Skip to main content
Log in

Multiobjective large scale job sequencing optimization based on a synergy of compensatory and non compensatory methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During the last years, the manufacturing industry is experiencing an increasing trend in the utilization of mixed-model assembly lines (MMALs). These lines, often adhering to the Just-In-Time production system, produce diversified products efficiently, maintaining least possible inventories. In this paper, the sequencing of an already balanced large scale double MMAL, manufacturing cars, is modeled as an integer mathematical programming problem and optimized over four objective functions. Two classical multiobjective methods are implemented to solve the mathematical integer programming problem, as well as a synergy of them. The former two are: the compensatory one, global criterion method, and the non-compensatory one, method of satisfactory goals, proposed by Benson. In addition, the model is solved using a combination of the aforementioned methods, as proposed by the authors, which is coupling certain characteristics from both. All three methods make use of the preferences, extracted from a real decision maker, responsible for the management of the production, who is enabled to choose the most preferred among the optimal solutions. Finally, the results, obtained from the implementation of the three separate methods, are assessed with regard to their effectiveness and efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bard JF, Shtub A, Joshi SB (1994) Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines to level parts usage and minimize line length. Int J Prod Res 32:2431–2454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouyssou D, Pirlot M (2005) A characterization of concordance relations. Eur J Oper Res 167(2):427–443

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boysen N, Fliender M, Scholl A (2009) Sequencing mixed-model assembly lines: survey, classification and model critique. Eur J Oper Res 192:349–373

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Branke J, Deb K, Miettinen K, Slowinski R (eds) (2008) Multiobjective optimization: interactive and evolutionary approaches of LNCS, vol 5467. Springer, Berlin

  • Chankong V, Haimes YY (1983) Multiobjective decision making: theory and methodology. Elsevier Science, New York, and Dover Publications, Incorporated, 2008

  • Ehrgott M, Gandibleux X (2002) Multiple criteria optimization: state of the art annotated bibliographic surveys, vol 52. Kluwer’s international series in operations research and management science, Boston

  • Ehrgott M, Gandibleux XA (2000) Survey and annotated bibliography of multiobjective combinatorial optimization. OR Spektrum 22:425–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GAMS Development Corporation (2010) General algebraic modeling system (GAMS), release 23.5.2. Washington, DC. http://www.gams.com. Accessed 31 Aug 2015

  • Hwang CL, Masud ASM (1979) Multiple objective decision making: methods and applications. Springer, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hyun CJ, Kim Y, Kim YK (1998) A genetic algorithm for multiple objective sequencing problems in mixed model assembly lines. Comput Oper Res 25:675–690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL (1980) Siting energy facilities. Academic Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Keeney RL, Raiffa H (1976) Decisions with multiple objectives: preferences and value tradeoffs. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Korkmazel T, Meral S (2001) Bicriteria sequencing methods for the mixed-model assembly line in just-in-time production systems. Eur J Oper Res 131:188–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makarouni I, Psarras J, Siskos E (2015) Interactive bicriterion decision support for a large scale industrial scheduling system. Ann Oper Res 227(1):45–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mavrotas G (2009) Effective implementation of the \(\epsilon \)-constraint method in multi-objective mathematical programming problems. Appl Math Comput 213:455–465

    Google Scholar 

  • McMullen PR (2001) An efficient frontier approach to addressing JIT sequencing problems with setups via search heuristics. Comput Ind Eng 41:335–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monden Y (1983) Toyota production system: a practical approach to production management. Industrial Engineering and Management Press, Georgia

    Google Scholar 

  • Rahimi-Vahed AR, Rabbani M, Tavakkoli-Moghaddam R, Torabi SA, Jolai F (2007) A multi-objective scatter search for a mixed-model assembly line sequencing problem. Adv Eng Inf 21:85–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roy B, Bouyssou D (1993) Aide Multicritère à la Décision : méthodes et Cas, Economica, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • T’kindt V, Billaut JC (2005) Multicriteria scheduling: theory, models and algorithms, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eleftherios Siskos.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Makarouni, I., Siskos, E. & Psarras, J. Multiobjective large scale job sequencing optimization based on a synergy of compensatory and non compensatory methods. Oper Res Int J 16, 223–244 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0195-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-015-0195-8

Keywords

Navigation