Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The ethical aspects of robotics have recently gained sufficient importance to be debated in international forums and to be endowed with their own collective nametag—roboethics. Almost all of the discussion within the roboethics community and elsewhere has thus far centred on questions of the form: “Is it ethical to develop and use robots for such-and-such a purpose?”, questions based upon doubts about the effect that a particular type of robot is likely to have, both on society in general and on those with whom the robots will interact in particular. What has usually been missing from the debate is the complementary question: “Is it ethical to treat robots in such-and-such a way?” Here we attempt to redress the balance, having first reviewed some of the relevant literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aleksander I (1995) Artificial neuroconsciousness: an update. IWANN, available at http://www.ee.ic.ac.uk/research/neural/publications.iwann.html

  2. Arkin R (2007) Lethality and autonomous robots: an ethical stance. In: ICRA ’07: IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, Rome

  3. Billings L (2007) Rise of roboethics. Grappling with the implications of an artificially intelligent culture. Available at www.seedmagazine.com/news/2007/07/rise_of_roboethics.php?

  4. Calverley D (2005) Toward a method for determining the legal status of a conscious machine. In: Chrisley R, Clowes R, Torrance S (eds) Proceedings of the AISB 2005 symposium on next generation approaches to machine consciousness: imagination, development, intersubjectivity, and embodiment. University of Hertfordshire

  5. Calverley D (2005) Android science and the animal rights movement: are there analogies? In: Cognitive sciences society workshop, Stresa, Italy, pp 127–136

  6. CBC (2007) Ethical code for robots in works, South Korea says. Available at www.cbc.ca/technology/story/2007/03/07/tech-robot-ethics.html

  7. Chella A, Manzotti R (2007) Artificial consciousness. Imprint Academic, Exter

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clark R, Squire L (1998) Classical conditioning and brain systems: the role of awareness. Science 280(3):77–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Clark R, Squire L (1999) Human eyeblink classical conditioning: effects of manipulating awareness of the stimulus contingencies. Psychol Sci 10:14–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Clowes R, Torrance S, Chrsley R (2007) Machine consciousness: embodiment and imagination. J Conscious Stud 14(7). Special issue

  11. De Quincey C (2006) Switched-on consciousness: clarifying what it means. J Conscious Stud 13(4):7–12

    Google Scholar 

  12. Economist (2007) Robot wars. The Economist, April 17th 2007. Available at http://www.economist.com/science/tq/displaystory.cfm?story_id=9028041

  13. Freitas R Jr (1985) The legal rights of robots. Stud Lawyer 13:54–56. A later draft is available at http://www.freitas.com/Astro/LegalRightsOfRobots.html

    Google Scholar 

  14. Freud S (1933) New introductory lectures on psychoanalysis. Internationaler Psychoanalytischer, Leipzig

    Google Scholar 

  15. Gallup G (1977) Self-recognition in primates: a comparative approach to the bidirectional properties of consciousness. Am Psychol 329–338

  16. Holland O (ed) (2003) Machine consciousness. Imprint Academic, Exeter

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kant I (1996) In: Heath P, Schneewind J (eds) Lectures on ethics. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  18. Koch C (2004) The quest for consciousness: a neurobiological approach. Roberts and Company, Englewood

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lehman-Wilzig S (1981) Frankenstein unbound: towards a legal definition of artificial intelligence. Futures 442–457, December

  20. Levy D (2006) Robots unlimited. AK Peters, Wellesley

    Google Scholar 

  21. Levy D (2007) Intimate relationships with artificial partners. Ph.D. Dissertation, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands

  22. Levy D (2007) Love and sex with robots. Harper Collins, New York

    Google Scholar 

  23. Owen J, Osley R (2007) Bill of rights for abused robots: experts draw up an ethical charter to prevent humans exploiting machines. The Independent, April 1st

  24. Pinker S (1997) Could a computer ever be conscious? Available at http://pinker.wjh.harvard.edu/articles/media/1997_08_18_usnewsworldreport.html

  25. Ramey C (2005) ‘For the sake of others’: the ‘personal ethics’ of human-android interaction. In: Proceedings of COGSCI workshop: toward social mechanisms of android science. Stresa, Italy, July 25–26, pp 137–148

  26. Sloman A (1996) A systematic approach to consciousness. (How to avoid talking nonsense?) Summary of a lecture presented by Aaron Sloman at the Royal Society of Arts, 26 February 1996. Available at http://www.cs.bham.ac.uk/~axs/misc/consciousness.rsa.text

  27. Solum L (1992) Legal personhood for artificial intelligences. North Carol Law Rev 70:1231–1287

    Google Scholar 

  28. Sparrow R, Sparrow L (2006) In the hands of machines? The future of aged care. Minds Mach 16(2):141–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Stone C (1972) Should trees have standing? Toward legal rights for natural objects. South Calif Law Rev 45:450–457

    Google Scholar 

  30. Stone C (1997) ‘Should trees have standing?’ and other essays on law, morals and the environment. Kaufmann, Los Altos

    Google Scholar 

  31. Takeno J, Inaba K, Suzuki T (2005) Experiments and examination of mirror image cognition using a small robot. In: The 6th IEEE international symposium on computational intelligence in robotics and automation (CIRA 2005), pp 493–498. Available at http://ieeeexplore.ieee.org/xpl/freeabs_all.jsp?arnumber=1554325

  32. Torrance S (2004) Could we, should we, create conscious robots? J Health Soc Econ Issues 4(2):43–46

    Google Scholar 

  33. Torrance S (2008) Ethics and consciousness in artificial agents. Artif Intell Soc 22(4)

  34. Turing A (1950) Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind Q Rev Psychol Philos LIX(236):433–460

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  35. Veruggio G (2006) EURON roboethics roadmap. Genoa, Scuola di Robotica. Available at http://www.roboethics.org/site/modules/tinycontent/index.php?id=14

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Intelligent Toys Ltd., London, UK

    David Levy

Authors
  1. David Levy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David Levy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levy, D. The Ethical Treatment of Artificially Conscious Robots. Int J of Soc Robotics 1, 209–216 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0022-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-009-0022-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation