Abstract
There has been increasing interest in developing practical, non-theoretical tools for analyzing ethical problems in public health, biomedicine, and other scientific disciplines so that professionals can make and justify ethical decisions in their own research or practice. Tools for ethical decisionmaking, together with case studies on ethics, are often used in graduate education programs and in continuing professional education. Students can benefit from opportunities to further develop their analytical skills, to recognize ethical issues, and to develop their moral sensitivity. One practical approach for illustrating and facilitating ethical analysis uses cases with contrary facts and circumstances, an approach which complements rather than replaces theoretical approaches to moral reasoning. Cases with contrary facts and circumstances are presented in two or more alternative ways so that the facts, circumstances, or framing of one version runs counter to that of the other version (s). Cases with contrary facts, together with practical steps for identifying and analyzing ethical issues, are likely to be useful tools for illustrating and facilitating ethics analysis and stimulating the moral imagination.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Coughlin, S. S., Soskolne, C. L., & Goodman, K. W. (1997). Case analysis and moral reasoning. In S. S. Coughlin, C. L. Soskolne, & K. W. Goodman (Eds.), Case studies in public health ethics (pp. 1–18). Washington, DC: American Public Health Association.
Heitman, E. (2002). Using cases in the study of ethics. In R. F. Bulger, E. Heitman, & S. J. Reiser (Eds.), The ethical dimensions of the biological and health sciences (2nd ed., pp. 349–364). New York: Cambridge University Press.
Jennings, B. (2003). Introduction: A strategy for discussing ethical issues in public health. In Association of Schools of Public Health. Ethics and public health: Model curriculum (pp. 1–12) http://www.asph.org/document.cfm?page=782 (accessed 28 July 2006).
Howard, D. E., Lothen-Kline, C., & Boekeloo, B. O. (2004). Using the case-study methodology to teach ethics to public health students. Health Promotion Practice, 5, 151–159.
Soskolne, C. L., & Sieswerda, L. E. (2003). Implementing ethics in the professions: Examples from environmental epidemiology. Science of the Total Environment, 9, 181–190.
Herkert, J. R. (2005). Ways of thinking about and teaching ethical problem solving: Microethics and macroethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11, 373–385.
Lozano, J. F., Palau-Salvador, G., Gozalvez, V., & Boni, A. (2006). The use of moral dilemmas for teaching agricultural engineers. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12, 327–334.
Rest, J. R. (1994). Background: Theory and research. In J. R. Rest & D. Narvaez (Eds.), Moral development in the professions: Psychology and applied ethics (pp. 1–26). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale.
Callahan, D., & Bok, S. (Eds). (1980). Ethics teaching in higher education. New York: Plenum Press.
Beauchamp, T. L., & Childress, J. F. (2001). Principles of biomedical ethics (5th ed.). New York: Oxford University Press.
Jonsen, A. R., & Toulmin, S. E. (1988). The abuse of casuistry. Berkeley, California: University of California Press.
Arras, J. D. (1994). Principles and particularity: The role of cases in bioethics. Indiana Law Journal, 69, 983–1014.
Clouser, K. D. (1995). Common morality as an alternative to principlism. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 5, 219–236.
Gert, B. (2006). Making the morally relevant features explicit: A response to Carson Strong. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 16, 59–71.
Alkire, S., & Chen, L. (2004). Global health and moral values. British Medical Journal, 364, 1069–1074.
Beauchamp, T. L. (1996). Moral foundations. In S. S. Coughlin & T. L. Beauchamp (Eds.), Ethics and epidemiology (pp. 24–52). New York: Oxford University Press.
Swazey, J., & Bird, S. J. (1997). Teaching and learning research ethics. In D. Elliott & J. E. Stern (Eds.), Research ethics: A reader (pp. 1–19). Hanover: University Press of New England.
Pimple, K. D. (1995). General issues in teaching research ethics. In R. L. Penslar (Ed.), Research ethics. Cases & materials (pp. 3–12). Indiana: Indiana University Press Bloomington.
Ten Have, H., & Ang, W. T. (2007). UNESCO’s global ethics observatory. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 15–16.
Bebeau, M. J., Rest, J. R., & Narvaez, D. (1999). Beyond the promise: A perspective on research in moral education. Educational Researcher, 28, 18–26.
Coughlin, S. S. (1996). Model curricula in public health ethics. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 12, 247–251.
Pellegrino, E. D. (1989). Teaching medical ethics: Some persistent questions and some responses. Academic Medicine, 64, 701–703.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
The findings and conclusions in this article are those of the author and do not necessarily represent the views of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Coughlin, S.S. Using Cases with Contrary Facts to Illustrate and Facilitate Ethical Analysis. Sci Eng Ethics 14, 103–110 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9055-8
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9055-8