Abstract
This paper reports the findings of a comparative study in which students’ perceived attainment of the objectives of an engineering ethics education and their attitude towards engineering ethics were investigated and compared. The investigation was carried out in Japan and Malaysia, involving 163 and 108 engineering undergraduates respectively. The research method used was based on a survey in which respondents were sent a questionnaire to elicit relevant data. Both descriptive and inferential statistical analyses were performed on the data. The results of the analyses showed that the attainment of the objectives of engineering ethics education and students’ attitude towards socio-ethical issues in engineering were significantly higher and positive among Japanese engineering students compared to Malaysian engineering students. Such findings suggest that a well-structured, integrated, and innovative pedagogy for teaching ethics will have an impact on the students’ attainment of ethics education objectives and their attitude towards engineering ethics. As such, the research findings serve as a cornerstone to which the current practice of teaching and learning of engineering ethics education can be examined more critically, such that further improvements can be made to the existing curriculum that can help produce engineers that have strong moral and ethical characters.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antes, A. L., Murphy, S. T., Waples, E. P., Mumford, M. D., Brown, R. P., Connelly, S., & Devenport, L. D. (2009). A meta-analysis of ethics instruction effectiveness in the sciences. Ethics and Behavior, 19(5), 379–402.
Balakrishnan, B., Er, P. H., & Visvanathan, P. (2013). Socio-ethical education in nanotechnology engineering programmes: A case study in Malaysia. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(3), 1341–1355.
Basart, J. M. (2015). Teaching engineering ethics in the classroom: Issues and challenges. In Contemporary ethical issues in engineering (pp. 144–158). Hersey: IGI Global.
Berne, R. W., & Schummer, J. (2005). Teaching societal and ethical implications of nanotechnology to engineering students through science fiction. Bulletin of Science, Technology & Society, 25(6), 459–468.
Clark, S. (2000). Engineering ethics in Japanese corporations: A view from the field. Engineering Academy of Japan Information, 97, 17–31.
Colby, A., & Sullivan, W. M. (2008). Ethics teaching in undergraduate engineering education. Journal of Engineering Education, 97(3), 327.
Creswell, J. W. (2013). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. Beverley Hills: Sage Publications.
Delany, C., Kosta, L., Ewen, S., Nicholson, P., Remedios, L., & Harms, L. (2016). Identifying pedagogy and teaching strategies for achieving nationally prescribed learning outcomes. Higher Education Research & Development, 35(5), 895–909.
Harris, C. E., Pritchard, M. S., Rabins, M. J., James, R., & Englehardt, E. (2013). Engineering ethics: Concepts and cases. Boston: Cengage Learning.
Hayden, N. J., Rizzo, D. M., Dewoolkar, M. M., Oka, L., & Neumann, M. (2010). Incorporating systems thinking and sustainability within civil and environmental engineering curricula at UVM. In American Society for Engineering Education (ASEE) St. Lawrence section meeting. Rochester, NY: Rochester Institute of Technology.
Hoover, E., Brown, P., Averick, M., Kane, A., & Hurt, R. (2009). Teaching small and thinking large: Effects of including social and ethical implications in an interdisciplinary nanotechnology course. Journal of Nano Education, 1(1), 86–95.
Iino, H. (2005). Introductory and engineering ethics education for engineering students in Japan. International Journal of Engineering Education, 21(3), 378–383.
King, I. M. (1981). A theory for nursing systems, concepts, process. https://philpapers.org/rec/KINATF. Accessed 1 May 2017.
Lathem, S. A., Neumann, M. D., & Hayden, N. (2011). The socially responsible engineer: Assessing student attitudes of roles and responsibilities. Journal of Engineering Education, 100(3), 444–474.
Lynch, W. T., & Kline, R. (2000). Engineering practice and engineering ethics. Science, Technology and Human Values, 25(2), 195–225.
Newberry, B. (2004). The dilemma of ethics in engineering education. Science and Engineering Ethics, 10(2), 343–351.
Pine, A. (2012). Grave new world. ASEE Prism, 22(3), 35.
Simonson, M. R., & Maushak, N. (1996). Instructional technology and attitude change. http://nsuworks.nova.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1011&context=fse_facbooks. Accessed 28 April 2017.
Tochinai, F., & Kanemitsu, H. (2016). Engineering Education at Kanazawa Institute of Technology: To foster engineers who can make ethically and professionally appropriate decisions. In 2016 Regional conference in engineering education.
Troesch, V. (2015). What is it to be an ethical engineer? A phenomenological approach to engineering ethics pedagogy. Dissertation, Michigan Technological University.
Zandvoort, H. (2008). Preparing engineers for social responsibility. European Journal of Engineering Education, 33(2), 133–140.
Zandvoort, H., Børsen, T., Deneke, M., & Bird, S. J. (2013). Editors’ overview perspectives on teaching social responsibility to students in science and engineering. Science and Engineering Ethics, 19(4), 1413–1438.
Zhou, C., Otrel-Cass, K., & Børsen, T. (2015). Integrating ethics into engineering education. In Contemporary ethical issues in engineering (pp. 159–173). Hersey: IGI Global.
Zimbardo, P. G., & Leippe, M. R. (1991). The psychology of attitude change and social influence. New York: Mcgraw-Hill Book Company.
Acknowledgements
This study is funded by Sumitomo Foundation, Japan through Japan related Research Project Fiscal Year 2015 (Code: 158451).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Balakrishnan, B., Tochinai, F. & Kanemitsu, H. Engineering Ethics Education: A Comparative Study of Japan and Malaysia. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 1069–1083 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0051-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0051-3