Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Integration of paratransit systems with inner-city bus transport: the case of Izmir

  • Case Study and Application
  • Published:
Public Transport Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Rapid increases in population and migration forces the growth of development areas to be directed towards the urban fringes through either disjointed incrementalism or sprawl. Since an increasing population creates the need for a parallel expansion of transport facilities, and due to the inadequacies of existing mass transportation networks, this need is best met by paratransit systems. In cities where the population is reaching saturation levels, the rising demand for travel imposes a heavy load on transport networks, which in turn implies that the development and integration of mass transportation networks should be a priority. As an intermediate means of mass transportation between public and private systems, paratransit services provide support by offering considerable opportunities, particularly for the topographically disadvantageous areas which often emerge as result of unplanned and uncontrolled growth. Especially in developing countries, paratransit services can also be regarded as complementary to mass transportation networks and are often preferred as a solution (though short-term) to challenging transportation problems that cannot be overcome by public services. This study targets the integration of public bus transport systems with that of paratransit services while still maintaining the original management structure of both. Within this context, the study presents an examination of the city center of Izmir, Turkey. The proposed method involves the estimation of the costs and benefits of bus routes, the determination of routes to be allocated to a paratransit system, and management proposals for the integration of paratransit services into the network. There also has been an additional analysis regarding the costs and benefits, examining their distribution within the sprawling development of urban areas, determining districts where bus lines operate with the least profit and where the number of transfers from the bus system to paratransit systems is the highest. In this vein, suggestions are made with reference to how and in which districts there can be optimum integration of public and paratransit transport.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Babalık E (2000) Urban railsystems: a planning framework to increase their success. Unpublished Doctor of Philosophy, University of London, London, UK

  • Babalık E (2012) Kentsel ulaşım politikaları. Kentsel Ulaşım. Ninova yayınları, Istanbul

  • Black A (1995) Urban mass transportation planning. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Brake J, Mulley C, Nelson JD, Wright S (2007) Key lessons learned from recent experience with flexible transport services. Transp Policy 14:458–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Golub A (2007) Informal transport: a global perspective. Transp Policy 14:445–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chamber of Minibus Jitneys (2012) Personal interview, board representative of Chamber of Minibus Jitneys. Izmir

  • Diana M, Quadrifoglio L, Pronello C (2007) Emissions of demand responsive services as an alternative to conventional transit systems. Transp Res Part D 12:183–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dikas G, Minis I (2014) Scheduled paratransit transport systems. Transp Res Part B 67:18–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elker C (2012) Kentsel Ulaşım Politikaları. Kentsel Ulaşım. Ninova yayınları, Istanbul

  • ESHOT General Directorate (2011) 68 yıllık ulaşım serüveni. Strateji Geliştirme Dairesi Başkanlığı, İzmir

  • ESHOT General Directorate (2012) Kentkart Passenger Boarding Database, Izmir

  • Fitzgerald J, Shaunesey D, Stern S (2000) The effect of education programs on paratransit demand of people with disabilities. Transp Res Part A 34(4):261–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Gholami A, Mohaymany AS (2011) Analogy of fixed route shared taxi (taxi khattee) and bus services under various demand density and economical conditions. J Adv Transp 46:177–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grava S (2004) Urban transportation systems, choices for communities. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Gupta D, Chen HW, Miller LA, Surya F (2010) Improving the efficiency of demand-responsive paratransit services. Transp Res Part A 44:201–217

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall CH, Andersson H, Lundgren JT, Varbrand P (2009) The integrated dial-a-ride problem. Public Transp 1:39–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CH, Högberg M, Lundgren JT (2012) A modeling system for simulation of dial-a-ride services. Public Transp 4:17–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall CH, Lundgren JT, Voβ S (2015) Evaluating the performance of a dial-a-ride service using simulation. Public Transp 7:139–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalpakçı A (2013) Ara toplu taşım sistemlerinin şehir içi otobüs sistemleri ile entegrasyonu, İzmir örneği. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, Graduate School of Applied Sciences, Izmir

  • Karataş N (2007) İzmir’deki Şehirsel Saçaklanma Eğilimlerinin Torbalı-Ayrancılar’da Arazi Sahipliliği El Değişim Süreçlerine Etkileri, TMMOB Şehir Plancıları Odası Planlama Dergisi, 2007-2, pp 3–10

  • Kınay T (2012) Personal interview, consultant of Chamber of Minibus Jitneys, Izmir

  • Mageean J, Nelson JD (2003) The evaluation of demand responsive transport services in Europe. J Transp Geogr 11:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Metropolitan Municipality of Izmir (MMI) (2011) Quantitative data on minibus jitney lines, Transportation Department, Institutional Datas in 2011, Izmir

  • Nelson JD, Wright S, Masson B, Ambrosino G, Naniopoulos A (2010) Recent developments in flexible transport services. Res Transp Econ 29:243–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nguyen-Hoang P, Yeung R (2010) What is paratransit worth? Transp Res Part A 44:841–853

    Google Scholar 

  • Oral Y (2010) “Paratransit sistemler”, İBŞB İzmir Ulaşım Ana Planı Sonuç Raporu Özeti, Metropolitan Municipality of Izmir (MMI), İzmir

  • Orski CK (1975) Paratransit: the coming of age of a transportation concept. Transportation 4:329–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos D, Alschuler D (1975) Paratransit-existing ıssues and future directions. Transportation 4:335–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shimazaki T, Rahman M (1996) Physical characteristics of paratransit in developing countries of Asia. J Adv Transp 30:5–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tekeli İ, Okyay T (1981) Dolmuşun Öyküsü. Çevre ve Mimarlık Bilimleri Yayınları, Ankara

  • Tekeli İ, Gülöksüz Y, Okyay T (1976) Gecekondulu dolmuşlu işportalı şehir. Cem Yayınevi, Istanbul

  • Turkish Statistical Institute (Turk Stat) (2013) Population of provinces by years, 2007–2014. http://www.tuik.gov.tr/UstMenu.do?metod=temelist. Accessed March 2013

  • Web 1: Petrol Ofisi Corporation (PQ) (2013) Recommended sail prices of fuel oil. http://gm.poas.com.tr/POASFIYAT/Fiyatlar.aspx?u=guest. Accessed Feb 2013

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is based on the results of the Master’s Thesis by Kalpakçı, A (2014) Ara Toplu Taşım Sistemlerinin Şehir İçi Otobüs Sistemleri ile Entegrasyonu, İzmir Örneği. Unpublished Masters Thesis, Dokuz Eylul University, Graduate School of Applied Sciences, Izmir.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neslihan Karataş Ünverdi.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 4.

Table 4 Number of vehicles—passengers at minibus jitney lines and their operating speeds (MMI 2011)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kalpakcı, A., Karataş Ünverdi, N. Integration of paratransit systems with inner-city bus transport: the case of Izmir. Public Transp 8, 405–426 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0136-9

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12469-016-0136-9

Keywords

Navigation