Skip to main content
Log in

Factor-specific Malmquist productivity index based on common weights DEA

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper designs a Malmquist productivity index (MPI) to measure the productivity change of a decision-making unit (DMU) on a specific input/output factor over time. First, factor-specific data envelopment analysis is extended by considering input/output substitution possibilities, where partial correlation is taken as the criterion of substitutability. Factors are clustered and those which are not in the same cluster with the concerned one are excluded when calculating the factor-specific efficiency. Next, the common weights global MPI is employed, in order to simultaneously have the sound properties of consistency, circularity and comparability. Common weights are generated separately for each DMU, since only the productivities of a same DMU at different periods need to be compared in the calculation process of MPI. The case of Taiwan forests after reorganization illustrates that the proposed models can provide new insights into the productivity change of DMUs.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler N, Golany B (2001) Evaluation of deregulated airline networks using data envelopment analysis combined with principal component analysis with an application to Western Europe. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):260–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler N, Golany B (2002) Including principal component weights to improve discrimination in data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 53(9):985–991

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adler N, Yazhemsky E (2010) Improving discrimination in data envelopment analysis: PCA–DEA or variable reduction. Eur J Oper Res 202(1):273–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banker RD, Morey RC (1986) Efficiency analysis for exogenously fixed inputs and outputs. Oper Res 34(4):513–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bi GB, Ding JJ, Luo Y, Liang L (2011) A new malmquist productivity index based on semi-discretionary variables with an application to commercial banks of china. Int J Inf Technol Decis Mak 10:713–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982a) Multilateral comparisons of output, input, and productivity using superlative index numbers. Econ J 73–86

  • Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982b) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econom: J Econom Soc 393–1414

  • Chang H, Choy HL, Cooper WW, Ruefli TW (2009) Using Malmquist Indexes to measure changes in the productivity and efficiency of US accounting firms before and after the Sarbanes–Oxley Act. Omega-Int J Manag Sci 37:951–960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Y (2003) A non-radial Malmquist productivity index with an illustrative application to Chinese major industries. Int J Prod Econ 83:27–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (2011) Handbook on data envelopment analysis. 164, Springer

  • Dyson RG, Allen R, Camanho AS, Podinovski VV, Sarrico CS, Shale EA (2001) Pitfalls and protocols in DEA. Eur J Oper Res 132(2):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Lindgren B, Roos P (1992) Productivity changes in Swedish pharamacies 1980–1989: a non-parametric Malmquist approach. J Prod Anal 3(1):85–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 66–83

  • Ferrier GD, Valdmanis VG (2004) Do mergers improve hospital productivity? J Oper Res Soc 55:1071–1080

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foroughi AA (2012) A modified common weight model for maximum discrimination in technology selection. Int J Prod Res 50(14):3841–3846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins L, Anderson M (2003) A multivariate statistical approach to reducing the number of variables in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 147(1):51–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2000) Measuring the performance improvement of Taiwan forests after reorganization. For Sci 46:577–584

    Google Scholar 

  • Kao C (2010) Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: the case of Taiwan forests after reorganization. Omega-Int J Manag Sci 38:484–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Hung HT (2005) Data envelopment analysis with common weights: the compromise solution approach. J Oper Res Soc 56:1196–1203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kao C, Yang YC (1992) Reorganization of forest districts via efficiency measurement. Eur J Oper Res 58:356–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsak EE, Ahiska SS (2005) Practical common weight multi-criteria decision-making approach with an improved discriminating power for technology selection. Int J Prod Res 43:1537–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karsak EE, Ahiska SS (2008) Improved common weight MCDM model for technology selection. Int J Prod Res 46(24):6933–6944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference surfaces. Trabajos de Estadistica y de Investigacion Operativa 4(2):209–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nataraja NR, Johnson AL (2011) Guidelines for using variable selection techniques in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 215:662–669

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odeck J (2006) Identifying traffic safety best practice: an application of DEA and Malmquist indices. Omega-Int J Manag Sci 34:28–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliveira MM, Gaspar MB, Paixao BJP, Camanho AS (2009) Productivity change of the artisanal fishing fleet in Portugal: a Malmquist index analysis. Fish Res 95:189–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pastor JT, Lovell CA (2005) A global Malmquist productivity index. Econ Lett 88(2):266–271

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thanassoulis E, Dyson RG (1992) Estimating preferred target input–output levels using data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 56(1):80–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tofallis C (1997) Input efficiency profiling: an application to airlines. Comput Oper Res 24(3):253–258

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tohidi G, Razavyan S (2013) A circular global profit Malmquist productivity index in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Model 37:216–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tone K (2001) A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 130:498–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ueda T, Hoshiai Y (1997) Application of principal component analysis for parsimonious summarization of DEA inputs and/or outputs. J Oper Res Soc Jpn-Keiei Kagaku 40(4):466–487

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaz CB, Camanho AS (2012) Performance comparison of retailing stores using a Malmquist-type index. J Oper Res Soc 63:631–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xue XL, Shen QP, Wang YW, Lu JF (2008) Measuring the productivity of the construction industry in China by using DEA-based Malmquist productivity indices. J Constr Eng Manag Asce 134:64–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (2000) Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. Eur J Oper Res 123:105–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the anonymous referees for their constructive comments which substantially improved the first version of this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Youliang Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, B., Zhang, Y., Zhang, H. et al. Factor-specific Malmquist productivity index based on common weights DEA. Oper Res Int J 16, 51–70 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0185-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0185-x

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation