Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Development on the reconstruction of photothermal imaging method for subsurface structure

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Visualization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The photothermal imaging technique is a nondestructive inspection technique that visualizes the inside of a metal by utilizing the photothermal effect. Although the concept of photothermal imaging techniques has been proposed, systematic research on the characteristics thereof has not been conducted. This study attempts to enhance the measurement and reconstruction process for a photothermal imaging method. To detect the edge of a subsurface pattern more accurate, low-pass FFT (fast Fourier transform) filter for noise reduction of measured data, and derivative detectors are adopted for the reconstruction of photothermal imaging. The adopted methods are applied to and visualize 20 mm × 25 mm × 1.5 mm copper block including radius 5 mm, height 1 mm cylindrical resin as a subsurface pattern. The results show that the developed method can detect the edge of the resin subsurface 50% more accurately than the previous reconstruction method for photothermal imaging.

Graphical abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ahmad MB, Choi T-S (1999) Local threshold and boolean function based edge detection. IEEE Trans Consum Electron 45:674–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antoniou A (2016) Digital signal processing. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagavathiappan S, Lahiri B, Saravanan T, Philip J, Jayakumar T (2013) Infrared thermography for condition monitoring–A review. Infrared Phys Technol 60:35–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berciaud S, Cognet L, Blab GA, Lounis B (2004) Photothermal heterodyne imaging of individual nonfluorescent nanoclusters and nanocrystals. Phys Rev Lett 93:257402. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.257402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ciampa F, Mahmoodi P, Pinto F, Meo M (2018) Recent advances in active infrared thermography for non-destructive testing of aerospace components. Sensors (Basel) 18:609. https://doi.org/10.3390/s18020609

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooley J, Lewis P, Welch P (1967) Historical notes on the fast fourier transform. IEEE Trans Audio Electroacoust 15:76–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedrich K, Haupt K, Seidel U, Walther HG (1992) Definition, resolution, and contrast in photothermal imaging. J Appl Phys 72:3759–3764

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gao B, He Y, Woo WL, Tian GY, Liu J, Hu Y (2016) Multidimensional tensor-based inductive thermography with multiple physical fields for offshore wind turbine gear inspection. IEEE Trans Industr Electron 63:6305–6315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haynes WM (2014) CRC handbook of chemistry and physics. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Heideman M, Johnson D, Burrus C (1984) Gauss and the history of the fast fourier transform. IEEE ASSP Magazine 1:14–21

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Jafarzadeh H, Udoye CI, Kinoshita J-I (2008) The application of tooth temperature measurement in endodontic diagnosis: a review. J Endod 34:1435–1440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeon P, Lee E, Lee K, Yoo J (2001) A theoretical study for the thermal diffusivity measurement using photothermal deflection scheme. Energy Eng J 10:63–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Yoo J, Kim D-K, Kim H (2015) Numerical study on visualization method for material distribution using photothermal effect. J Mech Sci Technol 29:4499–4507

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim M, Kim G, Yoo J, Kim D-K, Kim H (2018) Experimental study on the influence of surface roughness for photothermal imaging with various measurement conditions. Thermochim Acta 661:7–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Körner TW (1989) Fourier analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Maini R, Aggarwal H (2009) Study and comparison of various image edge detection techniques. Int J Image Process (IJIP) 3:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Marr D, Hildreth E (1980) Theory of edge detection. Proc R Soc Lond B 207:187–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McDonald FA, Wetsel Jr GC, Stotts SA (1982) Scanned photothermal imaging of subsurface structure. In: Acoustical imaging, pp 147–155

  • McDonald FA, Wetsel Jr GC, Jamieson GE (1985) Spatial resolution of subsurface structure in photothermal imaging. In: Acoustical imaging, pp 377–385

  • Murphy JC, Aamodt LC (1981) Optically detected photothermal imaging. Appl Phys Lett 38:196–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JC, Spicer JWM, Aamodt LC, Royce BSH (1990) Photoacoustic and photothermal phenomena II. Springer Series in Optical Sciences, 62

  • Nadernejad E, Sharifzadeh S, Hassanpour H (2008) Edge detection techniques: evaluations and comparisons. Appl Math Sci 2:1507–1520

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Natterer F, Wübbeling F (2001) Mathematical methods in image reconstruction, vol 5. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Owens R (1997) Lecture 6 computer vision IT412 10:29

  • Price S (1996) Edges: the canny edge detector. July

  • Prince JL, Links JM (2006) Medical imaging signals and systems. Pearson Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  • Salazar A, Sánchez-Lavega A, Fernandez J (1991) Thermal diffusivity measurements in solids by the ‘‘mirage’’ technique: experimental results. J Appl Phys 69:1216–1223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salazar A, Sánchez-Lavega A, Fernández J (1993) Thermal diffusivity measurements on solids using collinear mirage detection. J Appl Phys 74:1539–1547

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sell J (2012) Photothermal investigations of solids and fluids. Elsevier, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y et al (2018) Thermal pattern contrast diagnostic of micro cracks with induction thermography for aircraft braking components. IEEE Trans Industr Inform. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2018.2802046

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetsel GC Jr, McDonald FA (1984) Resolution and definition in photothermal imaging. J Appl Phys 56:3081–3085

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was supported partly by the Basic Science Research Program through the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Education (NRF-2015R1D1A1A01060704 and NRF-2017R1D1A1B03035832).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hyunjung Kim.

Appendix

Appendix

In this appendix, we describe in detail the process of obtaining the smoothed result using the low-pass FFT filter from the experimental data in Fig. 4.

To explain the smoothing process, it is necessary to clarify the Fourier transform. Equations (1, 2) are a general expression for Fourier transform. As is already well known, the function of the spatial domain \(f(x)\) can be represented by the integration of sinusoidal functions (\(e^{{i\omega_{s} x}}\), Euler’s formula) such as sine/cosine, and the amplitude and phase information of the sinusoidal function is included in \(F(\omega_{s} )\). Therefore, complex numbers (sinusoidal function), amplitude and phase can be obtained by performing FFT. Figure 8 shows the graphs for the real part of the complex numbers (sinusoidal functions) and amplitude of the FFT result on the experimental data.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Complex number (real only, a) and amplitude (b) of FFT result

In this study, a low-pass FFT filter is designed based on amplitude to remove noise for small amplitude. To remove the noise, the following transformation process was performed. First, as shown in Fig. 9a, the cutoff spatial frequency is determined as the bottom 5% of amplitude for the maximum one the FFT result. According to the cutoff spatial frequency, only the lower spatial frequency signals than the 5% cutoff one are left from the experimental result, as shown in Fig. 9a. Then, the filtered FFT result using the low-pass filter (which depends on the filter criteria) is restored to a smoothed signal through the IFFT. The same transformation process applies to all other filter criteria (1%, 0.5%, 0.05%).

Fig. 9
figure 9

Cutoff region for complex number (real only, a) and amplitude (b) of FFT result

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, M., Yoo, J., Kim, DK. et al. Development on the reconstruction of photothermal imaging method for subsurface structure. J Vis 22, 329–339 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-018-0533-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-018-0533-z

Keywords

Navigation