Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Perceived Comfortableness of Anthropomorphized Robots in U.S. and Japan

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study focuses on cultural differences in perceptions of comfortableness with robots that have either positive or negative anthropomorphic features. To clarify the effect of the valence of anthropomorphic features in addition to the effect of the number of features in different countries, this study investigated how Americans and Japanese perceive comfortableness with a positively or negatively featured robot. A total of 360 respondents (180 Americans and 180 Japanese) read a cover story about one robot. In the story, the valence and numbers of anthropomorphic features of the robot were manipulated and the respondents completed the comfortableness measurements including Comfort, Controllability and so on. The results demonstrated that Americans perceived more Comfort, Controllability, and Performance than did the Japanese respondents. The Americans show different levels of comfortableness perceptions in response to large number of features, and the Japanese respondents showed different levels of comfortableness in response to small number of features. We discuss the cultural background for the different patterns of perceived comfortableness between U.S. and Japan.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banks MR, Willoughby LM, Banks WA (2008) Animal-assisted therapy and loneliness in nursing homes: use of robotic versus living dogs. J Am Med Dir Assoc 9:173–177

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bartneck C, Nomura T, Kanda T, Suzuki T, Kato K (2005) A cross-cultural study on attitude towards robots. In: The proceedings of the 11th international conference on human–computer interaction, pp 217–230

  3. Bartneck C (2008) Who like androids more: Japanese or US Americans? In: The proceedings of the 17th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication, RO-MAN 2008, Munchen, pp 553–557

  4. Bemelmans R, Gelderblom GJ, Jonker P, de Witte L (2012) Socially assistive robots in elderly care: a systematic review into effects and effectiveness. J Am Med Dir Assoc 13:114–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chang WL, Šabanovi (2015) Interaction expands function: social shaping of the therapeutic robot PARO in a nursing home. In: Proceedings of the 10th international conference on human–robot interaction (HRI’15), Portland, OR, pp 343–350

  6. Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT (2007) On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev 114:864–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Eyssel F, Kuchenbrandt D, Hegel F, de Ruiter L(2012) Activating elicited agent knowledge: How robot and user features shape the perception of social robots. In: Proceedings of the 21th IEEE international symposium in robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN 2012), pp 851–857

  8. Eyssel F, Reich N (2013) Loneliness makes my heart grow fonder (of robots)? On the effects of loneliness on psychological anthropomorphism. In: Proceedings of the 8th ACM/IEEE conference on human–robot interaction (HRI 2013), pp 121–122

  9. Gray HM, Gray K, Wegner DM (2007) Dimensions of mind perception. Science 315:619

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gray K, Knobe J, Sheskin M, Bloom P, Barrett LF (2011) More than a body: mind perception and the surprising nature of objectification. J Personal Soc Psychol 101:1207–1220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haslam N (2006) Dehumanization: an integrative review. Personal Soc Psychol Rev 10:252–264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamide H, Kawabe K, Shigemi S, Arai T (2015) Anshin as a concept of subjective well-being between humans and robots in Japan. Adv Robot 29:1–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kamide H, Kawabe K, Shigemi S, Arai T (2014) Relationship between familiarity and humanness of robots-quantification of psychological impressions toward humanoid robots. Adv Robot 28(12):821–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kamide H, Eyssel F, Arai T (2013) Psychological anthropomorphism in robots. In: The proceedings of the international conference on social robotic, Bristol, UK, pp 198–208

  15. Lay S, Brace N, Pike G (2016) Circling around the uncanny valley: design principles for research into the relation between human likeness and eeriness. i-Perception 6(7):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  16. Mori M (1970) The uncanny valley. Energy 7:33–35

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rosenthal-von der Pütten AM, Krämer NC (2015) Individuals’ evaluations of and attitudes towards potentially uncanny robots. Int J Soc Robot 7(5):799–824

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Scholl BJ, Tremoulet PD (2000) Perceptual causality and animacy. Trends Cognit Sci 4:200–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shibata T, Wada K, Tanie K (2004) Tabulation and analysis of questionnaire results of subjective evaluation of seal robot in Japan, U.K., Sweden and Italy. In: The Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on robotics and automation, New Orleans, pp 1387–1392

  20. Shibata T, Wada K, Ikeda Y, Šabanovi S (2009) Cross-cultural studies on subjective evaluation of seal robot. Adv Robot 23:443–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Waytz A, Cacioppo J, Epley N (2010) Who sees human? The stability and importance of individual differences in anthropomorphism. Perspect Psychol Sci 5:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Złotowski J, Proudfoot D, Yogeeswaran K, Yogeeswaran K, Bartneck C (2015) Anthropomorphism: opportunities and challenges in human–robot interaction. Int J Soc Robot 7(3):347–360

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by JSPS KAKENHI Grant Number 15K13114, 15K01582, 26705008, and 16H03723. This work was also supported in part by the EU-Japan coordinated R&D project on “Culture Aware Robots and Environmental Sensor System for Elderly Support” commissioned by the Ministry of Internal Affairs and Communications of Japan and EC Horizon 2020.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Innovation for Future Society, Nagoya University, Furo-cho, Chikusa-ku, Nagoya, Aichi, 464-8601, Japan

    Hiroko Kamide

  2. Graduate School of Engineering Science, Osaka University, 1-3 Machikaneyamacho, Toyonaka, Osaka, 560-8531, Japan

    Tatsuo Arai

Authors
  1. Hiroko Kamide
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tatsuo Arai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hiroko Kamide.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kamide, H., Arai, T. Perceived Comfortableness of Anthropomorphized Robots in U.S. and Japan. Int J of Soc Robotics 9, 537–543 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0409-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-017-0409-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation