Abstract
The aim of this paper is to investigate on children’s knowledge and imaginary about robots. To do so, we administered to 704 children from 17 classes of 8 elementary and secondary schools, a survey with close and open questions about their conceptualization of robots. To carry out this study we took as point of reference the theoretical framework of social representations. The main results are that children evaluate toys, robots and human-beings as significantly different on all the characteristics considered. More than toys, robots have mechanical movements, they move, are more intelligent than toys but they do not keep company to them. By contrast, human beings are perceived by children starting from their corporeity: they eat and sleep, move by themselves, are intelligent and speak, keep eye-contact and company. However, children complain about the fact that human beings do not play with them. The imaginary about robots that children receive from media is characterized by anthropomorphic shapes, bodies and by human-like cognitions, feelings and behavior. The more examples of visual products with robots children are able to evoke, the higher they evaluate robots on all human-like characteristics (e.g. it looks into my eyes). Hence, the tension between imaginary and knowledge can be confounding because the human-like features of fictional robots are more advanced than those reachable by the factual ones.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Batel S, Castro P (2009) A social representations approach to the communication between different spheres: an analysis of the impacts of two discursive formats. J Theory Soc Behav 39(4):415–433
Bauer MW, Gaskell G (1999) Towards a paradigm for research on social representations. J Theory Soc Behav 29(2):163–186. doi:10.1111/1468-5914.00096
Bicchi A, Tamburrini G (2015) Social robotics and societies of robots. Inf Soc 31(3):237–243
Cavallo F, Limosani R, Manzi A, Bonaccorsi M, Esposito R, Rocco MD, Pecora F, Teti G, Saffiotti A, Dario P (2014) Development of a socially believable multi-robot solution from town to home. Cogn Comput 6(4):954–967. doi:10.1007/s12559-014-9290-z
De Rosa AS, Farr R (2001) Icon and symbol: two sides of the same coin in the investigation of social representations. In: Buschini F, Kanampalikis N (eds) Penser la vie, le social, la nature. Meélanges en hommage à Serge Moscovici, Les Editions de la Maison des Sciences de lŠHomme, Paris, pp 237–256
Durkheim É (1924) Sociologie et Philosophie, Librairie Félix Alcan, Paris, chap Représentations individuelles et représentations collectives. Bibliothèque de philosophie contemporaine
Duveen G (1993) The development of social representations of gender. Papers Soc Represent 2(3):1–7
Enz S, Diruf M, Spielhagen C, Zoll C, Vargas PA (2011) The social role of robots in the future—explorative measurement of hopes and fears. Int J Soc Robot 3(3):263–271. doi:10.1007/s12369-011-0094-y
Eurobarometer (2012) Public attitudes towards robots. Special Eurobarometer 382. European Commission, http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/archives/ebs/ebs_382_en.pdf. Accessed March 1, 2015
Field A (2009) Discovering statistics using SPSS. SAGE Publications, London
Fortunati L (1995) I mostri nell’immaginario. Franco Angeli, Milano
Fortunati L (2013) Afterword: robot conceptualizations between continuity and innovation. Intervalla: Platform Intellect Exch 1:116–119
Fortunati L, Contarello A (2002) Internet mobile convergence: via similarity or complementarity? Trends Commun 9:81–98
Fortunati L, Manganelli AM (2008) The social representation of telecommunications. Pers Ubiquitous Comput 12(6):421–431
Fortunati L, Esposito A, Ferrin G, Viel M (2014) Approaching social robots through playfulness and doing-it-yourself: children in action. Cogn Comput 6(4):789–801. doi:10.1007/S12559-014-9303-y
Fortunati L, Esposito A, Lugano G (2015) Introduction to the special issue beyond industrial robotics: social robots entering public and domestic spheres. Inf Soc 31(3):229–236
Frennert S, Östlund B (2014) Review: seven matters of concern of social robots and older people. Int J Soc Robot 6(2):299–310
Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315(5812):619. doi:10.1126/science.1134475
Höflich J, El Bayed A (2015) Perception and acceptance of social robots—an exploratory study. In: Vincent J, Taipale S, Sapio B, Fortunati L, Lugano G (eds) Social robots from a human perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 39–54
Howarth C (2006) A social representation is not a quiet thing: exploring the critical potential of social representations theory. Br J Soc Psychol 45(Pt 1):65–86
Jodelet D (1984) Représentations sociales: phénomènes, concepts et théorie. In: Moscovici S (ed) Psychologie sociale. PUF, Paris, pp 357–378
Jodelet D (1989) Les reprèsentations sociales. PUF, Paris
Joffe H (1998) Social representations and the aids field. Psychol Soc 24:21–39
Jovchelovitch S (2002) Re-thinking the diversity of knowledge: cognitive polyphasia, belief and representation. Psychologie et société 5(1):121–138
Moscovici S (1961) La psychanalyse, son image et son public. PUF, Paris
Moscovici S (1973) Foreword. In: Herzlich C (ed) Health and illness: a social psychological analysis. Academic Press, London
Moscovici S (1981) On social representations. In: Forgas JP (ed) Social cognition. Academic Press, London, pp 181–224
Moscovici S (1984) The phenomenon of social representations. In: Farr R, Moscovici S (eds) Social representations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–69
Šabanović S (2010) Robots in society. Society in robots. Int J Soc Robot 2(4):439–450
Sensales G (1990) L’informatica nella stampa italiana: le comunicazioni di massa nel processo psico-sociale delle rappresentazioni. Franco Angeli, Milano
Stafford RQ, MacDonald BA, Jayawardena C, Wegner DM, Broadbent E (2014) Does the robot have a mind? Mind perception and attitudes towards robots predict use of an eldercare robot. Int J Soc Robot 6(1):17–32
Sugiyama S, Vincent J (eds) (2013) Social robots and emotion: transcending the boundary between humans and ICTs—Special issue, Intervalla: platform for intellectual exchange, vol 1
Sverre Syrdal D, Dautenhahn K, Ching Ho W, Koay KL (2015) Long-term human-robot interaction using task- and scenario-based prototyping. Inf Soc 31(3):265–283
Taipale S, de Luca F, Sarrica M, Fortunati L (2015) Robot shift from industrial production to social reproduction. In: Vincent J, Taipale S, Sapio B, Fortunati L, Lugano G (eds) Social robots from a human perspective. Springer, Berlin, pp 11–24
Turkle S (2012) Alone together: why we expect more from technology and less from each other. Basic Books, New York
Vergés P (1991) Représentations des technologies nouvelles et détermination idéologique. In: Aebischer V, Deconchy J, Lipiansky R (eds) Idéologies et représentations sociales. De Val, Fribourg, pp 159–174
Wagner W, Duveen G, Farr R, Jovchelovitch S, Lorenzi-Cioldi F, Markova I, Rose D (1999) Theory and method of social representations. Asian J Soc Psychol 2:95–125
Weiss A, Igelsböck J, Wurhofer D, Tscheligi M (2011) Looking forward to a “Robotic Society”? Int J Soc Robot 3(2):111–123. doi:10.1007/s12369-010-0076-5
Złotowski J, Proudfoot D, Yogeeswaran K, Bartneck C (2014) Anthropomorphism: opportunities and challenges in human–robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot pp 1–14
Złotowski JA, Sumioka H, Nishio S, Glas DF, Bartneck C, Ishiguro H (2015) Persistence of the uncanny valley: the influence of repeated interactions and a robot’s attitude on its perception. Front Psychol 6:883
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Fortunati, L., Esposito, A., Sarrica, M. et al. Children’s Knowledge and Imaginary About Robots. Int J of Soc Robotics 7, 685–695 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0316-9
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0316-9