Meteorological Satellites EUMETSAT for providing all the MSG SEVIRI used in this work. The State Meteorological Agency AEMET SPAIN to give us access to the SAFNWC/MSG software.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mourad Reguiegue.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Reguiegue, M., Chouireb, F. Automatic day time cloud detection over land and sea from MSG SEVIRI images using three features and two artificial intelligence approaches. SIViP 12, 189–196 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-017-1145-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11760-017-1145-0

Keywords

Navigation