Skip to main content
Log in

Perceptions of Work-Related Stress and Ethical Misconduct Amongst Non-tenured Researchers in Italy

  • Original Research/Scholarship
  • Published:
Science and Engineering Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The relationship between stress and unethical behaviour amongst non-tenured research staff in academia is a relatively unexplored phenomenon. The research reported herein was therefore carried out with the aim of exploring the relationship(s) between stress, the socio-organisational factors which contribute to it, job satisfaction, perceptions of job instability, and the occurrence of unethical behaviour in research. 793 Italian researchers participated in the research—all of whom were working on fixed-term contracts—after being individually requested to complete an online questionnaire. The data indicate that unethical behaviours occur with alarming frequency. The stress level reported is quite high, as is the level of perceived job insecurity, both of which impact upon levels of job satisfaction. Perceived stress levels also seem to play a role in the commission of unethical behaviours, but this relationship is irrelevant when one considers the role of social and organisational factors that are known to induce it. Indeed, it seems that there are various socio-organisational determinants of stress that have an obvious direct negative influence on the commission of unethical behaviours more than the stress level per se. This research paints a worrying picture in relation to the psycho-physical state of non-tenured researchers as a result of the working conditions in which they find themselves in Italian universities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abildgaard, J. S., Nielsen, K., & Sverke, M. (2017). Can job insecurity be managed? Evaluating an organizational-level intervention addressing the negative effects of restructuring. Work & Stress,32(2), 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 267–299). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Agnew, R. (1992). Foundation for a general strain theory of crime and delinquency. Criminology,30, 47–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allvin, M., Mellner, C., Movitz, F., & Aronsson, G. (2013). The diffusion of flexibility: Estimating the incidence of low-regulated working conditions. Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies,3(3), 99–116.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ana, J., Koehlmoos, T., Smith, R., & Yan, L. L. (2013). Research misconduct in low and middle-income countries. PLoS Medicine,10(3), e1001315. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aquino, K., & Reed, A. (2002). The self-importance of moral identity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,83(6), 1423–1440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beaujean, A. A. (2014). Latent variable modeling using R: A step-by-step guide. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouter, L. M., Tijdink, J., Axelsen, N., Martinson, B. C., & ter Riet, G. (2016). Ranking major and minor research misbehaviors: Results from a survey among participants of four World Conferences on Research Integrity. Research Integrity and Peer Review. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41073-016-0024-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brookes, K., Limbert, C., Deacy, C., O’Reilly, A., Scott, S., & Thirlaway, K. (2013). Systematic review: Work-related stress and the HSE management standards. Occupational Medicine,63(7), 463–472.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carley-Baxter, L., Hill, C., Roe, D., Twiddy, S. E., Baxter, R., & Ruppenkamp, J. (2009). Does response rate matter? Journal editors use of survey quality measures in manuscript publication decisions. Survey Practice, 2(7). https://www.surveypractice.org/article/2948. Accessed January 25, 2019.

  • Chandler, J., Barry, J., & Clarke, H. (2002). Stressing academe: The wear and tear of new public management. Human Relations,55(9), 1051–1069.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior,24(4), 385–396.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, S., & Williamson, G. (1988). Perceived stress in a probability sample of the United States. In S. Spacapan & S. Oskamp (Eds.), The social psychology of health (pp. 31–68). Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coin, F. (2014). Turning contradictions into subjects: The cultural logic of university assessment. Knowledge Cultures,1(4), 145–173.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cousins, R., MacKay, C. J., Clarke, S. D., Kelly, C., Kelly, P. J., & McCaig, R. H. (2004). ‘Management standards’ and work related stress in the UK: Practical development. Work & Stress,18(2), 113–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Couzin-Frankel, J. (2013). Shaking up science. Science,339(6118), 386–389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalton, D., & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender differences in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the social desirability response bias. Journal of Business Ethics,103(1), 73–93. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-011-0843-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darabi, M., Macaskill, A., & Reidy, L. (2017). Stress among UK academics: Identifying who copes best. Journal of Further and Higher Education.,41(3), 393–412.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. S. (2003). The role of culture in research misconduct. Accountability in Research,10(3), 189–201.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. S., Riske-Morris, M., & Diaz, S. R. (2007). Causal factors implicated in research misconduct: Evidence from ORI case files. Science and Engineering Ethics,13(4), 395–414.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, T., Wiezer, N., De Weerd, M., Nielsen, K., Mattila-Holappa, P., & Mockałło, Z. (2016). The impact of restructuring on employee well-being: A systematic review of longitudinal studies. Work & Stress,30(1), 91–114.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witte, H., Pienaar, J., & De Cuyper, N. (2016). Review of 30 years of longitudinal studies on the association between job insecurity and health and well-being: Is there causal evidence? Australian Psychology,51, 18–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Witte, H., Vander Elst, T., & De Cuyper, N. (2015). Job insecurity, health and well-being. In J. Vuori, R. Blonk, & R. H. Price (Eds.), Sustainable working lives: Managing work transitions and health throughout the life course (pp. 109–128). New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, J. M., Anderson, E. E., Chibnall, J., Carroll, K., Gibb, T., Ogbuka, C., et al. (2013). Understanding research misconduct: A comparative analysis of 120 cases of professional wrongdoing. Accountability in Research,20(5–6), 320–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, J. M., Chibnall, J. T., Tait, R., & Vander Wal, J. S. (2018). The professionalism and integrity in research program: Description and preliminary outcomes. Academic Medicine,93(4), 586–592.

