Skip to main content
Log in

Civil Engineering at the Crossroads in the Twenty-First Century

  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The twenty-first century presents a major challenge for civil engineering. The magnitude and future importance of some of the problems perceived by society are directly related to the field of the civil engineer, implying an inescapable burden of responsibility for a group whose technical soundness, rational approach and efficiency is highly valued and respected by the citizen. However, the substantial changes in society and in the way it perceives the problems that it considers important call for a thorough review of our structures, both professional and educational; so that our profession, with its undeniable historical prestige, may modernize certain approaches and attitudes in order to continue to be a reliable instrument in the service of society, giving priority from an ethical standpoint to its actions in pursuit of “the public good”. It possesses important tools to facilitate this work (new technologies, the development of communications, the transmission of scientific thought.···); but there is nevertheless a need for deep reflection on the very essence of civil engineering: what we want it to be in the future, and the ability and willingness to take the lead at a time when society needs disinterested messages, technically supported, reasonably presented and dispassionately transmitted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • ASCE. (2010). La Visión para la Ingeniería Civil en 2025.

  • Bilbao, G., Fuertes, J., & Guibert, J. M. (2006). Etica para ingenieros (pp. 315). Paris: Ed. Desclee de Brouwer.

  • Dewey, J. (1930). Individualism old and new. New York: Minton, Balch and Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Florman, S. (1997). Non-technical studies for engineers: The challenge of relevance. European Journal of English Education, 22(3), 249–258.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kindelán E. M. P., & Martín, A. M. (2008). Engineers of 21st century: The importance of communication and strategic training in the engineers educational and professional spheres. Arbor: Ciencia, pensamiento y cultura, ISSN 0210-1963, N 732.

  • Lynch, D. R., & Russell, J. S. (2009). Experiential learning in engineering practice. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, ASCE, 135(1), pp. 31–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortega, & Gasset, J. (2000). Meditación de la técnica (pp. 110). Ed. Alianza.

  • Trevelyan, J., & Tilli, S. (2007). Published research on engineering work. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 133(4), pp. 300–307.

  • Valero Matas, J. (2009). Los cuerpos intermedios: Agentes para la consolidación de la democracia. Revista Profesiones.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andres Seco.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ramírez, F., Seco, A. Civil Engineering at the Crossroads in the Twenty-First Century. Sci Eng Ethics 18, 681–687 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9258-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-011-9258-2

Keywords

Navigation