Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Transmission expansion planning using composite teaching learning based optimisation algorithm

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Intelligence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the ever increasing demand and stressed operating conditions, resource expansion is the only way to have sustainable electric grid. Transmission system expansion is one of the important aspects in this regard. In the recent years, expansion problem has been addressed by several researchers. Meta-heuristic techniques have been applied to solve expansion problems. In this paper, a new variant of Teaching Learning Based Optimization (TLBO) Algorithm is proposed by adding a sine function based diversity in the teaching phase. The proposed variant is named as Composite TLBO (C-TLBO). The efficacy of the proposed variant has been evaluated on standard benchmark functions and then it is evaluated on two standard electrical networks with cases of inclusion of uncertainty and demand burst. The results obtained from optimization processes have been evaluated with the help of several analytical and statistical tests. Results affirm that the proposed modification enhances the performance of the algorithm in a substantial manner.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Irtija N, Sangoleye F, Tsiropoulou EE (2020) Contract-theoretic demand response management in smart grid systems. IEEE Access 8:184976–184987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Huang XL, Ma X, Hu F (2018) Machine learning and intelligent communications. Mob Netw Appl 23(1):68–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Latorre G, Pérez-Arriaga IJ, Ramos A, Román J (1993) Static models for long-term transmission planning. PhD thesis, Ph. D., Universidad Pontificia Comillas, Madrid, Spain

  4. Zakeri AS, Askarian Abyaneh H (2017) Transmission expansion planning using tlbo algorithm in the presence of demand response resources. Energies 10(9):1376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Lumbreras S, Ramos A (2016) The new challenges to transmission expansion planning. survey of recent practice and literature review. Electr Power Syst Res 134:19–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Baringo L, Baringo A (2017) A stochastic adaptive robust optimization approach for the generation and transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 33(1):792–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zakeri AS, Gashteroodkhani OA, Niazazari I, Askarian-Abyaneh H (2019) The effect of different non-linear demand response models considering incentive and penalty on transmission expansion planning. Eur J Electr Eng Comput Sci, 3(1)

  8. Hejeejo R, Qiu J (2017) Probabilistic transmission expansion planning considering distributed generation and demand response programs. IET Renew Power Gener 11(5):650–658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Youssef HK, Hackam R (1989) New transmission planning model. IEEE Trans Power Syst 4(1):9–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang JZ, Xu SJ (1997) Linear programming

  11. Norkin VI, Pflug GC, Andrzej R (1998) A branch and bound method for stochastic global optimization. Math Program 83(1–3):425–450

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Binato S, Pereira MVF, Granville S (2001) A new benders decomposition approach to solve transmission network design problems [powerpoint presentation]. In PICA 2001. Innovative Computing for Power-Electric Energy Meets the Market. 22nd IEEE Power Engineering Society. In: International Conference on Power Industry Computer Applications (Cat. No. 01CH37195), pages 383–386. IEEE

  13. Tsamasphyrou P, Renaud A, Carpentier P (1999) Transmission network planning: an efficient benders decomposition scheme. In: Proceedings of the 13th PSCC, pages 487–494

  14. Bahiense L, Oliveira GC, Pereira M, Granville S (2001) A mixed integer disjunctive model for transmission network expansion. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(3):560–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Romero R, Monticelli A (1994) A hierarchical decomposition approach for transmission network expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 9(1):373–380

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sara L, Andrés R (2016) How to solve the transmission expansion planning problem faster: acceleration techniques applied to benders’ decomposition. IET Gener Transm Distrib 10(10):2351–2359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Delgado MAJ, Pourakbari-Kasmaei M, Rider MJ (2013) A modified branch and bound algorithm to solve the transmission expansion planning problem. In: 2013 13th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC), pages 234–238. Ieee

  18. Zhang H, Vittal V, Heydt GT, Quintero J (2011) A mixed-integer linear programming approach for multi-stage security-constrained transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 27(2):1125–1133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Binato S, De Oliveira GC, De Araújo LJ (2001) A greedy randomized adaptive search procedure for transmission expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 16(2):247–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gallego RA, Alves AB, Monticelli A, Romero R (1997) Parallel simulated annealing applied to long term transmission network expansion planning. IEEE Trans Power Syst 12(1):181–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Handschin E, Heine M, Konig D, Nikodem T, Seibt T, Palma R (1998) Object-oriented software engineering for transmission planning in open access schemes. IEEE Trans Power Syst 13(1):94–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Verma A, Panigrahi BK, Bijwe PR (2010) Harmony search algorithm for transmission network expansion planning. IET Gener Transm Distrib 4(6):663–673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sum-Im T, Taylor GA, Irving MR, Song YH (2009) Differential evolution algorithm for static and multistage transmission expansion planning. IET Gener Transm Distrib 3(4):365–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gallego Ramon A, Romero R, Monticelli Alcir J (2000) Tabu search algorithm for network synthesis. IEEE Trans Power Syst 15(2):490–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Khandelwal A, Bhargava A, Sharma A, Sharma H (2018) Modified grey wolf optimization algorithm for transmission network expansion planning problem. Arab J Sci Eng 43(6):2899–2908

