Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

IOT based wearable sensor for diseases prediction and symptom analysis in healthcare sector

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Humans with good health condition is some more difficult in today’s life, because of changing food habit and environment. So we need awareness about the health condition to the survival. The health-support systems faces significant challenges like lack of adequate medical information, preventable errors, data threat, misdiagnosis, and delayed transmission. To overcome this problem, here we proposed wearable sensor which is connected to Internet of things (IoT) based big data i.e. data mining analysis in healthcare. Moreover, here we design Generalize approximate Reasoning base Intelligence Control (GARIC) with regression rules to gather the information about the patient from the IoT. Finally, Train the data to the Artificial intelligence (AI) with the use of deep learning mechanism Boltzmann belief network. Subsequently Regularization _ Genome wide association study (GWAS) is used to predict the diseases. Thus, if the people has affected by some diseases they will get warning by SMS, emails. Etc., after that they got some treatments and advisory from the doctors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tsai C-W et al (2014) Data mining for internet of things: a survey. IEEE Commun Surv Tutor 16(1):77–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lieberman H, Selker T (2000) Out of context: computer systems that adapt to, and learn from, context. IBM Syst J 39.3(4):617–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Yen, Wei, and Steven Weinstein. "Information retrieval system using an internet multiplexer to focus user selection." U.S. Patent No. 5,991,799. 23 Nov. 1999

  4. Lighthill MJ, Whitham GB (1955) On kinematic waves II. A theory of traffic flow on long crowded roads. Proc R Soc London Ser A Math Phys Sci 229(1178):317–345

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Pham TN et al (2015) A cloud-based smart-parking system based on internet-of-things technologies. IEEE Access 3:1581–1591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Palattella MR et al (2016) Internet of things in the 5G era: enablers, architecture, and business models. IEEE J Select Areas Commun 34(3):510–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Swan M (2012) Sensor mania! The internet of things, wearable computing, objective metrics, and the quantified self 2.0. J Sens Actuator Netw 1(3):217–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Alleckson TD et al. Home hub for reporting patient health parameters. U.S. Patent No. 6,336,900. 8 Jan. 2002

  9. Gorbien MJ et al (1992) Iatrogenic illness in hospitalized elderly people. J Am Geriatr Soc 40(10):1031–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ku YW (2008) Comparative welfare policy instruments in East Asia: Embedding trust in policy. Changing Governance and Public Policy in East Asia. Routledge, 160–178

  11. Pieczenik SR, Neustadt J (2007) Mitochondrial dysfunction and molecular pathways of disease. Exp Mol Pathol 83(1):84–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Bird RB, Smith E, Bird DW (2001) The hunting handicap: costly signaling in human foraging strategies. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 50(1):9–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Sutherland EH (1940) White-collar criminality. YB 138

  14. Bhalla G (2010) Collaboration and Co-creation. Springer, New York, pp 1–16

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Atzori L, Iera A, Morabito G (2010) The internet of things: a survey. Comput Netw 54(15):2787–2805

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Madhumathi R et al. A comprehensive survey of IoT edge/fog computing protocols." Handbook of Research on Cloud and Fog Computing Infrastructures for Data Science IGI Global, 2018. 85–107

  17. Crawford LC (2008) Transgender without organs? Mobilizing a geo-affective theory of gender modification. Women's Stud Q 36(3/4):127–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Engel GL (1978) The biopsychosocial model and the education of health professionals. Ann N Y Acad Sci 310(1):169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Paas FG (1992) Training strategies for attaining transfer of problem-solving skill in statistics: A cognitive-load approach. J Educ Psychol 84(4):429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Teece DJ (1998) Capturing value from knowledge assets: the new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets. Calif Manag Rev 40(3):55–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Solow RM (1957) Technical change and the aggregate production function. Rev Econ Stat:312–320

  22. Gregg KR (1990) The variable competence model of second language acquisition, and why it isn’t. Appl Linguis 11(4):364–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. McAfee AP (2006) Enterprise 2.0: the dawn of emergent collaboration. Enterprise 2:15–26

    Google Scholar 

  24. Teece DJ (1986) Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy. Res Policy 15(6):285–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Saheb T, Izadi L (2019) Paradigm of IoT big data analytics in healthcare industry: a review of scientific literature and mapping of research trends. Telematics Inform

  26. Amin SU et al (2019) Cognitive smart healthcare for pathology detection and monitoring. IEEE Access 7:10745–10753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Syed L et al. (2019) Data science algorithms and techniques for smart healthcare using IoT and big data analytics. Smart Techniques for a Smarter Planet. Springer, Cham: 211–241.

  28. Manogaran G et al (2018) Machine learning based big data processing framework for cancer diagnosis using hidden Markov model and GM clustering. Wirel Pers Commun 102(3):2099–2116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Das A et al (2019) Distributed machine learning cloud teleophthalmology IoT for predicting AMD disease progression. Futur Gener Comput Syst 93:486–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zonta G et al (2018) Use of gas sensors and FOBT for the early detection of colorectal cancer. Sensors Actuators B Chem 262:884–891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhao D, Liu H, Zheng Y, He Y, Lu D, Lyu C (2019) A reliable method for colorectal cancer prediction based on feature selection and support vector machine. Med Biol Eng Comput 57(4):901–912

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Kim S-J, Pak K, Kim K (2019) Diagnostic performance of F-18 FDG PET/CT for prediction of KRAS mutation in colorectal cancer patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Abdomin Radiol:1–9

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, V.R.S. College of Engineering & Technology, Tamil Nadu, India

    BalaAnand Muthu

  2. Department of Computer Science & Engineering, SNS College of Technology, Tamil Nadu, India

    C. B. Sivaparthipan

  3. Department of Computer Science, University of California, Davis, CA, USA

    Gunasekaran Manogaran

  4. Department of Computer Science, Anna University, Tamil Nadu, India

    Revathi Sundarasekar

  5. Beirut Arab University, Beirut, Lebanon

    Seifedine Kadry

  6. SRM University, Tamil Nadu, India

    A. Shanthini

  7. Vellore Institute of Technology, Tamil Nadu, India

    Antony Dasel

Authors
  1. BalaAnand Muthu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. C. B. Sivaparthipan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gunasekaran Manogaran
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Revathi Sundarasekar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Seifedine Kadry
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. A. Shanthini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Antony Dasel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. B. Sivaparthipan.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Muthu, B., Sivaparthipan, C.B., Manogaran, G. et al. IOT based wearable sensor for diseases prediction and symptom analysis in healthcare sector. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 13, 2123–2134 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-019-00823-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-019-00823-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation