Abstract
Laminar juncture flow is numerically studied to investigate the outermost saddle point of separation/attachment (SS/SA) and the topological transition. The topological transition trends obtained through computational results are in close agreement with the experiments. The outermost topology in the symmetry plane tends to transform from attachment to separation as the obstacle shape bluntness increases or as the ratio of the boundary layer thickness to the maximum width of the obstacle δ/W decreases. A coefficient CS/A based on Lighthill’s volume flow theory is devised to estimate the separation or attachment of the fluid. The newly proposed criterion is applied to the limiting streamlines, very close to the flat surface, in the vicinity of saddle point to decide its topological nature. A single quadrant around the saddle point is considered for detailed theoretical analysis, and its further division into four subzones facilitates the application of the proposed criterion (CS/A) to assess the flow attachment and separation characteristics. The decisive coefficient is successfully applied at various locations with separation/attachment flow configurations and found consistent with the qualitative results.
Graphical Abstract
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chapman GT (1986) Topological classification of flow separation on three-dimensional bodies. AIAA Paper 86-0485
Chen C, Hung C (1992) Numerical study of juncture flows. AIAA J 30(7):1800–1807
Coon MD, Tobak M (1995) Experimental study of saddle point of attachment in laminar juncture flow. AIAA J 33(12):2288–2292
Foss JF (2004) Surface selections and topological constraint evaluations for flow field analyses. Exp Fluids 37:883–898
Hu B, Zhang H, Younis MY, Li Y, Raza MS (2015) Experimental investigation on the transition of separation/attachment in steady laminar juncture flows. Exp Fluids 56(4):74
Hung C, Sung C, Chen C (1992) Computation of saddle point of attachment. AIAA J 30(6):1561–1569
Hunt JCR, Abell CJ, Peterka JA, Woo H (1978) Kinematical studies of the flows around free or surface-mounted obstacles: applying topology to flow visualization. J Fluid Mech 86:179–200
Jeong J, Hussain F (1995) On the identification of a vortex. J Fluid Mech 285:69–94
Le Clainche S, Li JI, Theofilis V, Soria J (2015) Flow around a hemisphere-cylinder at high angle of attack and low Reynolds number. Part I: experimental and numerical investigation. Aero Sci Technol 44:77–87
Le Clainche S, Rodriguez D, Theofilis V, Soria J (2016) Formation of three-dimensional structures in the hemisphere-cylinder. AIAA J 54(12):1–11
Lighthill MJ (1963) Boundary layer theory. In: Rosenhead L (ed) Laminar boundary layers. Clarendon, Oxford, pp 45–88
Liu T, Woodiga S, Ma T (2011) Skin friction topology in a region enclosed by penetrable boundary. Exp Fluids 51:1549–1562
Perry AE, Fairlie BD (1974) Critical points in flow patterns. Adv Geophys 18(1):299–315
Rizzetta DP (1994) Numerical simulation of turbulent cylinder juncture flow fields. AIAA J 32(6):1113–1119
Rodriguez D, Theofilis V (2010) Structural changes of laminar separation bubbles induced by global linear instability. J Fluid Mech 655:280–305
Simpson RL (2001) Junction flows. Annu Rev Fluid Mech 33:415–443
Surana A, Grunberg O, Haller G (2006) Exact theory of three-dimensional flow separation. Part 1. Steady separation. J Fluid Mech 564:57–103
Surana A, Jacobs GB, Haller G (2007) Extraction of separation and attachment surfaces from three-dimensional steady shear flows. AIAA J 45(6):1290–1302
Surana A, Jacobs GB, Grunberg O, Haller G (2008) An exact theory of three-dimensional fixed separation in unsteady flows. Phys Fluids 20:107101–107122
Tai T, Walker M (1991) On three-dimensional flow separation criteria. AIAA Paper 91-1740
Tobak M, Peake DJ (1979) Topology of two-dimensional and three-dimensional separated flows. AIAA Paper 79-1480
Visbal MR (1991) Structure of laminar juncture flows. AIAA J 29(8):1273–1282
Wong JH, Png EK (2009) Numerical investigation of the wing-body junction vortex using various large Eddy simulation models. AIAA Paper 2009-4159
Wu J, Ma H, Zhou M (2005) Vorticity and vortex dynamics. Springer, New York
Younis MY, Zhang H, Hu B, Muhammad Z, Mehmood S (2014a) Investigation of different aspects of laminar horseshoe vortex system using PIV. J Mech Sci Technol 28(2):527–537
Younis MY, Zhang H, Hu B, Mehmood S (2014b) Topological evolution of laminar juncture flows under different critical parameters. Sci China Technol Sci 57:1342–1351
Younis MY, Zhang H, Mehmood M, Aslam J (2014c) Topological investigation of unsteady laminar juncture vortex system. In: Proceedings of 2014 11th international Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST); 2014 Jan 14–18; Islamabad, Pakistan. IEEE, pp 257–262
Zhang H (2005) Structural analysis of separated flows and vortex motion. National Defense Industry Press, Beijing
Zhang H, Hu B, Younis MY, Wang H, Liu Y (2012a) Investigation on existence and evolution of attachment saddle point structure of 3-D separation in juncture flow. In: Proceedings of 2012 9th international Bhurban conference on applied sciences and technology (IBCAST); 2012 Jan 9–12; Islamabad, Pakistan. IEEE, pp 247–253
Zhang H, Younis MY, Hu B, Wang H, Wang X (2012b) Investigation of attachment saddle point structure of 3-D steady separation in laminar juncture flow using PIV. J Vis 15:241–252
Zhong H, Woodiga S, Wang P, Shang J, Cui X, Wang J, Liu T (2015) Skin-friction topology of wing-body juncture flows. Eur J Mech B Fluid 53:55–67
Acknowledgements
The project is supported by the Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 11372027 and 10872022).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hu, B., Zhang, H. & Younis, M.Y. Saddle point of separation/attachment and topology transition in laminar juncture flows. J Vis 22, 713–727 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-019-00564-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12650-019-00564-7