Skip to main content
Log in

The cross-efficiency in the optimistic–pessimistic framework

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Operational Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In spite of strong discrimination power, the cross-efficiency methods suffer from some drawbacks that may limit their usefulness. The possible existence of multiple optimal weights may lead to the non-uniqueness of cross-efficiency scores and rankings. Also, some of these methods evaluate decision making units (DMUs) according to an optimistic approach. In this approach, the strengths of DMUs are considered, whereas their weaknesses are ignored. To reflect the real performance of DMUs, both weaknesses and strengths of them must be considered. In this study, an optimistic–pessimistic approach is applied for presenting a new cross-efficiency method. In the proposed method, the estimated scores are based on both weaknesses and strengths of DMUs. Also, using the proposed models, the optimal weights are uniquely determined. So, the proposed method can fully rank DMUs without needing to any secondary goal. Finally, our method is illustrated using two examples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcaraz J, Ramón N, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2013) Ranking ranges in cross-efficiency evaluations. Eur J Oper Res 226:516–521

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charnes A, Cooper WW, Rhodes E (1978) Measuring the efficiency of DMUs. Eur J Oper Res 2:429–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle J, Green R (1994) Efficiency and cross-efficiency in DEA: derivations, meanings and uses. J Oper Res Soc 45(5):567–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodabakhshi M, Aryavash K (2012) Ranking all units in data envelopment analysis. Appl Math Lett 25:2066–2070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodabakhshi M, Aryavash K (2014a) The fair allocation of common fixed cost or revenue using DEA concept. Ann Oper Res 214(1):187–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodabakhshi M, Aryavash K (2014b) Ranking units with fuzzy data in DEA. Data Envel Anal Decis Sci 2014:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodabakhshi M, Aryavash K (2014c) The global Malmquist productivity index under the optimistic–pessimistic approach of DEA. Int J Oper Res 11(4):131–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodabakhshi M, Aryavash K (2015a) Aggregating preference rankings using an optimistic–pessimistic approach. Comput Ind Eng 85:13–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khodabakhshi M, Aryavash K (2015b) The optimistic–pessimistic ranking in the chance constrained DEA. Int J Oper Res 12:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Khodabakhshi M, Rezaee M, Aryavash K (2015) ABC classification using DEA: classification of Iranian universities from students welfare foundation view point. Int J Inf Decis Sci 7(4):358–365

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008a) The DEA game cross-efficiency mode and its Nash equilibrium. Oper Res 56(5):1278–1288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liang L, Wu J, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008b) Alternative secondary goals in DEA cross-efficiency evaluation. Int J Prod Econ 113:1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim S (2012) Minimax and maximin formulations of cross-efficiency in DEA. Comput Ind Eng 62:726–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramón N, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (2014) Dominance relations and ranking of units by using interval number ordering with cross-efficiency intervals. J Oper Res Soc 65:1336–1343

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sexton TR, Silkman RH, Hogan AJ (1986) Data envelopment analysis: critique and extensions. In: Silkman RH (ed) Measuring efficiency: an assessment of data envelopment analysis. Jossey-Bass, San Fransisco, pp 73–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Chin KS (2010) A neutral DEA model for cross-efficiency evaluation and its extension. Expert Syst Appl 37(5):3666–3675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YM, Chain KS, Jiang P (2011) Weight determination in the cross-efficiency evaluation. Comput Ind Eng 61:497–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu J, Sun J, Liang L (2012) Cross efficiency evaluation method based on weight-balanced data envelopment analysis model. Comput Ind Eng 63:513519

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Ang S, Xia Q, Yang C (2012) Ranking DMUs by using interval DEA cross efficiency matrix with acceptability analysis. Eur J Oper Res 223:483–488

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu J (1998) Data envelopment analysis vs. principal component analysis: an illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities. Eur J Oper Res 111(1):5061

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kourosh Aryavash.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Khodabakhshi, M., Aryavash, K. The cross-efficiency in the optimistic–pessimistic framework. Oper Res Int J 17, 619–632 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0243-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12351-016-0243-z

Keywords

Navigation