Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

SOA adoption in business networks: do service-oriented architectures really advance inter-organizational integration?

  • Special Theme
  • Published:
Electronic Markets Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The emergence of the Internet as a global communication infrastructure has dramatically reduced interaction costs within and across organizations, with significant impact on inter-organizational relationships, vertical industry structures, and markets. More recently, service-oriented architectures (SOA) and Web services have introduced the next paradigm shift and foster the idea of dynamic business networks with quick connect and disconnect relationships. However, little research has systematically analyzed how companies leverage SOA to improve their inter-organizational relationships and reshape their business networks. In addition, the mature research stream on inter-organizational information systems (IOS) has not yet sufficiently considered SOA. In order to close this gap, our research seeks to improve the fundamental understanding of how SOA is applied in business networks and how it differs from prior forms of IOS. Using an exploratory research approach, we investigate 33 SOA cases to identify focus areas and patterns of SOA adoption in business networks. Our case analysis builds on a multi-dimensional classification scheme which we derived from prior literature. While our empirical findings do not confirm all promising propositions related to SOA, they underline the specific contribution of SOA compared to prior forms of IOS. We conclude by suggesting five clusters of SOA adoption in the inter-organizational domain, each of those introducing new aspects in the coordination of distributed business networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Naeem, T., Rabhi, F. A., Benatallah, B., & Ray, P. K. (2004). Systematic approaches for designing B2B applications. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 9(2), 41–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alonso, G., Casati, F., Kuno, H., & Machiraju, V. (2003). Web services: Concepts, architectures and applications. Springer.

  • Alt, R., & Österle, H. (2004). Real-time business: Lösungen, Bausteine und Potentiale des Business Networking. Springer.

  • Alt, R., Legner, C., & Österle, H. (2005). Virtuelle Organisation—Konzept, Realität und Umsetzung. HMD- Praxis der Wirtschaftsinformatik, (242), 7–20.

  • Baida, Z., Rukanova, B., Liu, J., & Tan, Y.-H. (2008). Preserving control in trade procedure redesign—the beer living lab. Electronic Markets, 18(1), 53–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee, S., & Golhar, D. Y. (1994). Electronic data interchange: characteristics of users and nonusers. Information Management, 26(2), 65–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bauer, S., & Stickel, E. (1998). Auswirkungen der Informationstechnologie auf die Entstehung kooperativer Netzwerkorganisationen. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 40(5), 434–442.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benbasat, I., Goldstein, D. K., & Mead, M. (1987). The case research strategy in studies of information systems. MIS Quarterly, 11(3), 369–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buhl, H. U., Heinrich, B., Henneberger, M., & Krammer, A. (2008). Service science. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 50(1), 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussler, C. (2002). The role of B2B engines in B2B integration architectures. SIGMOD Record, 31(1), 67–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bussler, C. (2003). B2B-integration: Concepts and architecture. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, M., Zhang, D., & Zhou, L. (2007). Empowering collaborative commerce with Web services enabled business process management systems. Decision Support Systems, 43, 530–546.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiaanse, E., & Venkatraman, N. (2002). Beyond sabre: an empirical test of expertise exploitation in electronic channels. MIS Quarterly, 26(1), 15–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiaanse, E., Van Diepen, T., & Damsgaard, J. (2004). Proprietary versus internet technologies and the adoption and impact of electronic marketplaces. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 13(2), 151–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, R. (2001). Towards a taxonomy of B2B e-Commerce schemes. Paper presented at the 14th Bled Electronic Commerce Conference). Bled.

  • Clemons, E. K., Reddi, S. P., & Row, M. C. (1993). The impact of information technology on the organization of economic activity: the “move to the middle” hypothesis. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(2), 9–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coenen, A. (2006). An SOA case study: Agility in practice. Retrieved from http://www.soamag.com/I2/1106-1.pdf.

  • Damsgaard, J., & Truex, D. (2000). Binary trading relations and the limits of EDI standards: the Procrustean bed of standards. European Journal of Information Systems, 9(3), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniel, E. M., & White, A. (2005). The future of inter-organisational system linkages: findings of an international Delphi study. European Journal of Information Systems, 14(2), 188–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirkan, H., Kauffman, R. J., Vayghan, J. A., Fill, H.-G., Karagiannis, D., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). Service-oriented technology and management: perspectives on research and practice for the coming decade. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 7(4), 356–376.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorn, J., Grün, C., Werthner, H., & Zapletal, M. (2009). From business to software: a B2B survey. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 7(2), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dubé, L., & Paré, G. (2003). Rigor in information systems positivist case research: current practices, trends, and recommendations. MIS Quarterly, 27(4), 597–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erl, T. (2005). Service-oriented architecture. Concepts, technology, and design. Prentice Hall International.

  • Fettke, P., & Loos, P. (2003). Classification of reference models: a methodology and its application. Information Systems and E-Business Management, 1(1), 35–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleisch, E. (2001). Das Netzwerkunternehmen. Strategien und Prozesse zur Steigerung der Wettbewerbsfähigkeit in der “Networked Economy”. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frick, N., & Schubert, P. (2009). An empirical study of the current state of B2B integration in practice. Paper presented at the 22nd Bled eConference “eEnablement”). Bled, Slovenia.

  • Gibbert, M., Ruigrok, W., & Wicki, B. (2008). What passes as a rigorous case study? Strategic Management Journal, 29(13), 1465–1474.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gosain, S., Malhotra, A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2004). Coordinating for flexibility in e-Business supply chains. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 7–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagel, J., III, & Brown, J. S. (2001). Your next IT strategy. Harvard Business Review, 79, 105–113.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heffner, R. (2005). Real-world SOA: SOA platform case studies. Forrester.

  • Heutschi, R. (2007). Serviceorientierte Architektur—Architekturprinzipien und Umsetzung in der Praxis. Berlin: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Holmqvist, M., & Pessi, K. (2004). Process integration and web services a case of evolutional development in a supply chain. Scandinavian Journal of Information Systems, 16, 117–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang, Y., & Chung, J.-Y. (2003). A Web services-based framework for business integration solutions. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 2(1), 15–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huhns, M. N. (2008). Services must become more agent-like. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 50(1), 74–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Iyer, B., Freedman, J., Gaynor, M., & Wyner, G. (2003). Web services: enabling dynamic business networks. Communications of the AIS, 11, 525–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobides, M. G., & Billinger, S. (2006). Designing the boundaries of the firm: from “Make, Buy, or Ally” to the dynamic benefits of vertical architecture. Organization Science, 17(2), 249–261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambil, A. (2008). Purposeful abstractions: thoughts on creating business network models. The Journal of Business Strategy, 29(1), 52–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kambil, A., & Short, J. E. (1994). Electronic integration and business network redesign: a roles-linkage perspective. Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(4), 59–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman, R. J., & Weill, P. (1989). An evaluative framework for research on the performance effects of IT investment. Paper presented at the 10th International Conference on Information Systems). Atlanta, GA.

  • Klein, S. (1996). Interorganisationssysteme und Unternehmensnetzwerke: Deutscher Universitätsverlag.

  • Kuan, K. K. Y., & Chau, P. Y. K. (2001). A perception-based model for EDI adoption in small businesses using a technology-organization-environment framework. Information Management, 38(8), 507–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Legner, C., & Vogel, T. (2008). Leveraging web services for implementing vertical industry standards: a model for service-based interoperability. Electronic Markets, 18(1), 39–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, Y., Lu, X., Kuo-Ming, C., Huang, Y., & Younas, M. (2006). The realization of service-oriented e-Marketplaces. Information Systems Frontiers, 8, 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linthicum, D. S. (2001). B2B application integration: E-business-enable your enterprise. Boston: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Löwer, U. M. (2005). Interorganisational standards: Managing web services specifications for flexible supply chains. Physica-Verlag.

  • Luthria, H., & Rabhi, F. (2009). Service oriented computing in practice—an agenda for research into the factors influencing the organizational adoption of service oriented architectures. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 4(1), 39–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maglio, P. P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen, J. T., & Spohrer, J. (2006). Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 81–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W. (1987). Modeling coordination in organizations and markets. Management Science, 33(10), 1317–1332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malone, T. W., Yates, J., & Benjamin, R. I. (1987). Electronic markets and electronic hierarchies. Communications of the ACM, 30(6), 484–497.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayring, P. (2000). Qualitative content analysis. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 1(2).

  • McAfee, A. (2005). Will web services really transform collaboration? MIT Sloan Management Review, 46(2), 78–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melville, N., Kraemer, K. L., & Gurbaxani, V. (2004). Review: information technology and organizational performance: an integrative model of IT business value. MIS Quarterly, 28(2), 283–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merrifield, R., Calhoun, J., & Stevens, D. (2008). The next revolution in productivity. Harvard Business Review, 86(6), 72–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Österle, H., Fleisch, E., & Alt, R. (2001). Business networking—shaping collaboration between enterprises (Second Revised and Extended Edition ed.) Springer.