    Google Scholar 

  • DuBois, J. M., Kraus, E., & Vasher, M. (2012). The development of a taxonomy of wrongdoing in medical practice and research. American Journal of Preventive Medicine,42(1), 89–98.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eastwood, S., Derish, P., Leash, E., & Ordway, S. (1996). Ethical issues in biomedical research: Perceptions and practices of postdoctoral research fellows responding to a survey. Science and Engineering Ethics,2(1), 89–114. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02639320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards, J. A., Webster, S., van Laar, D., & Easton, S. (2008). Psychometric analysis of the UK Health and Safety Executive’s Management Standards work-related stress Indicator Tool. Work & Stress,22(2), 96–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli, D. (2009). How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data. PLoS ONE,4(5), e5738. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli, D. (2013). Why growing retractions are (mostly) a good sign. PLoS Medicine,10(12), e1001563. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001563.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli, D. (2015). We need more research on causes and consequences, as well as on solutions. Addiction,110(1), 11–13. https://doi.org/10.1111/add.12772.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fanelli, D., Costas, R., & Larivière, V. (2015). Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity. PLoS ONE,10(6), e0127556. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fang, F. C., Bennett, J. W., & Casadevall, A. (2013). Males are overrepresented among life science researchers committing scientific misconduct. mBio,4(1), e00640–12. https://doi.org/10.1128/mBio.00640-12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisher, S. (1994). Stress in academic life: The mental assembly line. Buckingham: Society for Research into Higher Education and Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, R. E., & Mc Vea, J. (2001). A stakeholder approach to strategic management. In M. A. Hitt, R. E. Freeman, & J. Harrison (Eds.), The Blackwell handbook of strategic management (pp. 189–207). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • French, J. R. P., Jr., Caplan, R. D., & Harrison, R. V. (1982). The mechanisms of job stress and strain. London: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gillespie, N. A., Walsh, M., Winefield, A. H., Dua, J., & Stough, C. (2001). Occupational stress in universities: Staff perception of the causes, consequences and moderators of stress. Work & Stress,15(1), 53–72.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidi, S., Bagnara, S., & Fichera, G. P. (2012). The HSE indicator tool, psychological distress and work ability. Occupational Medicine,62(3), 203–209.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hellgren, J., & Sverke, M. (2003). Does job insecurity lead to impaired well-being or vice versa? Estimation of cross-lagged effects using latent variable modelling. Journal of Organizational Behavior,24(2), 215–236. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jamshidian, M., Jalal, S., & Jansen, C. (2014). MissMech: An R package for testing homoscedasticity, multivariate normality, and missing completely at random (MCAR). Journal of Statistical Software,56(6), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, T., Ge, H., Sun, J., Li, R., Han, R., & Liu, J. (2017). Relationship between occupational stress, 5-HT2A receptor polymorphisms and mental health in petroleum workers in the Xinjiang arid desert: A cross-sectional study. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,14(4), 402. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14040402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalichman, M. W., & Friedman, P. J. (1992). A pilot study of biomedical trainees’ perceptions concerning research ethics. Academic Medicine,67(11), 769–775.

