Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Distributed duty cycle control for delay improvement in wireless sensor networks

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Dynamically adjusting the time duration of a node to stay active in one data collection period, i.e., duty cycle, is an efficient strategy to save energy and prolong the lifetime of network. In this paper, we propose a novel Adaptation Duty Cycle Control (ADCC) scheme based on feedback signals for wireless sensor networks (WSNs) which can reduce to-sink data transmission delay while lifetime is also improved. In ADCC, every node adaptively adjusts its duty cycle by comparing its own energy consumption with the largest energy consumption of the entire packet delivery flow, which is stored in a feedback ACK packet generated by sink node. Since in WSNs, a huge number of sensor nodes in the area far from the sink node have much remaining energy when network dies, even up to 90 %, these nodes have much larger duty cycles in ADCC compared with previous schemes, therefore the data transmission delay can be reduced to a great extent. Additionally, ADCC provides a largest-energy notification mechanism in order to determine the appropriate duty cycle of nodes in each data collection flow according to the application-dependent requirements. Comparing with the Wake on Idle, Dual-QCon and the Same Duty Cycle (SDC) schemes, ADCC can reduce the delay by more than 59.5 % under the same network lifetime, or increase the lifetime by 32.8 %–63.4 % under the same delay requirements, while also increase energy efficiency as much as 43.1 %.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25
Fig. 26
Fig. 27
Fig. 28
Fig. 29
Fig. 30
Fig. 31
Fig. 32

Similar content being viewed by others

Reference

  1. Zhang Y, He S, Chen J, et al. (2013) Distributed sampling rate control for rechargeable sensor nodes with limited battery capacity. IEEE Trans Wirel Commun 12(6):3096–3106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Zhang H, Cheng P, Shi L, Chen J (2015) Optimal denial-of-service attack scheduling with energy constraint. IEEE Trans Autom Control 60(11):3023–3028

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Luan TH, Cai LX, Chen J, Shen X, Bai F (2014) Engineering a distributed infrastructure for large-scale cost-effective content dissemination over urban vehicular networks. IEEE Trans Veh Technol 63(3):1419–1435

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zhang Y, He S, Chen J (2016) Data Gathering Optimization by Dynamic Sensing and Routing in Rechargeable Sensor Net-works. IEEE/ACM Trans Networking 24(3):1632–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. He S, Chen J, Li X, Shen X, Sun Y (2014) Mobility and intruder prior information improving the barrier coverage of sparse sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 13(6):1268–1282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. He S, Chen J, Jiang F, et al. (2013) Energy provisioning in wireless rechargeable sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(10):1931–1942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Zheng Z, Liu A, Cai L, et al. (2016) Energy and memory efficient clone detection in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(2):788–800

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dai H, Chen G, Wang C, et al. (2015) Quality of energy provisioning for wireless power transfer. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 26(2):527–537

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang L, Cao J, Zhu W, et al. (2015) Accurate and efficient object tracking based on passive RFID. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 14(11):2188–2200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Yang L, Cao J, Cheng HC, et al. (2015) Multi-user computation partitioning for latency sensitive mobile cloud applications. IEEE Trans Comput 64(8):2253–2266

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Dai H, Wu X, Xu L, et al. (2015) Practical scheduling for stochastic event capture in energy harvesting sensor networks. International Journal of Sensor Networks 18(1/2):85–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu X (2015) A deployment strategy for multiple types of requirements in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Cybern 45(10):2364–2376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Byun H, Son S, So J (2013) Queue management based duty cycle control for end-to-end delay guarantees in wireless sensor networks. Wirel Netw 19(6):1349–1360

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tahir M, Farrell R (2013) A cross-layer framework for optimal delay-margin, network lifetime and utility tradeoff in wireless visual sensor networks. Ad Hoc Netw 11:701–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang R, Berder O, Gorce J, Sentieys O (2012) Energy–delay tradeoff in wireless multihop networks with unreliable links. Ad Hoc Netw 10:1306–1321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Long J, Dong M, Ota K, Liu A (2015) Green TDMA scheduling algorithm for prolonging lifetime in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Syst J. doi:10.1109/JSYST.2015.2448355

  17. Liu X, Ota K, Liu A, Chen Z (2016) An incentive game based evolutionary model for crowd sensing networks. Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications 9(4):692–711

  18. Dong M, Ota K, Yang T, Liu A, Guo M. (2016) LSCD: A Low Storage Clone Detecting Protocol for Cyber-Physical Systems. IEEE Trans Comput Aided Des Integr Circuits Syst 35(5): 712–723.

