Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Event sequence interpretation of structural geological models: a knowledge-based approach

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Access to information about the occurrence of past geological events and their chronology is crucial to cognize the evolution of subsurface structures. We refer to such tasks as Event Sequence Interpretation (ESI). The sequence of events describes the process of structural evolution and is the basis for structural interpretation and structural geological modeling. ESI has not been highly automated due to the need of a large amount of expert knowledge. However, manual ESI can introduce cognitive biases and is also difficult in structurally complex regions, thus affecting the credibility of structural interpretations. Therefore, we propose a knowledge-based ESI approach for structural geological models in this paper. A hierarchical cognition model lays the foundation for the ESI apptoach. A knowledge representation meta-model is used to formally represent the knowledge of geological events. Each instance of the meta-model is called an Event Pattern, which describes the associations between the occurrence of geological events and the geometric configuration of structural elements (geological surfaces and geological bodies). The chronology of geological events comes from the spatial relations of the structural elements. Our method can quickly infer the spatial relations between structural elements from the structural interpretation data and derive the possible temporal relationships between events from these spatial relationships. By demonstrating event sequence-guided structural modeling, we show the positive impact of event sequences on structural geological modeling.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abel M, Silva AL, De Ros LF, Mastella LS, Campbell JA, Novello T (2004) Petrographer: managing petrographic data and knowledge using an intelligent database application. Expert Syst Appl 26(1):9–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0957-4174(03)00104-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen JF (1990) Maintaining knowledge about temporal intervals. Commun. ACM 26(11):361–372. https://doi.org/10.1145/182.358434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Babaie HA, Oldow JS, Babaei A, Lallemant H GA, Watkinson AJ, Sinha AK (2006) Designing a modular architecture for the structural geology ontology. SPECIAL PAPERS-GEOLOGICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA 397:269. https://doi.org/10.1130/2006.2397(21)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bharadwaj SS, Kumar RC, Sumukha BN, George K (2017) Pattern classification with meta-cognition and online sequential learning algorithm. In: 2017 International joint conference on neural networks (IJCNN), pp 1932–1939. IEEE

  • Biasotti S, Marini S, Mortara M, Patane G, Spagnuolo M, Falcidieno B (2003) 3d shape matching through topological structures. In: International conference on discrete geometry for computer imagery, pp 194–203. Springer

  • Bond CE (2015) Uncertainty in structural interpretation: Lessons to be learnt. J Struct Geol 74 (may):185–200. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsg.2015.03.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boote DavidRD (2018) The geological history of the istria ‘depression’, romanian black sea shelf: tectonic controls on second-/third-order sequence architecture. Geological Society, London, Special Publications 464 (1):169–209

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Borgo S, Masolo C (2009) Foundational choices in dolce. In: Handbook on ontologies, pp 361–381. Springer

  • Burns KL (1975) Analysis of geological events. J Int Assoc Math Geol 7(4):295–321. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02081703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbonera JL, Abel M, Scherer ClaitonMS (2015) Visual interpretation of events in petroleum exploration: An approach supported by well-founded ontologies. Expert Systems with applications 42(5):2749–2763. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2014.11.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cen H, Koedinger K, Junker B (2006) Learning factors analysis–a general method for cognitive model evaluation and improvement. In: International conference on intelligent tutoring systems, pp 164–175. Springer

  • Chan CW (2002) Cognitive informatics: A knowledge engineering perspective. In: Proceedings first IEEE international conference on cognitive informatics, pp 49–56. IEEE

  • Chen D, Tucker ME, Jiang M, Zhu J (2001) Long-distance correlation between tectonic-controlled, isolated carbonate platforms by cyclostratigraphy and sequence stratigraphy in the devonian of south china. Sedimentology 48(1):57–78. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2008.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Egenhofer M (1990) A mathematical framework for the definition of topological relations. In: Proc. the fourth international symposium on spatial data handing, pp 803–813

  • Ford GP, Zhang J (1992) Structural graph-matching approach to image understanding. In: Intelligent robots and computer vision X: Algorithms and techniques, vol 1607, pp 559–569. International society for optics and photonics

  • Gero JS (1990) Design prototypes: a knowledge representation schema for design. AI magazine 11(4):26–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruber TR (1993) A translation approach to portable ontology specifications. Knowledge acquisition 5(2):199–220. https://doi.org/10.1006/knac.1993.1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guarino N (1994) The ontological level. Philosophy and the cognitive sciences