    Google Scholar 

  • Karasek, R. A., & Theorell, T. (1990). Healthy work: Stress, productivity and the reconstruction of working life. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, R., McHugh, M., & McCrory, M. (2009). HSE Management Standards and stress-related work outcomes. Occupational Medicine,59(8), 574–579.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinman, G. (1998). Pressure points: A survey into the causes and consequences of occupational stress in UK academic and related staff. London: AUT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinman, G. (2001). Pressure points: A review of stressors and strains in UK Academics. Educational Psychology,21(4), 474–492. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410120090849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinman, G. (2008). Work stressors, health and sense of cohesion in UK academic employees. Educational Psychology,28(7), 823–835.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinman, G., & Jones, F. (2004). Working to the limit. London: AUT Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kinman, G., & Wray, S. (2013). Higher stress. A survey of stress and well-being among staff in higher education. London: UCU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kish-Gephart, J. J., Harrison, D. A., & Treviño, L. K. (2010). Bad apples, bad cases, and bad barrels: Meta-analytic evidence about sources of unethical decisions at work. Journal of Applied Psychology,95(1), 1–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Klassen, R., & Chiu, M. M. (2010). Effects of teachers’ self-efficacy and job satisfaction: Teacher gender, years of experience, and job stress. Journal of Educational Psychology,102(3), 741–756.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Komić, D., Marušić, S. L., & Marušić, A. (2015). Research integrity and research ethics in professional codes of ethics: Survey of terminology used by professional organizations across research disciplines. PLoS ONE,10(7), 1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Langford, P. (2010). Benchmarking work practices and outcomes in Australian universities using an employee survey. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,32(1), 41–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (1966). Psychological stress and the coping process. New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, C. S., & Schrank, A. (2010). Incubating innovation or cultivating corruption? The developmental state and the life sciences in Asia. Social Forces,88, 1231–1255.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leventhal, G. S. (1976). The distribution of rewards and resources in groups and organizations. In L. Berkowitz & E. Walster (Eds.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 91–131). New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcatto, F., Colautti, L., Larese Filon, F., Luis, O., & Ferrante, D. (2014). The HSE management standards indicator tool: Concurrent and construct validity. Occupational Medicine,64(5), 365–371.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcatto, F., D’Errico, G., Di Blasi, L., & Ferrante, D. (2011). Assessing work-related stress: An Italian adaptation of the HSE management standards work-related stress indicator tool. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia,33(4), 403–408.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., Crain, A. L., & De Vries, R. (2006). Scientists’ perceptions of organizational justice and self-reported misbehaviors. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,1(1), 51–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, B. C., Anderson, M. S., & De Vries, R. G. (2005). Scientists behaving badly. Nature,435, 737–738.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, B. C., Crain, A. L., De Vries, R., & Anderson, M. S. (2010). The importance of organizational justice in ensuring research integrity. Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics,5(3), 67–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martinson, B. C., Thrush, C. R., & Crain, A. L. (2013). Development and validation of the survey of organizational research climate (SORC). Science and Engineering Ethics,19(3), 813–834. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-012-9410-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McClenahan, C. A., Giles, M. L., & Mallett, J. (2007). The importance of context specificity in work stress research: A test of the Demand-Control-Support model in academics. Work & Stress,21(1), 85–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, C., Detert, J. R., Treviño, L. K., Baker, V. L., & Mayer, D. M. (2012). Why employees do bad things: Moral disengagement and unethical organizational behavior. Personnel Psychology,65(1), 1–48.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mumford, M. D., Connelly, M. S., Helton, W. B., Strange, J. M., & Osburn, H. K. (2001). On the construct validity of integrity tests: Individual and situational factors as predictors of test performance. International Journal of Selection and Assessment,9(3), 240–257.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nulty, D. D. (2008). The adequacy of response rates to online and paper surveys: What can be done? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education,33(3), 301–314.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opstrup, N., & Pihl-Thingvad, S. (2016). Stressing academia? Stress-as-offence-to-self at Danish universities. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management,38(1), 39–52.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parlangeli, O., Palmitesta, P., Bracci, M., Caratozzolo, M. C., Liston, P.M., & Marchigiani, E. (2017). Stress and perceptions of unethical behaviours in Academia. IN Proceedings of ICERI 2017 conference, Siviglia, 16th18th novembre 2017. https://doi.org/10.21125/iceri.2017.

  • Pennock, R. T., & O’Rourke, M. (2017). Developing a scientific virtue-based approach to science ethics training. Science and Engineering Ethics,23(1), 243–262. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-016-9757-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • R Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. https://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 30 June 2018.

