Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Gaming, Texting, Learning? Teaching Engineering Ethics Through Students’ Lived Experiences With Technology

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper examines how young peoples’ lived experiences with personal technologies can be used to teach engineering ethics in a way which facilitates greater engagement with the subject. Engineering ethics can be challenging to teach: as a form of practical ethics, it is framed around future workplace experience in a professional setting which students are assumed to have no prior experience of. Yet the current generations of engineering students, who have been described as ‘digital natives’, do however have immersive personal experience with digital technologies; and experiential learning theory describes how students learn ethics more successfully when they can draw on personal experience which give context and meaning to abstract theories. This paper reviews current teaching practices in engineering ethics; and examines young people’s engagement with technologies including cell phones, social networking sites, digital music and computer games to identify social and ethical elements of these practices which have relevance for the engineering ethics curricula. From this analysis three case studies are developed to illustrate how facets of the use of these technologies can be drawn on to teach topics including group work and communication; risk and safety; and engineering as social experimentation. Means for bridging personal experience and professional ethics when teaching these cases are discussed. The paper contributes to research and curriculum development in engineering ethics education, and to wider education research about methods of teaching ‘the net generation’.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abraham, S., Knies, A., Kukral, K., & Willis, T. (1997). Experiences in discussing ethics with undergraduate engineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 86(4), 305–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acharya, M., Davis, M., & Weil, V. (1995). Integrating ethics into a research experience for undergraduates. Journal of Engineering Education, 84(2), 129–132.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, C. (2004). Grammys take hard-line approach against online music piracy. Advertising Age, 75(6), 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barry, B., & Ohland, M. (2009). Applied ethics in the engineering, health, business, and law professions. A Comparison. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(4), 377–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, E., Moskal, B., & Gosink, J. (2007). Faculty and student attitudes toward community service: A comparative analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 96(2), 129–140.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, S., Maton, K., & Kervin, L. (2008). The ‘digital natives’ debate: A critical review of the evidence. British Journal of Educational Technology, 39(5), 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergman, F. (2004). Napster and the music industry. Working paper. Barcelona: ESADE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bijker, W., Hughes, T., & Pinch, T. (Eds.). (1989). The social construction of technological systems: New directions in the sociology and history of technology. Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Billington, D. (2006). Teaching ethics in engineering education through historical analysis. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(2), 205–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bonwell, C., & Eison, J. (1991). Active learning: Creating excitement in the classroom AEHE-ERIC higher education report No. 1. Washington, D.C.: Jossey-Bass.

  • Bouville, M. (2008). On using ethical theories to teach engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 15(1), 111–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyd, D. (2006). Friends, friendsters and myspace top 8: Writing community into being on social network sites. First Monday, 11(12). URL: http://firstmonday.org/htbin/cgiwrap/bin/ojs/index.php/fm/article/view/1418/1336. Accessed 6 May 2012.

  • Cassell, J., & Cramer, M. (2008). High tech or high risk: Moral panic about girls online. In T. McPherson (Ed.), Digital youth, innovation and the unexpected. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cifaldi, F. (2011, August 3). World of warcraft subscriptions continue to decline, though more slowly. Gamasutra. URL: http://www.gamasutra.com/view/news/36351/World_of_Warcraft_Subscriptions_Continue_To_Decline_Though_More_Slowly.php. Accessed 6 May 2012.

  • Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education”. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 327–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. (2006). Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion. Science and Engineering Ethics, 12(4), 717–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devon, R. (1999). Toward a social ethics of engineering: The norms of engagement. Journal of Engineering Education, 88, 87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York: MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dym, C., Agogino, A., Eris, O., Frey, D., & Leifer, L. (2005). Engineering, design thinking, teaching and learning. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 103–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, T. (2011, September 20). The game’s industry’s massive fail: Where are all the Minecraft clones? PC Gamer. URL: http://www.pcgamer.com/2011/09/20/the-game’s-industry’s-massive-fail-where-are-all-the-minecraft-clones/. Accessed 6 May 2012.

