Abstract
This research presents a bus fleet replacement optimization model to analyze vehicle replacement decisions when there are competing technologies. The focus of the paper is on sensitivity analysis. Model properties that are useful for sensitivity analysis are derived and applied utilizing real-world data from King County (Seattle) transit agency. Two distinct technologies, diesel hybrid and conventional diesel vehicles, are studied. Key variables affecting optimal bus type and replacement age are analyzed. Breakeven values and elasticity values are estimated. Results indicate that a government purchase cost subsidy has the highest impact on optimal replacement periods and total net cost. Maintenance costs affect the optimal replacement age but are unlikely to change the optimal vehicle type. Greenhouse gas emissions costs are not significant and affect neither bus type nor replacement age.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bean JC, Lohmann JR, Smith RL (1984) A dynamic infinite horizon replacement economy decision model. Eng Econ 30(2):99–120
Bean JC, Lohmann JR, Smith RL (1994) Equipment replacement under technological change. Nav Res Logist (NRL) 41(1):117–128
Bellman R (1955) Equipment replacement policy. J Soc Ind Appl Math 3(3):133–136
Boudart J, Figliozzi M (2012) Key variables affecting decisions of bus replacement age and total costs. Transp Res Rec 2274:109–113
Chandler K, Walkowicz K (2006) King county metro transit hybrid articulated buses: Final evaluation results. Technical report. National renewable energy laboratory
Fan W, Machemehl R, Gemar M, Brown L (2012) A stochastic dynamic programming approach for the equipment replacement optimization with probabilistic vehicle utilization. Paper presented at the transportation research board 91st annual meeting, Washington, DC
Feng W, Figliozzi M (2013) An economic and technological analysis of the key factors affecting the competitiveness of electric commercial vehicles: a case study from the USA market. Transp Res Part C 26:135–145
Figliozzi Miguel, Boudart Jesse, Feng Wei (2011) Economic and environmental optimization of vehicle fleets: impact of policy, market, utilization, and technological factors. J Transp Res Rec 2252:1–6
Hartman J (1999) A general procedure for incorporating asset utilization decisions into replacement analysis. Eng Econ 44(3):217–238
Hartman J (2000) The parallel replacement problem with demand and capital budgeting constraints. Nav Res Logist (NRL) 47(1):40–56
Hartman J (2001) An economic replacement model with probabilistic asset utilization. IIE Trans 33(9):717–727
Hartman JC, Murphy A (2006) Finite-horizon equipment replacement analysis. IIE Trans 38(5):409–419
Jones PC, Zydiak JL, Hopp WJ (1991) Parallel machine replacement. Nav Res Logist (NRL) 38(3):351–365
Joseph H (2004) Multiple asset replacement analysis under variable utilization and stochastic demand. Eur J Oper Res 159(1):145–165
Karabakal N, Lohmann JR, Bean JC (1994) Parallel replacement under capital rationing constraints. Manag Sci 40(3):305–319
Keles P, Hartman JC (2004) Case study: bus fleet replacement. Eng Econ 49(3):253–278
Kim D, Porter J, Kriett P, Mbugua W, Wagner T (2009) Fleet replacement modeling. Final report
Lammert M (2008) Long beach transit: two-year evaluation of gasoline-electric hybrid transit buses. Technical report. National renewable energy laboratory
Laver R, Schneck D, Skorupski D, Brady S, Cham L (2007). Useful life of transit buses and vans. Final report. Federal transit administration
Nigel C, Zhen F, Wayne S, Lyons D (2007) Transit bus life cycle cost and year 2007 emissions estimation. Final report. West Virginia University
Nigel C, Zhen F, Wayne W, Schiavone J, Chambers C, Golub A, Chandler K (2009) Assessment of hybrid-electric transit bus technology. Transportation research board
Oakford RV, Lohmann J, Salazar A (1984) A dynamic replacement economy decision model. IIE Trans 16(1):65–72
Parametrix and LTK Engineering Services (2011) King county trolley bus evaluation. King County Metro Transit, Seattle
Schiavone J (1997) Monitoring bus maintenance performance. Transit cooperative research program (TCRP) synthesis. Transportation research board
Simms BW, Lamarre BG, Jardine AKS, Boudreau A (1984) Optimal buy, operate and sell policies for fleets of vehicles. Eur J Oper Res 15(2):183–195
US EIA (2011) Annual energy outlook 2011. US energy information administration
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to acknowledge Oregon Transportation Research and Education Consortium (OTREC) for supporting this research. We are also thankful to Gary Prince, Ralph McQuillan and Steve Policar from King County Metro Transit who provided us valuable data, comments and criticism.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Feng, W., Figliozzi, M. Vehicle technologies and bus fleet replacement optimization: problem properties and sensitivity analysis utilizing real-world data. Public Transp 6, 137–157 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0086-z
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-014-0086-z
Keywords
- Bus fleet replacement
- Optimization model
- Model properties
- Diesel
- Hybrid diesel
- Subsidy
- Cost elasticity
- Breakeven values