  • Papazoglou, M. P., & Georgakopoulos, D. (2003). Service-oriented computing. Communications of the ACM, 46(10), 25–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papazoglou, M. P., & van den Heuvel, W.-J. (2007). Service oriented architectures: approaches, technologies and research issues. The International Journal on Very Large Data Bases, 16(3), 389–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Premkumar, G. (2000). Interorganization systems and supply chain management: an information processing perspective. Information Systems Management, 17(3), 56–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reimers, K. (2001). Standardizing the new e-business platform: learning from the EDI experience. Electronic Markets, 11(4), 231–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reitbauer, S., Kohlmann, F., Eckert, C., Mansfeldt, K., & Alt, R. (2008). Redesigning Business Networks—Reference Process, Network and Service Map. Paper presented at the Symposium on Applied Computing (pp. 540–547). Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil.

  • Robertson, P. L., & Langlois, R. N. (1995). Innovation, networks, and vertical integration. Research Policy, 24(4), 543–562.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robey, D., Im, G., & Wareham, J. D. (2008). Theoretical foundations of empirical research on interorganizational systems: assessing past contributions and guiding future directions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 9(9), 497–518.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodon, J. (2006). A methodological and conceptual review of inter organizational information systems integration. Paper presented at the Fourteenth European Conference on Information Systems (pp. 402–413). Goteborg.

  • Senger, E. (2004). Zum Stand der elektronischen Kooperation—Fallstudien, Muster und Handlungsoptionen. Unpublished Dissertation, Universität St. Gallen.

  • Siedersleben, J. (2007). SOA revisited: Komponentenorientierung bei Systemlandschaften. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 49(Sonderheft), 110–117.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinz, E. J. (2008). SOA und die bewährten methodischen Grundlagen der Entwicklung betrieblicher IT-Systeme. Wirtschaftsinformatik, 50(1), 70–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Son, J.-Y., Narasimhan, S., Riggins, F. J., & Kim, N. (2008). Understanding the development of IOS-based trading partner relationships: a structural model with empirical validation. Journal of Organizational Computing & Electronic Commerce, 1(18), 34–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spohrer, J., & Maglio, P. P. (2008). The emergence of service science: toward systematic service innovations to accelerate co-creation of value. Production & Operations Management, 17(3), 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tafti, A., Mithas, S., & Krishnan, M. S. (2008). The effects of information technology and service-oriented architectures on joint venture value. Paper presented at the ICIS 2008). Paris.

  • Van Heck, E., & Vervest, P. (2007). Smart business networks: how the network wins. Communications of the ACM, 50(6), 29–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Viering, G., Legner, C., & Ahlemann, F. (2009). The (Lacking) business perspective on SOA—critical themes in SOA research. Paper presented at the 9. Internationale Tagung Wirtschaftsinformatik (pp. 45–54). Vienna, Austria.

  • Vogel, T., Schmidt, A., Lemm, A., & Österle, H. (2008). Service and document based interoperability for European eCustoms solutions. Journal of Theoretical and Applied Electronic Commerce Research, 3(3), 17–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wareham, J., Zheng, J. G., & Straub, D. (2005). Critical themes in electronic commerce research: a meta-analysis. Journal of Information Technology, 20(1), 1–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkes, L. (2004). Amazon and eBay web services—the new enterprise applications. CDBi Journal(October), 9–20.

  • Yin, R. K. (2003). Case study research—design and methods (3rd edn. Vol. 5). SAGE Publications.

  • Zhao, J. L., & Cheng, H. K. (2005). Web services and process management: a union of convenience or a new area of research? Decision Support Systems, 40(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhao, J. L., Tanniru, M., & Zhang, L. J. (2007). Services computing as the foundation of enterprise agility: overview of recent advances and introduction to the special issue. Information Systems Frontiers, 9(1), 1–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., Gurbaxani, V., & Xin Xu, S. (2006). Migration to open-standard interorganizational systems: network effects, switching costs, and path dependency. MIS Quarterly, 30(Special Issue on Standards), 515–539.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Institute of Research on Information Systems (IRIS), EBS Business School, Söhnleinstr. 8D, 65201, Wiesbaden, Germany

    Jan Löhe & Christine Legner

Authors
  1. Jan Löhe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Christine Legner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christine Legner.

Additional information

Responsible editor: Rainer Alt

Appendix

Appendix

Table 6 Overview of SOA case studies
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Löhe, J., Legner, C. SOA adoption in business networks: do service-oriented architectures really advance inter-organizational integration?. Electron Markets 20, 181–196 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0046-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12525-010-0046-7

Keywords

JEL Classification

Search

Navigation