Abstract
This paper proposes a Capabilities-based Approach to guide hazard mitigation efforts. First, a discussion is provided of the criteria that should be met by an adequate framework for formulating public policy and allocating resources. This paper shows why a common decision-aiding tool, Cost-benefit Analysis, fails to fulfill such criteria. A Capabilities-based Approach to hazard mitigation is then presented, drawing on the framework originally developed in the context of development economics and policy. The focus of a Capabilities-based Approach is protecting and promoting the well-being of individuals. Capabilities are dimensions of well-being and specified in terms of functionings. Functionings capture the various things of value an individual does or becomes in his or her life, including being alive, being healthy, and being sheltered. Capabilities refer to the real achievability of specific functionings. In the context of hazard mitigation, from a Capabilities-based Approach, decision- and policy-makers should consider the acceptability and tolerability of risks along with the affectability of hazards when determining policy formulation and resource allocation. Finally, the paper shows how the proposed approach satisfies the required criteria, and overcomes the limitations of Cost-benefit Analysis, while maintaining its strengths.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
This is evidenced by the following statistic. “In the 1970s, natural disasters alone claimed nearly 2 million lives. By the 1990s, even though the occurrence of disasters was greater, fatalities had fallen to under 800,000. This shows that it is possible to reduce the loss of life, although the total number of people affected by disasters did increase markedly.” (Paper prepared by FAO for the second international conference on early warning).
Gardoni, P., Murphy, C., & Sanchez-Silva, M., (2006). The practical implementation of a capabilities-based approach to measuring the societal impacts of natural and man-made hazards. Risk Analysis (Submitted).
Murphy, C. & Gardoni, P. (2006). The acceptability and the tolerability of risks: A capabilities-based approach. Science & Engineering Ethics (Submitted).
Gardoni, P. & Murphy, C. (2006). A capabilities-based approach to measuring the societal impacts of natural and man-made hazards. Natural Hazard Review (Submitted).
References
Petak, W. J., & Atkisson, A. A. (1982). Natural hazard risk assessment and public policy: Anticipating the unexpected. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
Kaplan S., & Gerrick B. J. (1981). On the quantitative definition of risk. Risk Analysis, 1, 11–27.
Rowe, W. D. (1980). Risk assessment: Theoretical approaches and methodological problems. In J. Conrad (Ed.), Society, technology, and risk assessment (pp. 3–29). New York: Academic Press.
Vose, D. (2000). Risk analysis: A quantitative guide. New York, NY: Wiley.
Bedford, T., & Cooke, R. (2001). Probabilistic risk analysis: Foundations and methods. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Finkel, A. M. (1990). Confronting uncertainty in risk management: A guide for decision-makers. Center for Risk Management, Washington, DC.
Paté-Cornell, M. E. (1996). Uncertainties in risk analysis: Six levels of treatment. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 54, 95–111.
Irwin, A., Smith, D., & Griffiths, R. (1982). Risk analysis and public policy for major hazards. Physical Technology, 13, 258–265.
Merkhoffer, M. W. (1987). Decision science and social risk management: A comparative evaluation of cost-benefit analysis, decision analysis, and other formal decision-aiding approaches. Dordrecht, Holland: D, Reidel Publishing Company.
MacLean D. (Ed.) (1986). Values at risk. Towata, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
Prater, C. S., & Lindell, M. K. (2000). Politics of hazard mitigation. Natural Hazard Review, 1(2), 73–82.
Markovits, R. S. (2005). Review of Matthew D. Alder and Eric A. Posner (eds.) Cost-benefit analysis: Legal, economic, and philosophical perspectives. Ethics, 115(3), 593–598.
Fischhoff, B., Slovic, P., & Lichtenstein, S. (1979). Weighing the risks: Which risks are acceptable. Environment, 2(4), 17–20, 32–38.
Anderson, E. (1988). Values, risks, and market norms. Philosophy and Public Affairs, 17(1), 54–65.
May, P. J. (2001). Societal perspectives about earthquake performance: The fallacy of “acceptable risk”. Earthquake Spectra, 17(4), 725–737.
Sunstein, C. R. (2005). Cost-benefit analysis and the environment. Ethics, 115, 351–385.
Adler, M. D., & Posner, E. A. (2006). New foundations of cost-benefit analysis. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Ackerman, F., & Heinzerling, L. (2003). Priceless: On knowing the price of everything and the value of nothing. NY: New Press.
Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., & Rabins, M. J. (2005). Engineering ethics: Concepts & cases (3rd ed.). Belmont: Wadsworth Press.
Paté, M. E. (1983). Acceptable decision processes and acceptable risks in public sector regulations. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 13(3), 113–124.
Baier, A. (1986). Poisoning the wells. In D. MacLean (Ed.), Values at risk. Totowa, NJ: Rowman & Allanheld.
Smidtz, D. (2001). A place for cost-benefit analysis. Philosophical Issues, 11, 148–171.
Sen, A. (1989). Development as capabilities expansion. Journal of Development Planning, 19, 41–58.
Sen, A. (1993). Capability and well-being. In M. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 30–53). Oxford, United Kingdom: Clarendon Press.
Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor Books.
Sen, A. (1999). Commodities and capabilities. New York: Oxford University Press.
Sen, A. (2004). Elements of a theory of human rights. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 32(4), 315–356.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Women and human development: The capabilities approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Nussbaum, M. (2000). Aristotle, politics, and human capabilities: A response to Antony, Arneson, Charlesworth, and Mulgan. Ethics, 111(1), 102–140.
Anand, S., & Sen, A. (2000). The income component of the human development index. Journal of Human Development, 1(1), 83–106.
Raworth, K., & Stewart, D. (2003). Critiques of the human development index: A review. In S. Fukuda-Parr & A. K. Shiva Kumar (Eds.), Readings in human development (pp. 140–152). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Fukuda-Parr, S., & Shiva Kumar, A. K. (Eds.) (2003). Readings in human development (pp. 128–139). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Clements, P. (1995). A poverty-oriented cost-benefit approach to the analysis of development projects. World Development, 23(4), 577–592.
Murphy, C., & Gardoni, P. (2006). The role of society in engineering risk analysis: A capabilities-based approach. Risk Analysis, 26(4), 1085–1095.
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful for the very helpful comments they received from Mrs. Kathleen Murphy.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Murphy, C., Gardoni, P. Determining Public Policy and Resource Allocation Priorities for Mitigating Natural Hazards: A Capabilities-based Approach. Sci Eng Ethics 13, 489–504 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9019-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-007-9019-4