Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of ionospheric-constrained single-frequency PPP enhanced with an improved stochastic model

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Earth Science Informatics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ionospheric delay is the most important environmental factor affecting the positioning performance of single-frequency precise point positioning (SF-PPP). If external ionospheric information is introduced and the weight of ionospheric pseudo-observation is reasonably set, positioning performance can be improved. In this paper, the stochastic model of ionospheric-constrained (IC) SF-PPP, as well as the positioning performances of ionospheric-unconstrained (IU) SF-PPP, ionospheric-free (IF) SF-PPP and IC SF-PPP models were studied. Multi-Global Navigation Satellite System (GNSS) observations of 42 stations from the Multi-GNSS Experiment (MGEX) for 7 days were processed. Firstly, the four classical stochastic models of IC SF-PPP were optimized based on the posterior residual correction (PRC) method. The results show that the PRC method has the highest positioning accuracy improvement (42.4%, 51%, and 56.1%) in the east, north, and up (E, N, U) directions on the IC model. The positioning accuracy results of the IC SF-PPP model using the optimal stochastic model in the E, N, and U directions are 59.8, 42.1 and 31.2% higher than those of the IU SF-PPP model for a one-day period. Second, the short-term positioning performances of three SF-PPP models were compared. The experiments show that the IU SF-PPP model has higher positioning accuracy than the IF model, but the convergence performance is opposite. The IC model has the best positioning performance, especially in dynamic mode. In addition, the short-term positioning performance of IC model in E and N directions is slightly changed when adding multi-GNSS observations and does not differ much in static and dynamic modes. Therefore, IC model using the improved stochastic model is the most cost-effective model for dynamic single-system users in SF-PPP.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdelazeem M, Çelik R (2017) An improved regional ionospheric model for single-frequency GNSS users. Surv Rev 49:153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avstedal O (2002) Absolute positioning with single-frequency GPS receivers. GPS Solutions 5(4):33–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, Gong Y (2017) An approach to speed up single-frequency PPP convergence with quad-constellation GNSS and GIM. Sensors 17(6):1302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai C, Liu Z (2013) Single-frequency ionosphere-free precise point positioning using combined GPS and GLONASS observations. J Navig 66(3):417–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choy S, Bisnath S (2017) Uncovering common misconceptions in GNSS precise point positioning and its future prospect. GPS Solutions 21(1):13–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feltens J (2003) The international GPS service (IGS) ionosphere working group. Adv Space Res. D. Bilitza, K. Rawer and B. W. Reinisch. KIDLINGTON, PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD 31:635–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geng J, Teferle FN (2010) Kinematic precise point positioning at remote marine platforms. GPS Solutions 14(4):343–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guo F, Li X (2017) Assessment of precise orbit and clock products for Galileo, BeiDou, and QZSS from IGS multi-GNSS experiment (MGEX). GPS Solutions 21(1):279–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lejeune S, Wautelet G (2012) Ionospheric effects on relative positioning within a dense GPS network. GPS Solutions 16(1):105–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li S, Li L (2017) Comparative analysis of three ionospheric broadcast models for global navigation satellite systems. Acta Geophys 65(2):1–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Li P, Zhang X (2014) Integrating GPS and GLONASS to accelerate convergence and initialization times of precise point positioning. GPS Solutions 18(3):461–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu T, Yuan Y (2017) Multi-GNSS precise point positioning (MGPPP) using raw observations. J Geod 91(3):253–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lou Y, Zheng F (2016) Multi-GNSS precise point positioning with raw single-frequency and dual-frequency measurement models. GPS Solutions 20(4):849–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ning Y, Han H (2018) Single-frequency precise point positioning enhanced with multi-GNSS observations and global ionosphere maps. Meas Sci Technol 30(1):15013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sterle O, Stopar B (2015) Single-frequency precise point positioning: an analytical approach. J Geod 89(8):793–810

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sz A, Dy A (2021) Comparative analysis of four different single-frequency PPP models on positioning performance and atmosphere delay retrieval. Adv Space Res 67(12):3994–3401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tu R, Ge M, Zhang H (2013) The realization and convergence analysis of combined PPP based on raw observation. Adv Space Res 52(1):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stankov SM,Warnant R (2009)Trans-ionospheric GPS signal delay gradients observed over mid-latitude Europe. Adv Space Res 43(9):1314–1324

  • Xiang Y, Gao Y (2017) Carrier phase-based ionospheric observables using PPP models. Geod Geodyn 8(1):17–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yunck TP (1993) Coping with the atmosphere and ionosphere in precise satellite and ground positioning. Environmental Effects on Spacecraft Positioning and Trajectories.  American Geophysical Union, Washington, DC

  • Zang N, Li B, Shen Y (2017) Comparison and analysis of three GPS+BDS PPP models. Acta Geodetica et Cartographica Sinica 46(12):1929–1938

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H, Gao Z (2013) On the convergence of ionospheric constrained precise point positioning (IC-PPP) based on Undifferential uncombined raw GNSS observations. Sensors 13(11):15708–15725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang B, Teunissen PJG (2018) Joint estimation of vertical total electron content (VTEC) and satellite differential code biases (SDCBs) using low-cost receivers. J Geod 92(4):401–413

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu S, Yue D (2020) A formal dynamic stochastic model for single-frequency precise point positioning constrained by global ionosphere map. Meas Sci Technol 32(3)

  • Zumberge JF, Heflin MB, Jeferson DC (1997) Precise point positioning for the efficient and robust analysis of GPS data from large networks. J Geophys Res Solid Earth 102(B3):5005–5017

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the State Key Laboratory of Geo-Information Engineering and Key Laboratory of Surveying and Mapping Science and Geospatial Information Technology of MNR, CASM (No. 2021-01-07).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuhui Li.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Communicated by: H. Babaie

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shen, H., Li, S., Li, L. et al. Evaluation of ionospheric-constrained single-frequency PPP enhanced with an improved stochastic model. Earth Sci Inform 15, 1671–1681 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-022-00827-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12145-022-00827-2

Keywords

Navigation