Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A novel manufacturing service model transformation method based on product lifecycle

  • Published:
Peer-to-Peer Networking and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the increase of personalized customization and collaborative production requirements, more and more manufacturing enterprises virtualize and publish their resources and capabilities as cloud services for sharing. However, due to the lack of a general modelling method in the sharing process, data cannot be interpenetrated among different life cycle stages. Also, models built in a lifecycle stage cannot be transformed and propagated to other stages. To alleviate these drawbacks, in this paper, a novel service model transformation method based on product lifecycle is designed and developed to model and transform manufacturing services among different life cycle stages efficiently and accurately. Specifically, based on the discussion of the business model of life cycle service in cloud manufacturing environment, a novel service model transformation method which includes general and view service transformation is proposed and elaborated. Then, the life cycle service model is established mathematically, and eight transformation operators are summarized and their mathematical definitions are given in detail. Meanwhile, the transformation logic process and change propagation are studied. The proposed method is superior to previous methods in that: 1) the model established in this paper is a generic model which can run through different life cycle stages, including both general and personalized data; 2) the eight operator definitions cover most of the operation types in the model transformation process, which greatly improves the operability of the model automatic transformation; 3) the establishment of change propagation mechanism ensures the accuracy of model synchronization when data changes. The successful application in an instrument enterprise demonstrates the rationality and effectiveness of the proposed methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zhang L, Luo YL, Tao F, Li BH, Ren L, Zhang XS, Hua G, Cheng Y, Hu AR, Liu YK (2014) Cloud manufacturing: a new manufacturing paradigm. Enter Inf Syst-UK 8(2):167–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Borangiu T, Trentesaux D, Thomas A, Leitão P, Barata J (2019) Digital transformation of manufacturing through cloud services and resource virtualization. Comput Ind 108:150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Li JR, Tao F, Cheng Y, Zhao LJ (2015) Big Data in product lifecycle management. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 81:667–684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Vezzetti E, Violante MG, Marcolin F (2014) A benchmarking framework for product lifecycle management (PLM) maturity models. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 71:899–918

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hedberg T, Feeney AB, Helu M, Camelio JA (2017) Toward a lifecycle information framework and technology in manufacturing. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 17:021010

  6. Shin JH, Kiritsis D, Xirouchakis P (2015) Design modification supporting method based on product usage data in closed-loop PLM. Int J Comput Integ M 28(6):551–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Moghaddam M, Nof SY (2018) Collaborative service-component integration in cloud manufacturing. Int J Prod Res 56(1–2):677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Luo Y, Zhang L, Tao F et al (2013) A modelling and description method of multidimensional information for manufacturing capability in cloud manufacturing system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(5–8):961–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Liu N, Li X (2012) A resource virtualization mechanism for cloud manufacturing systems. International IFIP Working Conference on Enterprise Interoperability, Springer, Berlin Heidelberg 122:46–59

    Google Scholar 

  10. Liu N, Li XP, Shen WM (2014) Multi-granularity resource virtualization and sharing strategies in cloud manufacturing. J Netw Comput Appl 46:72–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Xu W, Yu J, Zhou Z et al (2015) Dynamic modelling of manufacturing equipment capability using condition information in cloud manufacturing. J Manuf Sci E-T ASME 137(4):040907

  12. Li ZH, Nie FP, Chang XJ et al (2018) Rank-Constrained spectral clustering with flexible embedding. IEEE Transactions on neural networks and learning systems 29(12):6073–6082

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Li ZH, Nie FP, Chang XJ et al (2018) Dynamic affinity graph construction for spectral clustering using multiple features. IEEE Transactions on neural networks and learning systems 29(12):6323–6332

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Talhi A, Fortineau V, Huet JC et al (2019) Ontology for cloud manufacturing based product lifecycle management. J Intell Manuf 30:2171–2192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhao YY, Liu Q, Xu WJ, Wu XX et al (2017) Dynamic and unified modelling of sustainable manufacturing capability for industrial robots in cloud manufacturing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 93(5–8):2753–2771

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Guo H, Shu M (2018) Research on the cloud service description model for cloud service composition in cloud manufacturing system. J Phys Conf Ser 052015:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  17. Yu CY, Mou SD, Ji YJ et al (2018) a delayed product differentiation model for cloud manufacturing. Comput Ind Eng 117:60–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Duan YY, Han K (2017) Self-organization evolution model of cloud manufacturing service collaborative network. AMME 2017:210–213

    Google Scholar 

  19. Namchul D (2017) Integration of design and manufacturing data to support personal manufacturing based on 3D printing services. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 90:3761–3773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Camba JD, Contero M, Company P, Pérez D (2017) On the integration of model-based feature information in product lifecycle management systems. Int J Inform Manage 37(6):611–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liu XL, Wang WM, Guo HY, Barenji AV, Li Z, Huang GQ (2019) Industrial blockchain based framework for product lifecycle management in industry 4.0. Robot Comput Integr Manuf 63(1):1–16

