Abstract
Ethical becoming represents a novel framework for teaching engineering ethics. This framework insists on the complementarity of pragmatism, care, and virtue. The dispositional nature of the self is a central concern, as are relational considerations. However, unlike previous conceptual work, this paper introduces additional lenses for exploring ethical relationality by focusing on indebtedness, harmony, potency, and reflective thought. This paper first reviews relevant contributions in the engineering ethics literature. Then, the relational process ontology of Alfred North Whitehead is described and identified as the foundation of the ethical becoming concept. Following this, ethical becoming is imagined as comprising five components: relationality and indebtedness, harmony and potency (i.e., beauty), care, freedom and reflective thought, and ethical inquiry. Each component will be unpacked and knit together to argue that (1) becoming in all its forms is relational and, therefore, whatever becomes is indebted to all to which it relates; (2) one’s ethical engagement must be directed toward the creation of harmony and potency; (3) care practices are necessary to ensure that multiplicity is valued and safeguarded in the meeting of needs; (4) the capacity for reflective thought is necessary to fashion one’s self and others in the direction of harmony, potency, and care; and (5) ethical thought and action must operate through a cycle of ethical inquiry. This paper will close with a brief exploration of how ethical becoming could be utilized in engineering education contexts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ash, S. L., & Clayton, P. H. (2009). Generating, deepening, and documenting learning: The power of critical reflection in applied learning. Journal of Applied Learning in Higher Education,1(1), 25–48.
Davis, M. (2006). Integrating ethics into technical courses: Micro-insertion. Science and Engineering Ethics,12(4), 717–730.
Deleuze, G. (1993). The fold: Leibniz and the Baroque. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Dewey, J. (1988). The Middle works of John Dewey, Volume 12, 1899–1924: Reconstruction in philosophy and essays 1920. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
Dewey, J. (1998). Experience and education. Indianapolis: Kappa Delta Pi.
Faubion, J. D. (2001). Toward an anthropology of ethics: Foucault and the pedagogies of autopoiesis. Representations,74(1), 83–104.
Fore, G. A. (2013). Leading while being led: Developing the developer at a Catholic NGO in Cape Town. Anthropology Southern Africa, 36(1&2), 80–90.
Foucault, M. (1997). Ethics, subjectivity and truth: The essential works of Michel Foucault 1954–1984 (R. Hurley, Trans., Vol. 1).
Harris, C. E. (2008). The good engineer: Giving virtue its due in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics,14(2), 153.
Hartshorne, C. (1970). Creative synthesis and philosophic method. La Salle, IL: Open Court.
Henning, B. G. (2005). The ethics of creativity: Beauty, morality, and nature in a processive cosmos. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press.
Henning, B. G. (2008). Is there an ethics of creativity? In T. Walker & M. Toth (Eds.), Whiteheadian ethics: Abstracts and papers from the ethics section of the philosophy group at the 6th international Whitehead conference at the University of Salzburg, July 2006. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Hess, J. L., & Fore, G. (2018). A systematic literature review of US engineering ethics interventions. Science and Engineering Ethics, 24(2), 551–583.
Hess, J. L., Strobel, J., & Pan, R. (2016). Voices from the workplace: Practitioners’ perspectives on the role of empathy and care within engineering. Engineering Studies, 8(3), 212–242.
Ingold, T. (2013). Making: Anthropology, archaeology, art and architecture. Abingdon: Routledge.
Latour, B. (2004). Politics of nature. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nair, I., & Bulleit, W. M. (2019). Pragmatism and care in engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0080-y.
Nyamnjoh, F. B. (2017). Drinking from the Cosmic Gourd: How Amos Tutuola can change our minds. Bamenda: Langaa RPCIG.
Pantazidou, M., & Nair, I. (1999). Ethic of care: Guiding principles for engineering teaching & practice. Journal of Engineering Education,88(2), 205.
Riley, D. (2013). Hidden in plain view: Feminists doing engineering ethics, engineers doing feminist ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics,19(1), 189–206.
Riley, D., & Lambrinidou, Y. (2015). Canons against cannons? Social justice and the engineering ethics imaginary. In ASEE conferences, 2015 (Vol. 26).
Schmidt, J. A. (2014). Changing the paradigm for engineering ethics. Science and Engineering Ethics,20(4), 985–1010.
Shaviro, S. (2012). Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Sherburne, D. W. (1966). A key to Whitehead’s process and reality. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Stenner, P. (2008). AN Whitehead and subjectivity. Subjectivity,22(1), 90–109.
Tronto, J. C. (1993). Moral boundaries: A political argument for an ethic of care. London: Psychology Press.
Wallack, F. B. (1980). The epochal nature of process in Whitehead’s metaphysics. Albany: SUNY Press.
Whitbeck, C. (2011). Ethics in engineering practice and research (2nd ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1934). Nature and life (Vol. 13). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1967). Adventures of ideas (Vol. 2). New York: Simon and Schuster.
Whitehead, A. N. (1968). Modes of thought. New York: The Free Press.
Whitehead, A. N. (1978). Process and reality. Corrected edition, ed. David Ray Griffin and Donald W. Sherburne, 47, 277. New York: Free Press.
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the National Science Foundation under Grant No. 1737157. Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fore, G.A., Hess, J.L. Operationalizing Ethical Becoming as a Theoretical Framework for Teaching Engineering Design Ethics. Sci Eng Ethics 26, 1353–1375 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00160-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00160-w