Availability of Data and Materials
Data sharing not applicable to this article as no datasets were generated or analyzed during the current study.
Notes
It should be stressed, however, that there is no single widely accepted definition of geoethics. See detailed discussion on the concept of “geoethics” in Martínez-Frías et al. (2011), Ferrero et al. (2012), and Peppoloni and Di Capua (2012) and reference therein. The major research challenges of geoethics are defined by Max Wyss & Silvia Peppoloni (see the contribution by Wyss and Peppoloni 2015).
Gigantic growth in population.
A free digital version available online to the geoethical community.
References
Bobrowsky, P., Cronin, V. S., Di Capua, G., Kieffer, S. W., & Peppoloni, S. (2017). The emerging field of geoethics. In L. C. Gunderson (Ed.), Scientific integrity and ethics in the geosciences (pp. 175–212). Hoboken: Special Publication American Geophysical Union, Wiley.
Druguet, E., Passchier, C. W., Pennacchioni, G., & Carreras, J. (2013). Geoethical education: A critical issue for geoconservation. Episodes, 36(1), 11–18.
Ferrero, E., Giardino, M., Lozar, F., Giordano, E., Belluso, E., & Perotti, L. (2012). Geodiversity action plans for the enhancement of geoheritage in the Piemonte region (north-western Italy). Annals of Geophysics, 55, 487–495.
Martínez-Frías, J., González, J. L., & Rull-Pérez, F. (2011). Geoethics and deontology: From fundamentals to applications in planetary protection. Episodes, 34, 257–262.
Matteucci, R., Gosso, G., Peppoloni, S., Piacente, S., & Wasowski, J. (2014). The geoethical promise: A proposal. Episodes, 37(3), 190–191.
Nikitina, N. (2012). Geoethics: Theory, principles, problems. Moscow: LLC Geoinformmark.
Peppoloni, S., & Di Capua, G. (2012). Geoethics and geological culture: Awareness, responsibility and challenges. Analysis of Geophysics, 55(3), 335–341.
Peppoloni, S., & Di Capua, G. (Eds.). (2015). Geoethics: The role and responsibility of geoscientists. London: Geological Society of London, Special Publications.
Scolobig, A. (2015). Brief communication: The dark side of risk and crisis communication: Legal conflicts and responsibility allocation. Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences, 15(6), 1449–1456.
Stewart, I. S., & Lewis, D. (2017). Communicating contested geoscience to the public: Moving from ‘matters of fact’ to ‘matters of concern’. Earth-Science Reviews, 174, 122–133.
Wyss, M., & Peppoloni, S. (2015). Geoethics: Ethical challenges and case studies in earth sciences. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Renée Rust (Research fellow; School of Geography, Archaeology and Environmental Studies, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg) for her suggestions on writing and improving the English of the paper.
Funding
The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors wrote and approved the final version of the submitted manuscript. No seniority of authorship is implied by the order of names; this paper is the product of a true and entirely equal collaboration. The authors are responsible for all research and composition with regard to this article.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there are no conficts of interest to disclose. The views and interpretations in this publication are those of the authors and are not necessarily attributable to their organizations.
Availability of Supporting Data
Not applicable.
Consent for Publication
Not applicable.
Ethics Approval and Consent to Participate
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abioui, M., M’Barki, L., Benssaou, M. et al. Rogelio Daniel Acevedo and Jesús Martínez Frías (eds.): Geoethics in Latin America. Sci Eng Ethics 25, 1589–1595 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00126-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00126-y