  19. Vasuhi S, Vaidehi V (2016) Target tracking using interactive multiple model for wireless sensor network. Information Fusion 27:41–53

  20. Jamalabdollahi M, Zekavat R, Seyed A (2015) Joint neighbor discovery and time of arrival estimation in wireless sensor networks via OFDMA. IEEE Sensors J 15(10):5821–5833

  21. Oualhaj OA, Kobbane A, Sabir E, et al. (2015) A ferry-assisted solution for forwarding function in wireless sensor networks. Pervasive and Mobile Computing 22:126–135

  22. Gao D, Wu G, Liu Y, et al. (2014) Bounded end-to-end delay with transmission power control techniques for rechargeable wireless sensor networks[J. AEU-International Journal of Electronics and Communications 68(5):395–405

  23. Du, S, Saha, AK, Johnson, DB. (2007) RMAC: a routing-enhanced duty-cycle MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the 26th annual IEEE conference on computer communications (INFOCOM). 2007. p. 1478–86.

  24. Ye, W, John H, Estrin D. (2007) An Energy-efficient MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE Infocom. 2007.

  25. Naveen KP, Anurag K (2013) Relay selection for geographical forwarding in sleep-wake cycling wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mob Comput 12(3):475–488

  26. Shanti C, Sahoo A (2010) DGRAM: A delay guaranteed routing and MAC protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 9(10):1407–1423

  27. Hu Y, Dong M, Ota K, Liu A, Guo M (2015) Mobile Target Detection in Wireless Sensor Networks with Adjustable Sensing Frequency. IEEE Syst J. doi:10.1109/JSYST.2014.2308391

  28. Liu A, Liu X, Liu Y (2016) A comprehensive analysis for fair probability marking based traceback approach in WSNs. Security and Communication Networks. doi:10.1002/ sec.1515

  29. Liu Y, Dong M, Ota K, Liu A (2016) ActiveTrust: secure and trustable routing in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 11(9):2013–2027

  30. Gallego, M. I. V., & Rousseau, F. (2013) Energy efficient neighborhood maintenance and medium access with Wake on Idle. In INFOCOM, 2013 Proceedings IEEE pp. 2931–2939.

  31. Zhang H, Cheng P, Shi L, Chen J (2016) Optimal DoS Attack Scheduling in Wireless Networked Control System. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 24(3):843–852

  32. Chen J, Xu W, He S, Sun Y, Thulasiraman P, Shen X (2016) Utility-based asynchronous flow control algorithm for wireless sensor networks. IEEE J Sel Areas Commun 28(7):1116–1126

  33. Liu Y, Liu A, Chen Z (2015) Analysis and improvement of send-and-wait automatic repeat-reQuest protocols for wireless sensor networks. Wirel Pers Commun 81(3):923–959

  34. Al-Anbagi I, Erol Kantarci M, Mouftah HT (2016) A survey on cross-layer quality of service approaches in wsns for delay and reliability aware applications. IEEE Commun Surv Tutorials 18(1):525–552

  35. Sakaguchi M (1961) Dynamic programming of some sequential sampling design. J. Math. Anal Appl 2(3):446–466

  36. Hu Y, Liu A (2016) Improvement the quality of mobile target detection through portion of node with fully duty cycle in WSNs. Comput Syst Sci Eng 31(1):5–17

  37. Xia L, Shihada B (2015) A Jackson network model and threshold policy for joint optimization of energy and delay in multi-hop wireless networks. Eur J Oper Res 242(3):778–787

  38. OMNet++ Network Simulation Framework, http://www.omnetpp.org/. Accessed July 2015.

  39. Xie R, Liu A, Gao J (2016) A Residual Energy Aware Schedule Scheme for WSNs Employing Adjustable Awake/Sleep Duty Cycle. Wirel Pers Commun. doi:10.1007/s11277-016-3428-0

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (61379110, 61073104, 61572528, 61272494, 61572526), The National Basic Research Program of China (973 Program)(2014CB046305).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhetao Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Liu, A., Li, Z. et al. Distributed duty cycle control for delay improvement in wireless sensor networks. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 10, 559–578 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-016-0501-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-016-0501-0

Keywords

Navigation