Skip to main content
Log in

Variability of commuters’ bus line choice: an analysis of oyster card data

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A hyperpath can be defined as a set of attractive lines identified by the passenger, each of which might be the optimal one from the current stop, depending on lines’ arrival time, frequency, cost etc. This concept can lead to complex route choice and has been a fundamental assumption in most transit assignment models, despite few evidence whether passengers’ indeed select such complex strategies. This research uses time series smart card data from London to investigate flexibility in buses chosen by morning commuters. The analysis is based on n-step Markov models and proposes that the variations in bus lines taken by passengers who supposedly travel between the same OD pair every morning over several days should reflect the set of paths included in an (optimal) hyperpath. Our hypothesis is that a large variation in bus lines over days indicates a complex hyperpath whereas a passenger who takes the same line every morning does not consider many alternatives. Our results suggest that there is indeed significant variation in bus lines chosen, possibly in accordance with the theory of hyperpaths in networks with uncertainty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agard B, Morency C, Trépanier M (2006) Mining public transport user behaviour from smart card data. In: 12th IFAC symposium on information control problems in manufacturing—INCOM 2006, Saint-Etienne, France, May 1410919

    Google Scholar 

  • Agard B, Morency C, Trépanier M (2008) Mining smart card data from an urban transit network. In: Wang J (ed) Encyclopedia of data warehouse and mining

    Google Scholar 

  • Andreasson I (1976) A method for the analysis of transit networks. In: Roubens M (ed) Proceedings of the 2nd European congress on operations research. North Holland, Amsterdam, pp 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapleau R, Trépanier M, Chu KK (2008) The ultimate survey for transit planning: complete information with smart card data and GIS. Paper presented at 8th international conference on survey in transport, Lacd’Annecy, France

  • De Cea J, Fernández E (1993) Transit assignment for congested public transport system: an equilibrium model. Transp Sci 27(2):133–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fearnside K, Draper DP (1971) Public transport assignment—a new approach. Traffic Eng Control 13(7):298–299

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian M (1977) Traffic equilibrium model of traffic by car and public transit modes. Transp Res 10:166–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Florian M, Spiess H (1983) On two mode choice/assignment models. Transp Sci 17:32–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kato H, Kaneko Y, Inoue M (2010) Comparative analysis of transit assignment: evidence from urban railway system in the Tokyo metropolitan area. Transp J 37(5):775–799

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim JY, Kurauchi F, Uno N, Hagihara T, Daito T (2013) Using electronic toll collection data to understand traffic demand. J Intell Transp Syst. doi:10.1080/15472450.2013.806858 published online, 29 May 2013

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurauchi F, Bewll MGH, Schmöcker J-D (2003) Capacity constraint transit assignment with common lines. J Math Model Algorithms 2(4):309–327

    Google Scholar 

  • Kurauchi F, Schmöcker J-D, Fonzone A, Hassan MS, Shimamoto H, Bell MGH (2012) Estimation of weights of times and transfers for hyperpath travellers. Transp Res Rec. J Transp Res Board, 2284, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC 89–99. doi:10.3141/2284-11, 2012.10

  • Kusakabe T, Iryo T, Asakura Y (2010) Estimation method for railway passengers’ train choice behaviour with smart card transaction data. Transp J 37(5):731–740

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Lin Y, Zhao X, Song H, Zou N (2011) Estimating a transit passenger trip origin-destination matrix using automatic fare collection system. In: Xu J, Yu G, Zhou S, Unland R (eds) Database systems for advanced applications. Lecture notes in computer science, vol 6637. Springer, Berlin, pp 502–513

    Google Scholar 

  • Mandl CE (1979) Evaluation and optimization of urban public transportation networks. Presented at the 3rd European congress on operations research, Amsterdam, Netherlands

  • Morency C, Trépanier M, Agard B (2006) Analyzing the variability of transit users behaviour with smart card data. In: The 9th international IEEE conference on intelligent transportation systems—ITSC, Toronto, Canada, 17–20 September 2006, pp 8–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Morency C, Trépanier M, Agard B (2007) Measuring transit use variability with smart-card data. Transp Policy 14(3):193–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen S, Pallottino S (1988) Equilibrium traffic assignment for large scale transit networks. Eur J Oper Res 37(2):176–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen S, Pallottino S, Gendreau M (1998) Implicit enumeration of hyperpaths in a logit model for transit networks. Transp Sci 32(1):54–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nishiuchi H, Kuwahara M, Miska M, Warita H (2010) OD volume variation and its prediction based on urban expressway ETC-OD data. In: Proceedings of the 12th world conference on transport research, p 2095, 2010.7

    Google Scholar 

  • Nökel K, Wekeck S (2009) Boarding and alighting in frequency-based transit assignment. Paper presented at 88th annual transportation research board meeting, Washington DC

  • Park JY, Kim DJ, Lim YT (2008) Use of smart card data to define public transit use in Seoul, South Korea. Transp Res Rec. J Transp Res Board, No. 2063, Transportation Research Board of the National Academies, Washington, DC, pp 3–9. doi:10.3141/2063-01

  • Pelletier M, Trepanier M, Morency C (2011) Smart card data use in public transit: a literature review. Transp Res, Part C, Emerg Technol 19:557–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmöcker JD, Shimamto H, Kurauchi F (2013) Generation and calibration of transit hyperpaths. Proc Soc Behav Sci 80(7):211–230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spiess H, Florian M (1989) Optimal strategies: a new assignment model for transit networks. Transp Res 23B(2):83–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trépanier M, Tranchant N, Chapleau R (2007) Individual trip destination estimation in a transit smart card automated fare collection system. J Intell Transp Syst 11(1):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Hurk E, Kroon LG, Maróti G, Vervest P (2012) Dynamic forecast model of time dependent passenger flows for disruption management. Paper presented at 12th conference on advanced systems for public transport in Santiago, Santiago, Chile, 23–27 July 2012

  • Wardman M (2004) Public transport values of time. Transp Policy 11:363–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamazaki H, Uno N, Kurauchi F (2012) The effect of a new intercity expressway based on travel time reliability using electronic toll collection data. IET Intell Transp Syst 6(3):306–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang F, Liu H (2007) A new modeling framework for traveller’s day-to-day route adjustment processes. In: Allsop RE, Bell MGH, Heydecker BG (eds) Transportation and traffic theory. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 813–837

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research is funded by Grant-in-Aid for Challenging Exploratory Research, No. 2365312, (2011–2012) from The Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology of Japan. This research has been carried out in collaboration with the DynCapCon project headed by Prof. Michael G.H. Bell during his time at Imperial College London and Dr. Achille Fonzone (Edinburgh Napier University). We would like to thank Transport for London who kindly provided us with the Oyster card data.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Fumitaka Kurauchi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kurauchi, F., Schmöcker, JD., Shimamoto, H. et al. Variability of commuters’ bus line choice: an analysis of oyster card data. Public Transp 6, 21–34 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-013-0080-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-013-0080-x

Keywords

Navigation