  22. Myrodia A, Randrup T, Hvam L (2019) Configuration lifecycle management maturity model. Comput Ind 106:30–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Lam HY, Tsang YP, Wu CH, Tang Valerie (2020) Data analytics and the P2P cloud: an integrated model for strategy formulation based on customer behavior. Peer Peer Netw Appl (4)

  24. Ali MM , Doumbouya MB , Louge T et al (2020) Ontology-based approach to extract product's design features from online customers' reviews. Comput Ind 116:103175

  25. Souri ME, Gao J, Simmonds C (2019) Integrating manufacturing knowledge with design process to improve quality in the aerospace industry. Procedia CIRP 84:374–379

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ko T, Lee JH, Cho H, Cho S, Lee W, Lee M (2017) Machine learning-based anomaly detection via integration of manufacturing, inspection and after-sales service data. Ind Manag Data Syst 117(5):927–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Li ZH, Yao LN, Chang XJ et al (2019) Zero-shot event detection via event-adaptive concept relevance mining. Pattern Recogn 88:595–603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wisnesky R, Breiner S, Jones A, et al (2016) Using category theory to facilitate multiple manufacturing service database integration. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 16(2):021011

  29. Helu M, Joseph A, Hedberg T (2018) A standards-based approach for linking as-planned to as-fabricated product data. CIRP Ann - Manuf Techn 67:487–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mekki K, Derigent W, Rondeau E et al (2017) Data lifecycle management in smart building using wireless sensors networks. IFAC-PapersOnLine 50–1:12944–12949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Li DC, Wen IH, Chen WC (2016) A novel data transformation model for small data-set learning. Int J Prod Res 54(24):7453–7463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Calvar TL, Chhel F, Jouault F et al (2021) Coupling solvers with model transformations to generate explorable model sets. Softw Syst Model 20:1633–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Xiang F, Huang YY, Zhang Z, Jiang GZ, Zuo Y (2019) Research on ECBOM modelling and energy consumption evaluation based on BOM multi-view transformation. J Amb Intel Hum Comp 10:953–967

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Rutle A, Lovino L, König H et al (2020) A query-retyping approach to model transformation co-evolution. Softw Syst Model 19:1107–1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Rondini A, Pezzotta G, Cavalieri S et al (2018) Standardizing delivery processes to support service transformation: A case of a multinational manufacturing firm. Comput Ind 100:115–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Costa G, Sicilia A (2020) Alternatives for facilitating automatic transformation of BIM data using sematic query languages. Automat Constr 120:103384

  37. Zhu LL (2019) Research on building semantic model transformation based on integration of BIM and GIS. Central China Normal University 5:35–39 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Platenius-Mohr M, Malakuti S, Grüner S, Schmitt J, Goldschmidt T (2020) File- and API-based interoperability of digital twins by model transformation: An IIoT case study using asset administration shell. Future Gener Comp Sy 113:94–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Burgueño L, Cabot J, Li S et al (2021) A generic LSTM neural network architecture to infer heterogeneous model transformations. Softw Syst Model: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00893-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Höppner S, Kehrer T, Tichy M (2021) Constrasting dedicated model transformation languages versus general purpose languages: a historical perspective on ATL versus Java based on complexity and size. Softw Syst Model: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00937-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Jesús B, Lucía DV, Pedro A, Ana N (2019) A safety analysis of roundabouts and turbo roundabouts based on Petri nets. Traffic Inj Prev 20(4):400–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Panahandeh M, Hamdaqa M, Zamani B et al (2021) MUPPIT: a method for using proper patterns in model transformations. Softw Syst Model 20:1491–1523

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Azizi B, Zamani B, Kolahdouz-Rahimi S (2020) SEET: Symbolic execution of ETL transformations. J Syst Softw 168:110675

  44. Chu CY, Ren XS, Sun AC (2018) Platform independent model transformation based on sysml. Comput Appl Softw 35(12):7–11 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Qi LQ, Wang CC, Wang CD (2020) Key Factors of the transformation of port’s equipment manufacturing and producer services based on virtual alliance. J Coastal Res103:654–657

  46. Rodriguez-Echeverria R, Macias F, Rutle A et al (2021) Suggesting model transformation repairs for rule-based languages using a contract-based testing approach. Softw Syst Model: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10270-021-00891-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Xu B, Qi J, Hu XX, Leung KS et al (2018) Self-adaptive bat algorithm for large scale cloud manufacturing service composition. Peer Peer Netw Appl 11:1115–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project of China under Grant No. 2018ZX04001006.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering and Automation, Beihang University, Beijing, China

    Tao Ding, Guangrong Yan, Zhenggan Zhou & Yi Lei

  2. The National Engineering Laboratory of Intelligent, Collaborative Manufacturing Technology and Application, Beijing, China

    Tao Ding, Guangrong Yan & Yi Lei

Authors
  1. Tao Ding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Guangrong Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhenggan Zhou
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yi Lei
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guangrong Yan.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ding, T., Yan, G., Zhou, Z. et al. A novel manufacturing service model transformation method based on product lifecycle. Peer-to-Peer Netw. Appl. 15, 1638–1652 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-022-01311-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12083-022-01311-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation