Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

This Robot is Sociable: Close-up on the Gestures and Measured Motion of a Human Responding to a Proactive Robot

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

During an unannounced encounter, we study the appreciation of the robot’s sociable character (measured via the answers to a questionnaire) and the motion (arm and head movement frequency and smoothness using IMU sensors) of two humans interacting with a proactive humanoid, knowing that the experiment involves twenty pairs of participants. We also investigate the dependencies between the participants’ response to the robot’s non-verbal actions and their perception of its sociability. Our results show that the more the humans find the robot sociable, the more they tend to respond to its engaging gestures and the higher is the frequency of their arm motion and the smoothness of their head motion when interacting with it. Therefore, these results show that measurable physical movements might be significant indicators to investigate a social robot’s sociable character from the human partner’s point of view, as well as to possibly infer the human tendency to interact with it. More generally, the sociable trait attributed to an assistive robot operating in a public or in a private environment, seems to be one of the keys to the success of human-robot interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

IMU:

Inertial measurement units

HRI  :

Human-robot interaction

References

  1. Kim A, Han J, Jung Y, Lee K (2013) The effects of familiarity and robot gesture on user acceptance of information. In: 8th ACM/IEEE Int conf on human-robot interaction, 159–160

  2. Salem M, Eyssel F, Rohlfing K, Kopp S, Joublin F (2013) To err is human(-like): effects of robot gesture on perceived anthropomorphism and likability. Int J Soc Robot 5(3):313–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sabelli AM, Kanta T, Hagita N (2011) A conversational robot in an elderly care center, an ethnographic study. In: Int conf on human-robot interaction, 37–44

  4. Gillespie DL, Leffler A (1983) Theories of non-verbal behavior: a critical review of proxemics research. Sociol Theory 1:120–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Firth R (1972) Verbal and bodily rituals of greeting and parting. The interpretation of ritual. Tavistock, London, pp 1–38

    Google Scholar 

  6. Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Imai M, Ono T (2004) Development and evaluation of interactive humanoid robots. Proc IEEE 92(11):1839–1850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Castellano G, Villaba S, Camurri A (2007) Recognising human emotions from body movement and gesture dynamics. In: Proceedings of the affective computing and intelligent interaction, 2nd international conference, ACII 2007. Springer-Verlag, Lisbon, Berlin, 71–82

  8. Dael N, Goudbeek M, Scherer KR (2013) Perceived gesture dynamics in nonverbal expression of motion. Perception 42:642–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harrigan JA (2005) Proxemics, kinesics, and gaze. In: Harrigan JR, Rosenthal R, Scherer KR (eds) The new handbook of methods in nonverbal behavior research. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp 137–198

    Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang R, Wang SH, Chen X, Yin D, Chen SH, Cheng M et al. (2011) Towards robot incremental learning constraints from comparative demonstration. In: Proceedings of 10th international conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS 2011), 1301–1302

  11. Scherer KR, Wallbott HG (1990) Ausdruck von emotionen. In: Scherer KR (ed) Enzyklopädie der Psychologie/Band Emotion. Hogrefe, Gottingen, pp 345–422

    Google Scholar 

  12. McColl D, Nejat G (2013) Recognizing emotional body language displayed by a human-like social robot. Int J Soc Robot 5(2):171–191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wallbott HG (1998) Bodily expression of emotion. Eur J Soc Psychol 28:879–896

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Boone RT, Cunningham JG (1998) Children’s decoding of emotion in expressive body movement: the development of cue attunement. Dev Psychol 34:1007–1016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Baddoura R, Matuskata R, Venture G (2012) The familiar as a key-concept in regulating the social and affective dimensions of HRI. In: Proceedings of the IEEE/RAS international conference on humanoid robots, 234–241

  16. Kanda T, Ishiguro H, Imai M, Ono T (2003) Body movement analysis of human-robot interaction. In: Proceedings of the 18th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, 177–182

  17. Baddoura R, Venture G (2013) Social versus useful HRI: experiencing the familiar, perceiving the robot as a sociable partner and responding to its actions. Int J Soc Robot 5(4):529–547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Rohrer B, Fasoli S, Krebs H, Hughes R, Volpe B, Frontera W, Stein J, Hogan N (2002) Movement smoothness changes during stroke recovery. J Neurosci 22(18):8297–8304

    Google Scholar 

  19. Powers A, Kiesler S (2006) The advisor robot: Tracing people’s mental model from a robot’s physical attributes. In: Proceedings of the conference on human-robot interaction, 218–225

  20. Eyssel F, Hegel F, Horstman G, Wagner C (2010) Anthropomorphic inferences from emotional nonverbal cues: a case study. In: Proceedings IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, 681–686

  21. Sabanovic S, Michalowski MP, Simmons Reid (2006) Robots in the wild: observing human-robot social interaction outside the lab. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international workshop on advanced motion control, 596–601

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support provided by the ”Women’s Future Development Organization”, Japan.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Télécom Ecole de Management - Institut Mines-Télécom, Evry, France

    Ritta Baddoura

  2. Tokyo University of Agriculture and Technology, Tokyo, Japan

    Gentiane Venture

Authors
  1. Ritta Baddoura
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Gentiane Venture
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ritta Baddoura.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Baddoura, R., Venture, G. This Robot is Sociable: Close-up on the Gestures and Measured Motion of a Human Responding to a Proactive Robot. Int J of Soc Robotics 7, 489–496 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0279-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0279-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation