Abstract
For centuries, religion and philosophy have been the primary basis for efforts to guide humans to be more ethical. However, training in ethics and religion and imparting positive values and morality tests such as those emanating from the categorical imperative and the Golden Rule have not been enough to protect humankind from its bad behaviors. To improve ethics education educators must better understand aspects of human nature such as those that lead to “self-deception” and “personal bias.” Through rationalizations, faulty reasoning and hidden bias, individuals trick themselves into believing there is little wrong with their own unethical behavior. The application of science to human nature offers the possibility of improving ethics education through better self-knowledge. The author recommends a new paradigm for ethics education in contemporary modern society. This includes the creation of a new field called “applied evolutionary neuro-ethics” which integrates science and social sciences to improve ethics education. The paradigm can merge traditional thinking about ethics from religious and philosophical perspectives with new ideas from applied evolutionary neuro-ethics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Anand, V., Ashforth, B. E., & Joshi, M. (2004). Business as usual: The acceptance and perpetuation of corruption in organizations. Academy of Management Executive, 18(2), 39–55.
Baldwin, J. (1964). Blues for Mr. Charlie. New York: Dial Press.
Banaji, M. R., Bazerman, M. H., & Chugyh, D. (2003). How (un)ethical are you? Harvard Business Review, 81(12), 56–64.
Barkow, J. H., Cosmides, L., & Tooby, J. (1992). The adapted mind: Evolutionary psychology and the generation of culture. New York: Oxford University Press.
Callahan, D. (2004). The cheating culture: Why more Americans are doing wrong to get ahead. Orlando: Harcourt.
Conroy, S. J., & Emerson, T. L. N. (2004). Business ethics and religion: Religiosity as a predictor of ethical awareness among students. Journal of Business Ethics, 50, 383–396.
Dawkins, R. (1989). The selfish gene. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Everett, J. (2007). Ethics education and the role of the symbolic market. Journal of Business Ethics, 76, 253–267.
Gallese, V., & Goldman, A. (1998). Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mind-reading. Trends in Cognitive Science, 2(12), 493–501.
Gallese, V., Keysers, C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2004). A unifying view of the basis of social cognition. Trends in Cognitive Science, 8(9), 396–403.
Gilbert, D. (2006, April 16). I’m o.k., you’re biased. New York Times, Sec. 4, p. 12.
Gilovich, T. (1991). How we know what isn’t so: The fallibility of human reason in everyday life. New York: Free Press.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293, 2105–2108.
Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44, 389–400.
Haidt, J. (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Journal of Applied Psychology, 108, 814–834.
Kasser, T. (2002). The high price of materialism. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Milgram, S. (1963). Behavioral study of obedience. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 371–378.
Myers, D. G. (2002). Intuition: Its powers and perils. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Rizzolatti, G. (2005). The mirror neuron system and its function in humans. Anatomy and Embryology, 210(5–6), 419–421.
Rizzolatti, G., Fogassi, L., & Gallese, V. (2005). Mirrors in the mind. Scientific American, 295(5), 54–61.
Rodgers, W., & Gago, S. (2006). Biblical scriptures underlying six ethical models influencing organizational practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 64, 125–136.
Smith, D. L. (2004). Why we lie: The evolutionary roots of deception and the unconscious mind. New York: St. Martin’s.
Sternberg, R. (2011). Ethics from thought to action. Educational Leadership, 68, 34–39.
von Hippel, W., & Trivers, R. (2011). The evolution and psychology of self-deception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 34, 1–56.
Wilson, E. O. (1998). Consilience: The unity of knowledge. New York: Vintage Books.
Zarembo, A. (2004, July 15). A theater of inquiry and evil. Los Angeles Times, p. A1.
Zimbardo, P. (2007). The Lucifer effect: Understanding how good people turn evil. New York: Random House.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lampe, M. Science, Human Nature, and a New Paradigm for Ethics Education. Sci Eng Ethics 18, 543–549 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9373-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9373-8