Skip to main content
Log in

Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This research explored how engineering student views of their responsibility toward helping individuals and society through their profession, so-called social responsibility, change over time. A survey instrument was administered to students initially primarily in their first year, senior year, or graduate studies majoring in mechanical, civil, or environmental engineering at five institutions in September 2012, April 2013, and March 2014. The majority of the students (57 %) did not change significantly in their social responsibility attitudes, but 23 % decreased and 20 % increased. The students who increased, decreased, or remained the same in their social responsibility attitudes over time did not differ significantly in terms of gender, academic rank, or major. Some differences were found between institutions. Students who decreased in social responsibility initially possessed more positive social responsibility attitudes, were less likely to indicate that college courses impacted their views of social responsibility, and were more likely to have decreased in the frequency that they participated in volunteer activities, compared to students who did not change or increased their social responsibility. Although the large percentage of engineering students who decreased their social responsibility during college was disappointing, it is encouraging that courses and participation in volunteer activities may combat this trend.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • AAEE, American Academy of Environmental Engineers. (2009). Environmental engineering body of knowledge. Annapolis, MD: AAEE.

    Google Scholar 

  • ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2013). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs. Baltimore, MD: ABET. http://www.abet.org/eac-criteria-2014-2015/. Accessed July 23, 2014.

  • Argandona, A. (2006). From ethical responsibility to corporate social responsibility. 6th International symposium on catholic social thought and management education (p. 24). Rome, Italy: Pontifical University of St. Thomas (Angelicum), October 5–7. https://www.stthomas.edu/media/catholicstudies/center/johnaryaninstitute/conferences/2006-rome/ArgondonaFinalPape.pdf. Accessed March 30, 2015.

  • ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers. (2006). Code of ethics. Reston, VA: ASCE. http://www.asce.org/code_of_ethics/. Accessed March 30, 2015.

  • ASCE, American Society of Civil Engineers. (2008). Civil engineering body of knowledge for the 21st century. Preparing the civil engineer for the future (2nd ed.). Reston, WA: ASCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASEE, American Society for Engineering Education. (2012). American society for engineering education code of ethics. http://www.asee.org/member-resources/resources/Code_of_Ethics.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2014.

  • ASME, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2011). Vision 2030: Creating the future of mechanical engineering education (p. 96). New York: ASME.

    Google Scholar 

  • ASME, American Society of Mechanical Engineers. (2012). Code of ethics of engineers. P-15.7. February 1, 2012. https://www.asme.org/getmedia/9EB36017-FA98-477E−8A73-77B04B36D410/P157_Ethics.aspx. Accessed March 30, 2015.

  • Baum, R. J. (1994). Engineers and the public: Sharing responsibilities. In D. E. Wueste (Ed.), Professional ethics and social responsibility (pp. 121–138). Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canney, N. E. (2013). Assessing engineering students’ understanding of personal and professional social responsibility. Ph.D. Dissertation, Boulder: University of Colorado.

  • Canney, N., & Bielefeldt, A. (2015a). A framework for the development of social responsibility in engineers. International Journal of Engineering Education, 31(1B), 414–424.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canney, N. E., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2015b). Differences in engineering students’ views of social responsibility between disciplines. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice,. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)EI.1943-5541.0000248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Canney, N., & Bielefeldt, A. (2015c). Development of the Engineering professional responsibility assessment tool to measure social responsibility in students. Journal of Engineering Education, under review.

  • Canney, N., & Bielefeldt, A. (2015d). Gender differences in the social responsibility attitudes of engineering students and how these beliefs change over time. Journal of Women and Minorities in Science and Engineering, in press.

  • Cech, E. A. (2014). Culture of disengagement in engineering education? Science, Technology and Human Values, 39(1), 42–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conlon, E., & Zandvoort, H. (2011). Broadening ethics teaching in engineering: Beyond the individualistic approach. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17, 217–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Delve, C. L., Mintz, S. D., & Stewart, G. M. (1990). Promoting values development through community service: A design. New Directions for Student Services, 1990(50), 7–29.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devon, R., & van de Poel, I. (2004). Design ethics: The social ethics paradigm. International Journal of Engineering Education, 20(3), 461–469.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doorn, N., & Kroesen, J. O. (2013). Using and developing role plays in teaching aimed at preparing for social responsibility. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1513–1527.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagan, K., Lozano, J. B., Hurtado, S., & Case, M. H. (2013). The American freshman: National norms fall 2013. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles, Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elmore, B. B. (2014). Integrating community engagement, freshman chemical engineering, and an AIChE student chapter. Proceedings of the 2014 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition (p. 12). Indianapolis IN, June 15–18, Paper ID #9871.

  • ECUK, Engineering Council UK. (2008). UK Standard for professional engineering competence (UK-SPEC). December 2008. www.engc.org.uk/ukspec/.

  • Evans, M. D. & Evans, D. M. (2003). Community service projects for ASCE student chapters. Proceedings of the 2003 American society for engineering education annual conference and exposition (p. 13). Nashville TN, June 22–25, session 3215.

  • Evers, K. (2001). Standards for ethics and responsibility in science: An analysis and evaluation of their content, background and function. Paris, France: International Council for Science (ICSU).

  • Frederiksen, C. S., & Nielsen, M. E. J. (2013). The ethical foundations for CSR. In J. O. Okpara & S. O. Idowu (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility. CSR, Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garriga, E., & Mele, D. (2004). Corporate social responsibility theories: Mapping the territory. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 51–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris Interactive. (2004). American perspectives on engineers and engineering. Conducted for the American association of engineering societies. Reston, VA: AAES. February 13, 2004.

  • Herkert, J. (2002). Continuing and emerging issues in engineering ethics education. The Bridge, 32(3), 8–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. W. (n.d.) Integrating applied ethics and social responsibility: Ethical complexity or ethical chaos? (p. 8). http://www.ethicaledge.com/integration_social_responsibility.htm. Accessed July 23, 2014.

  • Litchfield, K., & Javernick-Will, A. (2014). Investigating gains from EWB-USA involvement. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice, 140(1), 04013008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NAE, National Academy of Engineering. (2004). The engineer of 2020: Visions of engineering in the new century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Academy of Engineering. (2008). Changing the conversation: Messages for improving public understanding of engineering. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • NSPE, National Society of Professional Engineers. (2007). NSPE code of ethics for engineers. Alexandria, VA: NSPE. http://www.nspe.org/resources/ethics/code-ethics. Accessed March 30, 2015.

  • Ozaktas, H. M. (2013). Teaching science, technology, and society to engineering students: A sixteen year journey. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19, 1439–1450.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pryor, J. H., Hurtado, S., DeAngelo, L., Sharkness, J., Romero, L. C., Korn, W. S., & Tran, S. (2008). The American freshman: National norms fall 2008. Los Angeles: Higher Education Research Institute, University of California Los Angeles.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsey, J. (1989). A curricular framework for community-bases STS issue instruction. Education and Urban Society, 22(1), 40–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rulifson, G., & Bielefeldt, A. R. (2015). Engineering students’ varied and changing views of social responsibility. Proceedings of the 122nd American society for engineering education (ASEE) annual conference and exposition (p. 16). Seattle WA, June 14–17, Paper ID #13591.

  • Sax, L. J., Astin, A. W., Lindholm, J. A., Korn, W. S., Saenz, V. B., & Mahoney, K. M. (2003). The American freshman: National norms for fall 2003. Los Angeles: University of California Los Angeles, Higher Education Research Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. (1977). Normative influences on altruism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 10, 221–279.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, B. H. (2011). Ethical relationships between science and society: Understanding the social responsibility of scientists. Ph.D. Dissertation, The University of Waikato.

  • Trbusic, H. (2014). Engineering in the community: Critical consciousness and engineering education. Interdisciplinary Description of Complex Systems, 12(2), 108–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tucker, J. & Ferguson, D. (2007). Incorporating ethics and social responsibility in undergraduate engineering education. International conference on engineering education ICEE, Coimbra, Portugal, September 3–7. http://icee2007.dei.uc.pt/proceedings/papers/125.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2014.

  • van Hattum-Janssen, N., Sanchez Fernandez, M. D., Caires, S., & Kahn, S. (2012). Social responsibility in engineering curricula. SEFI 40th annual conference (p. 6). Thessaloniki, Greece, September 23–26.

  • Zandvoort, H. (2007). Necessary knowledge for social responsibility of scientists and engineers. International conference on engineering education ICEE, Coimbra, Portugal, September 3–7. http://www.ineer.org/events/icee2007/papers/154.pdf. Accessed July 23, 2014.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1158863. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angela R. Bielefeldt.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bielefeldt, A.R., Canney, N.E. Changes in the Social Responsibility Attitudes of Engineering Students Over Time. Sci Eng Ethics 22, 1535–1551 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9706-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9706-5

Keywords

Navigation