  • Feisel, L., & Rosa, A. (2005). The role of the laboratory in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(1), 121–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Felder, R., & Silverman, L. (1998). Learning and teaching styles in engineering education. Engineer Education, 78(7), 674–681.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finn, J. (2004). A survey of online harassment at a university campus. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19(4), 468–483.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flowers, S. (2008). Harnessing the hackers: The emergence of outlaw innovation. Research Policy, 37(2), 177–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorman, M. (2001). Transforming the engineering curriculum: Lessons learned from a summer at Boeing. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 143–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenhow, C., Robelia, B., & Hughes, J. (2009). Web 2.0 and classroom research: What path should we take now? Educational Researcher, 38(4), 246–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gross, R., & Acquisti. A. (2005). Information revelation and privacy in online social networks. Paper presented at the ACM Workshop in privacy in the Electronic Society, Alexandria, VA.

  • Harris, C., Davis, J., Pritchard, M., & Rabins, M. (1996). Engineering ethics: What? why? how? and when? Journal of Engineering Education, 85, 93–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haws, D. (2001). Ethics instruction in engineering education: A (Mini) meta-analysis. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(2), 223–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herkert, J. (2002). Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education. The Bridge, 32(3), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heverley, R. (2008). Growing up digital: Control and pieces of digital life. In T. McPherson (Ed.), Digital youth, innovation and the unexpected’. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinduja, S., & Patchin, J. (2008). Cyberbullying: An exploratory analysis of factors related to offending and victimization. Deviant Behavior, 29(2), 129–156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirsch, P., Linsenmeier, J., Smith, H., & Walker, J. (2005). Enhancing core competency learning in an integrated summer research experience for bioengineers. Journal of Engineering Education, 11(2), 257–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jelfs, A., & Colbourn, C. (2002). Virtual seminars and their input on the role of the teaching staff. Computers & Education, 38, 127–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeppesen, L., & Molin, M. (2003). Consumers as Co-developers: Learning and innovation outside the firm. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 15(3), 363–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen, D., Shen, D., Marra, R., Cho, Y., Lo, J., & Lohani, V. (2009). Engaging and supporting problem solving in engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 235–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., Ruslan, R., Cross, S., & Healing, G. (2010). Net generation or digital natives? Is there a distinct new generation entering university? Computers & Education, 54(3), 722–732.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R., & Pinch, T. (1996). Taking the black box off its wheels: the social construction of the automobile in rural America. Technology and Culture, 37, 776–799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knox, R., Sabatini, D., Sack, R., Haskins, R., Roach, L., & Fairbairn, S. (1995). A practitioner-educator partnership for teaching engineering design. Journal of Engineering Education, 84, 5–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolb, A., & Kolb, D. (2005). Learning styles and learning spaces: Enhancing experiential learning in higher education. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 4(2), 193–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laditka, S., & Houck, M. (2006). Student-developed case studies: An experiential approach for teaching ethics in management. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(2), 157–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lau, A. (2004). Teaching engineering ethics to first-year college students. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 359–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichenstein, G., Loshbaugh, H., Claar, B., Chen, H., Jackson, K., & Sheppard, S. (2009). An engineering major does not (necessarily) an engineer make: Career decision making among undergraduate engineering majors. Journal of Engineering Education, 98(3), 227–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lincourt, J., & Johnson, R. (2004). Ethics training: A genuine dilemma for engineering educators. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 353–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livingstone, S. (2008). Taking risky opportunities in youthful content creation: teenagers’ use of social networking sites for intimacy, privacy and self-expression. New Media and Society, 10(3), 393–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lloyd, P., & van de Poel, I. (2008). Designing games to teach ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 14(3), 433–447.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loui, M. (2005). Ethics and the development of professional identities of engineering students. Journal of Engineering Education, 94(4), 383–390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Madden, M., & Lenhart, A. (2004). Sharp decline in music file swappers. Pew Internet and American Life Centre.

  • Martin, M. (2002). Personal meaning and ethics in engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 8(4), 545–560.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, M., & Schinzinger R. (2005). Engineering as social experimentation, in ethics in engineering (pp. 88–115) . New York: McGraw-Hill.

