Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Deliberate Microbial Infection Research Reveals Limitations to Current Safety Protections of Healthy Human Subjects

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Here we identify approximately 40,000 healthy human volunteers who were intentionally exposed to infectious pathogens in clinical research studies dating from late World War II to the early 2000s. Microbial challenge experiments continue today under contemporary human subject research requirements. In fact, we estimated 4,000 additional volunteers who were experimentally infected between 2010 and the present day. We examine the risks and benefits of these experiments and present areas for improvement in protections of participants with respect to safety. These are the absence of maximum limits to risk and the potential for institutional review boards to include questionable benefits to subjects and society when weighing the risks and benefits of research protocols. The lack of a duty of medical care by physician–investigators to research subjects is likewise of concern. The transparency of microbial challenge experiments and the safety concerns raised in this work may stimulate further dialogue on the risks to participants of human experimentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. US Select Agents are defined in Title 7 Code of Federal Regulations part 331 (7CFR331), 9CFR121, and 42CFR73; the ‘Select Agent and toxins regulations’.

  2. The ‘HHS regulations’ are administered under the HHS Assistant Secretary for Health by the Office for Human Research Protections (OHRP) under 45CFR46, part A of which constitutes the US federal Common Rule. The FDA is an agency division of the HHS and ‘FDA regulations’ refers to the clinical research regulations codified in 21CFR50, 21CFR56, 21CFR312 and 21CFR812. The CDC, NIH and FDA are divisions of the PHS but OHRP is not.

References

  • Abbott, L., & Grady, C. (2011). A systematic review of the empirical literature evaluating IRBs: What we know and what we still need to learn. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics, 6, 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Academy of Medical Sciences. (2005). Microbial challenge studies of human volunteers. http://www.acmedsci.ac.uk/viewFile/publicationDownloads/1127728424.pdf. Accessed 16 March 2014.

  • Annas, G. J. (1991). Mengele’s birthmark: The Nuremberg Code in United States courts. Journal of Contemporary Health Law and Policy, 7(1), 7–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beecher, H. K. (1959). Experimentation in man. Journal of the American Medical Association, 169, 461–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benson, W. W., Brock, D. W., & Mather, J. (1963). Serologic analysis of a penitentiary group using raw milk from a Q fever infected herd. Public Health Reports, 78, 707–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Black, R. E., Levine, M. M., Clements, M. L., Hughes, T. P., & Blaser, M. J. (1988). Experimental Campylobacter jejuni infection in humans. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 157, 472–479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bramstedt, K. A., & Kassimatis, K. (2004). A study of warning letters issued to institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Clinical and Investigative Medicine, 27(6), 316–323.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carrat, F., Vergu, E., Ferguson, N. M., Lemaitre, M., Cauchemez, S., Leach, S., et al. (2008). Time lines of infection and disease in human influenza: a review of volunteer challenge studies. American Journal of Epidemiology, 167, 775–785.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2014). Key facts about seasonal flu vaccine. http://www.cdc.gov/flu/protect/keyfacts.htm. Accessed 27 June 2014.

  • Chaves-Carballo, E. (2013). Clara Maass, yellow fever and human experimentation. Military Medicine, 178(5), 557–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences. (2002). International ethical guidelines for biomedical research involving human subjects. http://www.cioms.ch/publications/guidelines/guidelines_nov_2002_blurb.htm. Accessed 27 June 2014.

  • Council of Europe. (2005). Additional Protocol to the Convention on Human Rights and Biomedicine, concerning biomedical research. http://conventions.coe.int/Treaty/en/Treaties/Html/195.htm. Accessed 27 June 2014.

  • Council of Europe Steering Committee on Bioethics. (2012). Guide for research ethics committee members. http://www.coe.int/t/dg3/healthbioethic/activities/02_biomedical_research_en/guide/Guide_EN.pdf. Accessed 10 June 2014.

  • Edwards, S. J. L., Kirchin, S., & Huxtable, R. (2004). Research ethics committees and paternalism. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 88–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E., Wendler, D., & Grady, C. (2000). What makes clinical research ethical? Journal of the American Medical Association, 283(20), 2701–2711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein, J. E. (2013). Taking a bite out of malaria: Controlled human malaria infection by needle and syringe. American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 88, 3–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Food and Drug Administration. (2010). Payment to research subjects information sheet, guidance for institutional review boards and clinical investigators. http://www.fda.gov/regulatoryinformation/guidances/ucm126429.htm. Accessed 16 March 2014.

  • Frieden, T. R., & Collins, F. J. (2010). Intentional infection of vulnerable populations in 1946–1948: another tragic history lesson. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(18), 2063–2064.

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. & Friedman, R. D. (1990) Free to choose: A personal statement. Harcourt Inc.

  • Gogtay, N. J., Doshi, B. M., Kannan, S., & Thatte, U. (2011). A study of warning letters issued to clinical investigators and institutional review boards by the United States Food and Drug Administration. Indian Journal of Medical Ethics, 8(4), 211–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldenberg, L. R., Owens, E. F, Jr, & Pickar, J. G. (2007). Recruitment of research volunteers: methods, interest, and incentives. Journal of Chiropractic Education, 21(1), 28–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henle, W., & Henle, G. (1946). Experimental exposure of human subjects to viruses of influenza. Journal of Immunology, 52, 145–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hobbs, M. M., Sparling, P. F., Cohen, M. S., Shafer, W. M., Deal, C. D., & Jerse, A. E. (2011) Experimental gonococcal infection in male volunteers: Cumulative experience with neisseria gonorrhoeae strains FA1090 and MS11mkC. Frontiers in Microbiology, 2. doi:10.3389/fmicb.2011.00123.

  • International Conference on Harmonization of technical requirements for registration of pharmaceuticals for human use. (1996). Guideline for good clinical practice E6(R1). http://www.ich.org/fileadmin/Public_Web_Site/ICH_Products/Guidelines/Efficacy/E6_R1/Step4/E6_R1__Guideline.pdf. Accessed 27 June 2014.

  • Janowicz, D. M., Ofner, S., Katz, B. P., & Spinola, S. M. (2009). Experimental infection of human volunteers with Haemophilus ducreyi: Fifteen years of clinical data and experience. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 199, 1671–1679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson, R. L. (2003). Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: Informed consent and researcher malpractice actions. Washington Law Review, 78, 229–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joffe, S., & Miller, F. G. (2008). Bench to bedside: mapping the moral terrain of clinical research. Hastings Center Report, 38(2), 30–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalil, J. A., Halperin, S. A., & Langley, J. M. (2012). Human challenge studies: A review of adequacy of reporting methods and results. Future Microbiology, 7, 481–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. E., Coster, T. S., Wolf, M. K., Trespalacios, F. C., Cohen, D., Robins, G., et al. (2004). Two studies evaluating the safety and immunogenicity of a live, attenuated Shigella flexneri 2a vaccine (SC602) and excretion of vaccine organisms in North American volunteers. Infection and Immunity, 72(2), 923–930.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, B. D., Lyon, C. E., Porter, C. K., Maue, A. C., Guerry, P., Pierce, K. K., et al. (2013). Lack of homologous protection against Campylobacter jejuni CG8421 in a human challenge model. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 57, 1106–1113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight, V. (1964). The use of volunteers in medical virology. Progress in Medical Virology, 6, 1–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kotloff, K. L. (2003). Human challenge studies with infectious agents. Journal of Investigative Medicine, 51(supp. 1), S6–S11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, S. (1986). The Willowbrook hepatitis studies revisited: ethical aspects. Reviews of Infectious Diseases, 8, 157–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lemmons, T., & Elliott, C. (2001). Justice for the professional guinea pig. American Journal of Bioethics, 1(2), 51–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine, M. M., Tacket, C. O., & Sztein, M. B. (2001). Host-Salmonella interaction: Human trials. Microbes and Infection, 3, 1271–1279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lie, R. K., Emanuel, E., Grady, C., & Wendler, D. (2004). The standard of care debate: The Declaration of Helsinki versus the international consensus opinion. Journal of Medical Ethics, 30, 190–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • London, A. J. (2006). Reasonable risks in clinical research: a critique and a proposal for the Integrative Approach. Statistics in Medicine, 25(17), 2869–2885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, H. F. (2012). The rights and wrongs of intentional exposure research: Contextualizing the Guatemala STD inoculation study. Journal of Medical Ethics, 38, 513–515.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacCallum, F. O. (1946). Homologous serum hepatitis. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine, 39, 655–657.

    Google Scholar 

  • Macklin, R. (1989). The paradoxical case of payment as benefit to research subjects. IRB, 11(6), 1–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mastroianni, A. C., & Kahn, J. P. (2002). Risk and responsibility: Ethics, Grimes v Kennedy Krieger, and public health research involving children. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 1073–1076.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. G., & Grady, C. (2001). The ethical challenge of infection-inducing challenge experiments. Clinical Infectious Diseases, 33, 1028–1033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, F. G., & Joffe, S. (2009). Limits to research risks. Journal of Medical Ethics, 35(7), 445–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Office for Human Subjects Research Protection. (1993). Institutional review board guidebook. http://www.hhs.gov/ohrp/archive/irb/irb_guidebook.htm. Accessed 26 March 2014.