  • Guizzardi G (2011) Ontological foundations for conceptual part-whole relations: The case of collectives and their parts. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Haghighi PD, Burstein F, Zaslavsky A, Arbon P (2013) Development and evaluation of ontology for intelligent decision support in medical emergency management for mass gatherings. Decis Support Syst 54(2):1192–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haproff PJ (2018) Tectonic evolution of the easternmost himalayan collisional system. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Los Angeles

  • Hoyes J, Cheret T (2011) A review of ‘global’ interpretation methods for automated 3d horizon picking. Lead Edge 30(1):38–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johansson I (2000) Determinables as universals. Monist 83(1):101–121. https://doi.org/10.5840/monist20008312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson WE (1921) Logic. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Latecki LJ, Lakämper R, Wolter D (2003) Shape similarity and visual parts. In: International conference on discrete geometry for computer imagery, pp 34–51. Springer

  • Li L, Sugumaran V (2019) A cognitive-based aes model towards learning written english. J AMB INTEL HUM COMP 10(5):1811–1820. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0743-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim SL, Kurashov A, Bentley P (2016) Higher order cognition using computers: Learning abstract concepts with recursive graph-based self organizing maps. In: Proceedings of the artificial life conference 2016 13, pp 398–405. MIT Press

  • Liu C, Zhu E, Zhang Q, Wei X (2018) Modeling of agent cognition in extensive games via artificial neural networks. IEEE transactions on neural networks and learning systems 29(10):4857–4868. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2017.2782266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomask J, Clapp RG, Biondi B (2007) Application of image segmentation to tracking 3d salt boundaries. Geophysics 72(4):P47–P56. https://doi.org/10.1190/1.2732553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzatti A, Abel M, Fiorini SR, Bernardes AK, dos SantosScherer CM (2010) Ontological primitives for visual knowledge. In: Brazilian symposium on artificial intelligence, pp 1–10. Springer

  • Malik J, Binford TO (1983) Reasoning in time and space. In: IJCAI, vol 83, pp 343–345

  • Masolo C, Borgo S, Gangemi A, Guarino N, Oltramari A (2003) Wonderweb deliverable d18, ontology library (final). ICT project 33052:31

    Google Scholar 

  • Mastella LS, Abel M, DeRos LF, Perrin M, Rainaud J-F (2007) Event ordering reasoning ontology applied to petrology and geological modelling. In: Theoretical advances and applications of fuzzy logic and soft computing, pp 465–475. Springer

  • Mastella LS, Abel M, Lamb LC, DeRos LF (2005) Cognitive modelling of event ordering reasoning in imagistic domains. . In: International joint conference on artificial intelligence, vol 19, pp 528. LAWRENCE ERLBAUM ASSOCIATES LTD

  • Perrin M, Rainaud J-F (2013) Shared earth modeling: Knowledge driven solutions for building and managing subsurface 3d geological models

  • Rey J, Somoza L, Martínez-Frías J (1995) Tectonic, volcanic, and hydrothermal event sequence on deception island (antarctica). Geo-Mar Lett 15(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01204491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smalley I, O’Hara-Dhand K, Wint J, Machalett B, Jary Z, Jefferson I (2009) Rivers and loess: the significance of long river transportation in the complex event-sequence approach to loess deposit formation. Quat Int 198(1-2):7–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.quaint.2008.06.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wellmann F, Caumon G (2018) 3-d structural geological models: Concepts, methods, and uncertainties. Adv Geophys 59:1–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.agph.2018.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X (2017) Directional structure-tensor-based coherence to detect seismic faults and channels. Geophysics 82(2):A13–A17. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2016-0473.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu X, Liang L, Shi Y, Fomel S (2019) Faultseg3d: Using synthetic data sets to train an end-to-end convolutional neural network for 3d seismic fault segmentation. Geophysics 84(3):IM35–IM45. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2018-0646.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong W, Ji X, Ma Y, Wang Y, AlBinHassan NM, Ali MN, Luo Y (2018) Seismic fault detection with convolutional neural network. Geophysics 83(5):O97–O103. https://doi.org/10.1190/geo2017-0666.1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Z, Wang S, Yang X, Jiang F, Shen J, Li X (2004) Evidence of a geological event and environmental change in the catchment area of the yellow river at 0.15 ma. Quat Int 117(1):35–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhong J, McGuinness DL, Antonellini M, Aydin A (2005) Ontology for structural geology. In: AGU fall meeting abstracts

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Cai Lu.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhan, X., Lu, C. & Hu, G. Event sequence interpretation of structural geological models: a knowledge-based approach. Earth Sci Inform 14, 99–118 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00558-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-020-00558-2

Keywords

Navigation