  • Mason, A., & Weller, P. (2000). Factors affecting students’ satisfaction on a web course. Australian Journal of Educational Technology, 16(2), 173–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • McDonald, G. M., & Donleavey, G. (1995). Objectives in the teaching of business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 10(1), 829–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menkel-Meadow, C. (2000). Telling stories in school: Using case studies and stories to teach legal ethics”. Fordham Law Review, 69, 787–816.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moessner, C. (2007). Trends and ‘tudes: Cyber bullying in youth. Harris Interactive, 6(4), 145–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • NESTA. (2009). Youth-led innovation. London: National Endowment of Science, Technology and the Arts.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 343–351.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patchin, J., & Hinduja, S. (2010). Trends in online social networking: Adolescent use of MySpace over time. New Media and Society, 12(2), 197–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2010). Teens and Mobile Phones. Pew Research Center.

  • Pew Research Center. (2010). Millenials: A portrait of generation next. Pew Research Center.

  • Pfatteicher, S. (2001). Teaching versus preaching: EC2000 and the engineering ethics dilemma. Journal of Engineering Education, 90(1), 137–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prügl, R., & Schreier, M. (2006). Learning from leading-edge customers at the sims: Opening up the innovation process using toolkits. R&D Management, 36(3), 237–250.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rabins, M. (1998). Teaching engineering ethics to undergraduates: Why? what? how? Science and Engineering Ethics, 4(3), 291–302.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, W. (1977). An anatomy of risk. New York: Riley & Sons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sandvig, C. (2008). Wireless play and unexpected innovation. In T. McPherson (Ed.), Digital youth, innovation and the unexpected. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Santi, P. (2000). Ethics exercises for civil. Environmental and Geological Engineers, Journal of Engineering Education, 89(2), 151–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheurwater, G., & Doorman, S. (2001). Introducing ethics and engineering: The case of Delft University of Technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 7(2), 261–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schlossberger, E. (1995). Technology and civil disobedience: Why engineers have a special duty to obey the law. Science and Engineering Ethics, 1(2), 163–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simonson, L. (2005). Introducing ethics across the curriculum at South Dakota school of mines and technology. Science and Engineering Ethics, 11(4), 55–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sims, R. (2002). Business ethics teaching for effective learning. Teaching Business Ethics, 6, 393–410.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slovic, P., Fischoff, B., & Lichenstein, S. (1980). Risky Assumptions. Psychology Today, 14, 44–48.

  • Smart, K., & Csapo, N. (2007, December). Learning by doing: Engaging students through learner-centred activities. Business Communication Quarterly, 70(4), 451–457.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smolarski, D., & Whitehead, T. (2002). Ethics in the classroom: A reflection on integrating ethical discussions in an introductory course in computer programming. Science and Engineering Ethics, 6(2), 255–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Springer, L., Stanne, M., & Donovan, S. (1999). Measuring the success of small-group learning in college level SMET teaching: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 69, 21–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vesilind, P. (1996). Using academic integrity to teach engineering ethics. Journal of Engineering Education, 85(1), 41–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • von Hippel, E. (2005). Democratising innovation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolack, J., Mitchell, K., & Finkelhor, P. (2007). Does online harassment constitute bullying? Journal of Adolescent Health, 41(6), S51–S58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yardi, S. (2008). Whispers in the classroom. In T. McPherson (Ed.), Digital youth, innovation and the unexpected. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ybarra, M., Diener-West, M., & Leaf, P. (2007). Examining the overlap in internet harassment and school bullying: Implications for school intervention. Journal of Adolescent Health, 41, S42–S50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zickhur, K., (2011). Generations and Gadgets. Pew Research Center.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Arts, University of Brighton, East Sussex, BN2 0JY, UK

    Georgina Voss

Authors
  1. Georgina Voss
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Georgina Voss.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Voss, G. Gaming, Texting, Learning? Teaching Engineering Ethics Through Students’ Lived Experiences With Technology. Sci Eng Ethics 19, 1375–1393 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9368-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9368-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation