Skip to main content
Log in

Experimenting False Alarm Demand for Human Robot Interactions in Humanoid Soccer Robots

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Performance of robots in human robot teams has always been a topic of interest for many researchers in human robot interaction community. Traditionally adopted neglect tolerance model for performance measurements assume ideal conditions in which the operator switches control between robots sequentially based on acceptable performance level for each robot ignoring any false alarms due to erroneous interactions. In this paper, we present the false alarm demand, a new metric for measuring effects of false alarms on human robot team performance and extend the neglect tolerance model to situations in which false positives and false negatives are prevalent. Experiments were performed with real and virtual humanoid soccer robots across tele-operated, and point to point modes of autonomy. Measured false alarm demand and robot performances were largely consistent with the proposed extended neglect tolerance model predictions for real and virtual experiments for both autonomy modes. Experiments also showed that extended neglect tolerance model offered better estimation of robot performances as compared to the traditionally adopted neglect tolerance model for situations wherein false alarms are prevalent.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Metev SM, Veiko VP (2006) Task structure and user attributes as elements of human-robot interaction design. In: Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication

  2. Wang J, Wang H, Lewis L, Scerri P, Velagapudi P, Katia S (2008) Experiments in coordination demand for multirobot systems. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on distributed human-machine systems

  3. Goodrich MA, Schultz AC (2007) Human-robot interaction: a survey. In: Foundations and trends in human-computer interaction, pp 203–275

  4. Drury JL, Scholtz J, Yanco HA (2003) Awareness in human-robot interactions. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on systems, man and cybernetics

  5. Goodrich MA, Olsen DR (2003) Seven principles of efficient interaction. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics, pp 3943–3948

  6. Bartneck C, Kulic D, Croft E, Zoghbi S (2008) Measurement instruments for the anthropomorphism, animacy, likeability, perceived intelligence, and perceived safety of robots. Int J Soc Robot 1(1)

  7. Crandall JW, Goodrich MA (2002) Characterizing efficiency of human-robot interaction: a case study of shared-control teleoperation. In: Proceedings of IEEE/RSJ international conference on intelligent robots and systems

  8. Crandall JW, Goodrich MA (2001) Experiments in adjustable autonomy. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics

  9. Dufourd D, Dalgalarrondo A (2006) Integrating human/robot interaction into robot control architectures for defense application. In: Proceedings of first national workshop on control architectures for robots

  10. Stein M (1994) Behavior-based control for time-delayed teleoperation. Dissertation, University of Pennsylvania

  11. Kheddar A, Atlani D, Iles A, Blazevic P (1996) New trends in legged robots teleoperation. In: Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication

  12. Rofer T, Lankenau A (1999) Ensuring safe obstacle avoidance in a shared-control system. In: Proceedings of seventh international conference on emergent technologies and factory automation

  13. Ong KW, Seet G, Sim SK (2008) An implementation of seamless human-robot interaction for telerobotics. Int J Adv Robot Syst 5(2)

  14. Paul M, Peter A (1994) Shared autonomy in a robot hand teleoperation system. In: Proceedings of the international conference on intelligent robotics systems

  15. Crandall JW, Goodrich MA, Olsen DR, Nielsen CW (2005) Validating human-robot interaction schemes in multi-tasking environments. IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern Part A 35(4):438–449

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Goodrich MA, Crandall JW, Stimpson JL (2003) Neglect tolerant teaming: issues and dilemmas. In: Proceedings of the AAAI spring symposium on human interaction with autonomous systems in complex environments

  17. Crandall JW, Cummings ML (2007) Identifying predictive metrics for supervisory control of multiple robots. IEEE Trans Robot 23(5)

  18. Crandall JW, Nielsen CW, Goodrich MA (2003) Towards predicting robot team performance. In: 2003 IEEE international conference on systems, man, and cybernetics

  19. Goodrich MA, Crandall JW, Stimpson JR (2003) Neglect tolerant teaming: issues and dilemmas. In: Proceedings of AAAI spring symposium on human interaction with autonomous systems in complex environments

  20. Steinfeld, Fong T, Kaber D, Lewis M, Scholtz J, Schultz A, Goodrich M (2006) Common metrics for human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the human-robot interaction conference

  21. Olsen DR, Wood SB (2004) Fan-out: measuring human control of multiple robots. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI conference on Human factors in computing systems

  22. Zhou C, Yue PK (2004) Robo-Erectus: a low cost autonomous humanoid soccer robot. Adv Robot 18(7):717–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mohan RE, Acosta Calderon CA, Zhou C, Yue PK, Hu L (2008) Modelling human-humanoid robot interaction in soccer robotics domain using NGOMSL. In: Proceedings of 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication

  24. Mohan RE, Acosta Calderon CA, Zhou C, Yue PK, Hu L, Iniya B (2008) An embedded vision system for soccer playing humanoid robot: Robo-Erectus Junior. In: Proceedings of IEEE international conference on signal processing, communications and networking

  25. Acosta Calderon CA, Mohan RE, Zhou C, Yue PK, Hu L (2007) Integration of robust embedded vision and control for a soccer playing humanoid robot. In: The 4th international conference on computational intelligence, robotics and autonomous systems, Palmerston North, New Zealand

  26. Acosta Calderon CA, Zhou C, Yue PK, Wong M, Mohan RE (2007) Robo-Erectus Junior: a kid size soccer-playing humanoid robot. In: RoboCup 2007 team description paper in symposium

  27. Acosta Calderon CA, Zhou C, Yue PK, Wong M, Mohan RE (2007) A distributed embedded control architecture for humanoid soccer robots. In: Proceedings of International conference on climbing and walking robots and the supporting technologies for mobile machines, pp 487–496

  28. Acosta Calderon CA, Mohan RE, Zhou C (2007) A humanoid robotic simulator with application to robocup. In: Proceedings of IEEE Latin America robotic simposium/congreso mexicano de robotica (LARS), Mexico

  29. Smith R (2008) Open dynamics engine. http://www.ode.org

  30. Crandall JW (2003) Towards developing effective human-robot systems. MS thesis, Brigham Young University

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mohan Rajesh Elara.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Elara, M.R., Wijesoma, W.S., Acosta Calderon, C.A. et al. Experimenting False Alarm Demand for Human Robot Interactions in Humanoid Soccer Robots. Int J of Soc Robotics 1, 171–180 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0017-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0017-3

Keywords

Navigation