  • Oxford, J. S. (2013). Towards a universal influenza vaccine: volunteer virus challenge studies in quarantine to speed the development and subsequent licensing. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 76, 210–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oxford, J. S., Gelder, C., & Lambkin, R. (2005). Would you volunteer to be quarantined and infected with influenza virus? Expert Review of Anti-Infective Therapy, 3(1), 1–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pittman, P. R., Norris, S. L., Coonan, K. M., & McKee, K. T, Jr. (2005). An assessment of health status among medical research volunteers who served in the Project Whitecoat program at Fort Detrick, Maryland. Military Medicine, 170, 183–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollard, A. J., Savulescu, J., Oxford, J., Hill, A. V., Levine, M. M., Lewis, D. J., et al. (2012). Human microbial challenge: The ultimate animal model. The Lancet Infectious Diseases, 12, 903–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, C. K., Riddle, M. S., Tribble, D. R., Louis Bougeois, A., McKenzie, R., Isidean, S. D., et al. (2011). A systematic review of experimental infections with enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC). Vaccine, 29, 5869–5885.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Presidential Commission for the Study of Bioethical Issues. (2011). “Ethically impossible” STD research in Guatemala from 1946 to 1948. http://bioethics.gov/sites/default/files/Ethically-Impossible_PCSBI.pdf. Accessed 26 March 2014.

  • Preston Church, L. W., Le, T. P., Bryan, J. P., Gordon, D. M., Edelman, R., Fries, L., et al. (1997). Clinical manifestations of Plasmodium falciparum malaria experimentally induced by mosquito challenge. Journal of Infectious Diseases, 175, 915–920.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reed, W. (1902). Recent Researches Concerning the Etiology, Propagation, and Prevention of Yellow Fever, by the United States Army Commission. Journal of Hygiene (London), 2, 101–119.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Resnik, D. B. (2012). Limits on risks for healthy volunteers in biomedical research. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics, 33(2), 137–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson, H. S., & Belsky, L. (2004). The ancillary-care responsibilities of medical researchers: an ethical framework for thinking about the clinical care that researchers owe their subjects. Hastings Center Report, 34(1), 25–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rid, A., Emanuel, E. J., & Wendler, D. (2010). Evaluating the risks of clinical research. Journal of the American Medical Association, 304(13), 1472–1479.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roxburgh, H. L. (1963). Experiments on human subjects. Medicine Science and the Law, 3, 132–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, D. (2014). The right to participate in high-risk research. Lancet, 383(9921), 1009–1011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuster, E. (1997). Fifty years later: The significance of the Nuremberg Code. New England Journal of Medicine, 337(20), 1436–1440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, S. J. (2013). Dengue human infection model: Re-establishing a tool for understanding dengue immunology and advancing vaccine development. Human Vaccines and Immunobeneficials, 9, 1587–1590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyrrell, D. A. (1992). A view from the Common Cold Unit. Antiviral Research, 18, 105–125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United Nations. (1948). The universal declaration of human rights. http://www.un.org/en/documents/udhr/. Accessed 27 June 2014.

  • von Hayek, F. A. (2007) In B. Caldwell (Ed.), The road to serfdom. London: University of Chicago Press.

  • Weijer, C. (2000). Ethical analysis of risk. Journal of Law Medicine and Ethics, 28, 344–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weijer, C., & Miller, P. B. (2004). When are research risks reasonable in relation to anticipated benefits? Nature Medicine, 10(6), 570–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wendler, D., & Miller, F. G. (2007). Assessing research risks systematically: The net risks test. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33, 481–486.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Medical Association. (2013). World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki: Ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects. Journal of the American Medical Association, 310(20), 2191–2194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zarin, D. A., Tse, T., & Menikoff, J. (2014). Federal human research oversight of clinical trials in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association, 311(9), 960–961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors are employees of the US government.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David L. Evers.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Evers, D.L., Fowler, C.B., Mason, J.T. et al. Deliberate Microbial Infection Research Reveals Limitations to Current Safety Protections of Healthy Human Subjects. Sci Eng Ethics 21, 1049–1064 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9579-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-014-9579-z

Keywords

Navigation