Abstract
Current theory about the evolution of social learning in a changing environment predicts the emergence of mixed strategies that rely on some selective combination of social and asocial learning. However, the results of a recent tournament of social learning strategies [Rendell et al. Science 328(5975):208–213, 2010] suggest that the success relies almost entirely on copying to learn behavior. Those authors conclude that mixed strategies are vulnerable to invasion by individuals using social learning strategies alone. Here we perform a competition using unselective strategies that differ only in the degree of social versus asocial learning. We show that, under the same conditions of the aforementioned tournament, a pure social learning strategy can be invaded by an unselectively mixed strategy and attain an equilibrium where the latter is majority. Although existing theory suggests that copying other individuals unselectively is not adaptive, we show that, at this equilibrium, the average individual fitness of the population is higher than for a population of pure asocial learners, overcoming Rogers’ paradox in finite populations.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Blackmore S (1999) The meme machine. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1985) Culture and the evolutionary process. University of Chicago Press, Chicago
Boyd R, Richerson PJ (1995) Why does culture increase human adaptability? Ethol Sociobiol 16:125–143
Castro L, Toro MA (2004) The evolution of culture: from primate social learning to human culture. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:10235–10240
Castro L, Castro-Nogueira L, Castro-Nogueira MA, Toro MA (2010) Cultural transmission and social control of human behavior. Biol Philos 25:347–360
Enquist M, Eriksson K, Ghirlanda S (2007) Critical social learning: a solution to Rogers’s paradox of nonadaptive culture. Am Anthropol 109(4):727–734
Feldman MW, Aoki K, Kumm J (1996) Individual versus social learning: evolutionary analysis in a fluctuating environment. Anthropol Sci 104:209–231
Franz M, Nunn CL (2009) Rapid evolution of social learning. J Evol Biol 22(9):1914–1922
Kameda T, Nakanishi D (2003) Does social/cultural learning increase human adaptability? Rogers’s question revisited. Evol Hum Behav 24:242–260
Laland KN (2004) Social learning strategies. Learn Behav 32:4–14
Rendell L, Fogarty L, Laland KN (2009) Rogers’ paradox recast and resolved: population structure and the evolution of social learning strategies. Evolution 64:534–548
Rendell L, Boyd R, Cownden D, Enquist M, Eriksson K, Feldman MW, Fogarty L, Ghirlanda S, Lillicrap T, Laland KN (2010) Why copy others? Insights from the social learning strategies tournament. Science 328(5975):208–213
Rogers AR (1988) Does biology constrain culture? Am Anthropol 90(4):819–831
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Castro, L., Toro, M.A. Imitation or innovation? Unselective mixed strategies can provide a better solution. Theory Biosci. 131, 273–279 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-012-0161-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12064-012-0161-4