Abstract
Ethics requires good science. Many scientists, government leaders, and industry representatives support tripling of global-nuclear-energy capacity on the grounds that nuclear fission is “carbon free” and “releases no greenhouse gases.” However, such claims are scientifically questionable (and thus likely to lead to ethically questionable energy choices) for at least 3 reasons. (i) They rely on trimming the data on nuclear greenhouse-gas emissions (GHGE), perhaps in part because flawed Kyoto Protocol conventions require no full nuclear-fuel-cycle assessment of carbon content. (ii) They underestimate nuclear-fuel-cycle releases by erroneously assuming that mostly high-grade uranium ore, with much lower emissions, is used. (iii) They inconsistently compare nuclear-related GHGE only to those from fossil fuels, rather than to those from the best GHG-avoiding energy technologies. Once scientists take account of (i)–(iii), it is possible to show that although the nuclear fuel cycle releases (per kWh) much fewer GHG than coal and oil, nevertheless it releases far more GHG than wind and solar-photovoltaic. Although there may be other, ethical, reasons to support nuclear tripling, reducing or avoiding GHG does not appear to be one of them.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Pacala, S., & Socolow, R. (2004). Stabilization wedges: Solving the climate problem for the next 50 years with current technologies. Science, 305(5686), 968–972. doi:10.1126/science.1100103.
Johnson, R. S. (2008). Nuclear energy: Securing Our Energy future. Washington, DC: US DOE.
Smith, B. (2006). Insurmountable risks: The dangers of using nuclear power to combat global climate change. Takoma Park: IEER Press.
US Department of Energy (DOE). (2001). A roadmap to deploy new nuclear power plants in the United States by 2010: volume I summary report. Washington, DC: US DOE.
Deller, N., Makhijani, A., & Burroughs, J. (2003). Rule of power or rule of law? An assessment of the US policies and actions regarding security-related treaties (pp. 106–110). New York: Apex Press.
van Leeuwen, W. S. (2007). Secure energy? Civil nuclear power, security, and global warming. In F. Barnaby & J. Kemp (Eds.), CO 2 emissions from nuclear power (pp. 40–44). London: Oxford Research Group.
Meserve, R. (2004). Global warming and nuclear power. Science, 303(5657), 433. doi:10.1126/science.303.5657.433.
US Department of Energy (DOE). (2008). President Bush requests $25 billion for US department of energy’s FY 2009 budget. Washington, DC: US DOE Office of Public Affairs.
Nuclear Energy Institute (NEI). (2007). Nuclear Statistics. Washington, DC: NEI. http://www.nei.org/resourcesandstats/nuclear_statistics/costs. Accessed 15 Feb 2008.
Bunyard, P. (2006). Ecologist: Taking the wind out of nuclear power. Pacific Ecologist, 11(Summer), 51–57.
Butler, D. (2004). Energy: Nuclear power’s new dawn. Nature, 429(6989), 238–240. doi:10.1038/429238a.
Sovacool, B. K. (2008). Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey. Energy Policy, 36, 2940–2953.
Fthenakis, V. M., & Kim, H. C. (2007). Greenhouse-gas emission from solar-electric and nuclear power: A life-cycle study. Energy Policy, 35(4), 2549–2557. doi:10.1016/j.enpol.2006.06.022.
Barnaby, F., & Kemp, J. (2007). Too hot to handle? The future of civil nuclear power. In F. Barnaby & J. Kemp (Eds.), Executive summary (pp. 7–14). London: Oxford Research Group.
Sovacool, B. K. (2008). Valuing the greenhouse gas emissions from nuclear power: A critical survey. Energy Policy, 36, 2940–2953.
Hagen, R. E., Moens, J. R., & Nikodem, Z. D. (2001). Impact of U.S. nuclear generation on greenhouse gas emissions. Washington, DC: Energy Information Administration of the US Department of Energy.
Makhijani, A. (2007). Carbon-free and nuclear-free. Takoma Park, MD: IEER.
Ho, M. W., Bunyard, P., Saunders, P., Bravo, E., & Gala, R. (2006). Which energy? London: Institute for Science and Society.
van Leeuwen, W. S. (2006). Energy security and uranium reserves. London: Oxford Research Group.
Barnham, K. (2007). Secure energy? Civil nuclear power, security, and global warming. In F. Barnaby & J. Kemp (Eds.), If not nuclear, then what? (pp. 45–50). London: Oxford Research Group.
World Information Service on Energy (WISE), & Nuclear Information Research Service (NIRS). (2005). Nuclear power: No solution to climate change. Tacoma Park, MD: WISE/NIRS.
Reichhardt, T. (1997). No net cost in cutting carbon emissions. Nature, 389(6650), 429. doi:10.1038/38841.
Makhijani, A. (2008). A reliable electricity grid in the United States. Science for Democratic Action, 15(2), 9–11.
Kennedy, J., Zsiga, A., Conheady, L., & Lund, P. (2006). Credit aspects of North American and European nuclear power. Standard & Poor’s, January 9.
European Council on Renewable Energy (ECRE). (2004). Renewable energy scenario, 2040. Gussing, Austria: ECRE.
Shell International. (2001). Energy needs, choices, possibilities: scenarios to 2050. Global Business Environment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Shrader-Frechette, K.S. Data Trimming, Nuclear Emissions, and Climate Change. Sci Eng Ethics 15, 19–23 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9097-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-008-9097-y