  • Redman, B. K., & Caplan, A. L. (2017). Improving research misconduct policies. EMBO Reports,18(12), 511–514. https://doi.org/10.15252/embr.201744110.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reisel, D. W., Probst, T. M., Chia, S.-L., Maloles, C. M., & Konig, C. J. (2010). The effects of job insecurity on job satisfaction, organizational citizenship behaviour, deviant behaviour, and negative emotions of employees. International Studies of Management & Organization,40(1), 74–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Revelle, W. (2017). psych: Procedures for Personality and Psychological Research, Northwestern University, Evanston: Illinois, USA. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=psych Version = 1.7.8. Accessed 30 June 2018.

  • Rondinone, B. M., Persechino, B., Castaldi, T., Valenti, A., Ferrante, P., Ronchetti, M., et al. (2012). Work-related stress risk assessment in Italy: The validation study of health safety and executive indicator tool. Giornale Italiano di Medicina del Lavoro ed Ergonomia,34(4), 392–399.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosseel, Y. (2012). lavaan: An R package for structural equation modeling. Journal of Statistical Software, 48, 1–36. http://www.jstatsoft.org/v48/i02/.

  • Schreiber, J. B., Nora, A., Stage, F. K., Barlow, E. A., & King, J. (2006). Reporting structural equation modeling and confirmatory factor analysis results: A review. Journal of Educational Research,99(6), 323–337.

    Google Scholar 

  • Selye, H. (1956). The stress of life. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.

    Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, J. P. (1973). Machiavellianism, MBA’s and managers: Leadership correlates and socialization effects. Academy of Management Journal,16(3), 404–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, R. (2000). An introduction to science and technology studies. Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sovacool, B. K. (2008). Exploring scientific misconduct: Isolated individuals, impure institutions, or an inevitable idiom of modern science? Journal of Bioethical Inquiry,5, 271–282.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steneck, N. H. (2006). Fostering integrity in research: Definitions, current knowledge, and future directions. Science and Engineering Ethics,12(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1007/PL00022268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sverke, M., & Hellgren, J. (2002). The nature of job insecurity: Understanding employment uncertainty on the brink of a new millennium. Applied Psychology: An international Review,51(1), 23–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taris, T. W., Schreurs, P. J. G., & Van Iersal-Van Silfhout, I. J. (2001). Job stress, job strain, and psychological withdrawal among Dutch university staff: Towards a dual-process model for the effects of occupational stress. Work and Stress,15(4), 283–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treviño, L. K. (1986). Ethical decision making in organizations: A person-situation interactionist model. Academy of Management Review,11(3), 601–611.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tytherleigh, M., Webb, C., Cooper, C., & Ricketts, C. (2005). Occupational stress in UK higher education institutions: A comparative study of all staff categories. Higher Education Research & Development,24(1), 41–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Emmerik, H., & Sanders, K. (2004). Social embeddedness and job performance of tenured and non-tenured professionals. Human Resource Management Journal,14(1), 40–54. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2004.tb00111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wartigg, S. L., Forshaw, M. J., South, J., & White, A. K. (2013). New, normative, English-sample data for the Short-Form Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-4). Journal of Health Psychology,18(12), 1617–1628.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts, J., & Robertson, N. (2011). Burnout in university teaching staff: A systematic literature review. Educational Research,53(1), 33–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winefield, A. H. (2000). Stress in academe: Some recent research findings. In D. T. Kenny, J. G. Carlson, F. J. McGuigan, & J. L. Sheppard (Eds.), Stress and health (pp. 437–446). Amsterdam: Harwood Academic Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winefield, A. H. (2003). Stress in university academics. In M. F. Dollard, A. H. Winefield, & W. R. Winefield (Eds.), Occupational stress in the service professions (pp. 233–255). London: Taylor & Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winter, R. P., & Sarros, J. C. (2002). The academic work environment in Australian universities: A motivating place to work? Higher Education Research and Development,21(3), 242–258.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stefano Guidi.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 131 kb)

Supplementary material 2 (DOCX 165 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parlangeli, O., Guidi, S., Marchigiani, E. et al. Perceptions of Work-Related Stress and Ethical Misconduct Amongst Non-tenured Researchers in Italy. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 159–181 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00091-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00091-6

Keywords

Navigation