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  26. Sharma A, Sharma H, Bhargava A, Sharma N (2017) Fibonacci series-based local search in spider monkey optimisation for transmission expansion planning. Int J Swarm Intell 3(2–3):215–237

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  27. Hemmati R, Hooshmand RA, Khodabakhshian A (2013) Comprehensive review of generation and transmission expansion planning. IET Gener Transm Distrib 7(9):955–964

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Verma S, Mukherjee V (2018) Investigation of static transmission expansion planning using the symbiotic organisms search algorithm. Eng Optim 50(9):1544–1560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rastgou A, Moshtagh J (2016) Application of firefly algorithm for multi-stage transmission expansion planning with adequacy-security considerations in deregulated environments. Appl Soft Comput 41:373–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Das S, Suganthan Ponnuthurai N (2010) Problem definitions and evaluation criteria for cec 2011 competition on testing evolutionary algorithms on real world optimization problems. Jadavpur University, Nanyang Technological University, Kolkata, pp 341–359

    Google Scholar 

  31. Shivaie M, Mohammad AT (2016) Strategic multiyear transmission expansion planning under severe uncertainties by a combination of melody search algorithm and powell heuristic method. Energy 115:338–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Bouchekara HREH, Abido MA, Boucherma M (2014) Optimal power flow using teaching-learning-based optimization technique. Electr Power Syst Res 114:49–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Gupta N, Khosravy M, Patel N, Senjyu T (2018) A bi-level evolutionary optimization for coordinated transmission expansion planning. IEEE Access 6:48455–48477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Venkata Rao R, Savsani VJ, Vakharia DP (2011) Teaching-learning-based optimization: a novel method for constrained mechanical design optimization problems. Comput Aided Des 43(3):303–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Satapathy SC, Naik A, Parvathi K (2013) Weighted teaching-learning-based optimization for global function optimization

  36. Satapathy SC, Naik A (2014) Modified teaching-learning-based optimization algorithm for global numerical optimization-a comparative study. Swarm Evolut Comput 16:28–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zou F, Wang L, Hei X, Chen D (2015) Teaching-learning-based optimization with learning experience of other learners and its application. Appl Soft Comput 37:725–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Huang J, Gao L, Li X (2015) An effective teaching-learning-based cuckoo search algorithm for parameter optimization problems in structure designing and machining processes. Appl Soft Comput 36:349–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Chen X, Xu B, Mei C, Ding Y, Li K (2018) Teaching-learning-based artificial bee colony for solar photovoltaic parameter estimation. Appl Energy 212:1578–1588

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Kumar MS, Gayathri GV (2015) A short survey on teaching learning based optimization. In: Emerging ICT for Bridging the Future-Proceedings of the 49th Annual Convention of the Computer Society of India CSI Volume 2, pages 173–182. Springer

  41. Satapathy SC, Naik A, Parvathi K (2013) A teaching learning based optimization based on orthogonal design for solving global optimization problems. SpringerPlus 2(1):130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Singh N, Singh SB (2017) A novel hybrid gwo-sca approach for optimization problems. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(6):1586–1601

    Google Scholar 

  43. Shekhawat S, Saxena A (2019) Development and applications of an intelligent crow search algorithm based on opposition based learning. ISA Trans 99:210–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Mirjalili S (2016) Sca: a sine cosine algorithm for solving optimization problems. Knowl Based Syst 96:120–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Saxena A (2019) A comprehensive study of chaos embedded bridging mechanisms and crossover operators for grasshopper optimisation algorithm. Expert Syst Appl 132:166–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Rathore C, Roy R, Sharma U, Patel J (2013) Artificial bee colony algorithm based static transmission expansion planning. In: 2013 International Conference on Energy Efficient Technologies for Sustainability, pages 1126–1131. IEEE

  47. Mirjalili S, Lewis A (2016) The whale optimization algorithm. Adv Eng Softw 95:51–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Williamson David F, Parker Robert A, Kendrick Juliette S (1989) The box plot: a simple visual method to interpret data. Ann Intern Med 110(11):916–921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Garver Len L (1970) Transmission network estimation using linear programming. IEEE Trans Power Appar Syst 7:1688–1697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Romero R, Monticelli A, Garcia A, Haffner S (2002) Test systems and mathematical models for transmission network expansion planning. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 149(1):27–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Sérgio Haffner A, Garcia MA, Romero R (2001) Specialised branch-and-bound algorithm for transmission network expansion planning. IEE Proc Gener Transm Distrib 148(5):482–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Rider MJ, Garcia AV, Romero R (2008) Transmission system expansion planning by a branch-and-bound algorithm. IET Gener Transm Distrib 2(1):90–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electrical Engineering, SKIT, Jaipur, India

    Jitesh Jangid & Akash Saxena

  2. Department of Electrical Engineering, MNIT, Jaipur, India

    Rajesh Kumar & Vishu Gupta

Authors
  1. Jitesh Jangid
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Akash Saxena
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rajesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Vishu Gupta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jitesh Jangid.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jangid, J., Saxena, A., Kumar, R. et al. Transmission expansion planning using composite teaching learning based optimisation algorithm. Evol. Intel. 15, 2691–2713 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00640-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12065-021-00640-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation