Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

SEES: a scalable and energy-efficient scheme for green IoT-based heterogeneous wireless nodes

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Realizing energy-efficient communication in the IoT-based large-scale systems has become a key challenge in the past few years. The need is to minimize the global energy usage of battery-operated objects so as to reduce data transmission cost and extend the network lifetime. In this paper, we propose SEES, a scalable and energy-efficient scheme for green IoT-based heterogeneous wireless nodes. We study the impact of energy-harvesting techniques by utilizing ambient energy-harvesting relay nodes in such a way that enables a higher energy conservation and guarantees a long-lived network. SEES includes: (1) a zone-based hybrid-placement scheme, (2) a Multi-Stage Weighted Election heuristic (MSWE), and (3) a Minimum Cost Cross-layer Transmission model (MCCT). Our aim is to ensure an even-random deployment of heterogeneous nodes, a scalable pre-deterministic placement of energy-harvesting nodes, a fair energy-load balancing among all the zones, and a minimum energy-cost for data transmission from the bottom layer to the topmost layer. SEES is a general scheme that supports up to n levels of heterogeneity, as well as m different election parameters (static and dynamic, associated with m generated weights), and can be used for any type of IoT-based deployment. Experimental results of extensive simulations indicate the superiority of SEES over the other traditional protocols proposed in literature. It can save up to \(62\%\) of the total energy, and, at least, it increases the network lifetime by 58, 68, 70, \(42\%\); the stability period by 192, 108, 424, \(150\%\); and the network throughput by 107, 111, 100, \(114\%\); over LEACH, SEP, ZSEP, and hetDEEC protocols respectively, for all the cases and scenarios tested.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abbas Z, Yoon W (2015) A survey on energy conserving mechanisms for the internet of things: wireless networking aspects. Sensors 15(10):24,818–24,847

  • Abbasi AA, Younis M (2007) A survey on clustering algorithms for wireless sensor networks. Comput Commun 30(1415):2826–2841

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdollahzadeh S, Navimipour NJ (2016) Deployment strategies in the wireless sensor network: a comprehensive review. Comput Commun 91–92:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Abdul-Qawy ASH, Srinivasulu T (2017) EH-mulSEP: energy-harvesting enabled multi-level SEP protocol for IoT-based heterogeneous WSNs. In: 3rd International Conference on Applied and Theoretical Computing and Communication Technology (iCATccT) (Presented)

  • Agiwal M, Roy A, Saxena N (2016) Next generation 5g wireless networks: a comprehensive survey. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutori 18(3):1617–1655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akyildiz I, Su W, Sankarasubramaniam Y, Cayirci E (2002) Wireless sensor networks: a survey. Comput Netw 38(4):393–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fuqaha A, Guizani M, Mohammadi M, Aledhari M, Ayyash M (2015) Internet of things: a survey on enabling technologies, protocols, and applications. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutor 17(4):2347–2376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anastasi G, Conti M, Francesco MD, Passarella A (2009) Energy conservation in wireless sensor networks: a survey. Ad Hoc Netw 7(3):537–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Augustin A, Yi J, Clausen T, Townsley WM (2016) A study of lora: long range and low power networks for the internet of things. Sensors 16(9)

  • Bauer M, Bui N, De Loof J, Magerkurth C, Nettsträter A, Stefa J, Walewski JW (2013) IoT Reference Model. Springer, Berlin Heidelberg, pp 113–162

    Google Scholar 

  • Begishev V, Samuylov A, Moltchanov D, Samouylov K (2017) Modeling the process of dynamic resource sharing between lte and nb-iot services. In: Vishnevskiy VM, Samouylov KE, Kozyrev DV (eds) Distributed computer and communication networks. Springer, Cham, pp 1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Borgia E (2014) The internet of things vision: key features, applications and open issues. Comput Commun 54:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brar GS, Rani S, Chopra V, Malhotra R, Song H, Ahmed SH (2016) Energy efficient direction-based pdorp routing protocol for wsn. IEEE Access 4:3182–3194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carbajales RJ, Zennaro M, Pietrosemoli E, Freitag F (2015) Energy-efficient internet of things monitoring with low-capacity devices. In: Internet of Things (WF-IoT), 2015 IEEE 2nd World Forum on, pp 305–310

  • de Carvalho Silva J, Rodrigues JJPC, Alberti AM, Solic P, Aquino ALL (2017) Lorawan—a low power wan protocol for internet of things: a review and opportunities. In: 2017 2nd International Multidisciplinary Conference on Computer and Energy Science (SpliTech), pp 1–6

  • Chen M, Miao Y, Hao Y, Hwang K (2017) Narrow band internet of things. IEEE Access 5:20557–20577

  • Chen RC, Hsieh CF, Chang WL (2016) Using ambient intelligence to extend network lifetime in wireless sensor networks. J Ambient Intell Humaniz Comput 7(6):777–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui X, Liu Z (2009) Bcee: A balanced-clustering, energy-efficient hierarchical routing protocol in wireless sensor networks. In: 2009 IEEE International Conference on Network Infrastructure and Digital Content, pp 26–30

  • DGAniello G, Gaeta M, Hong TP, (2018) Effective quality-aware sensor data management. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput Intell 2(1):65–77

  • De Guglielmo D, Anastasi G, Seghetti A (2014) From IEEE 802.15.4 to IEEE 802.15.4e: a step towards the internet of things. Springer, Cham, pp 135–152

  • Decuir J (2010) Bluetooth 4.0: Lowenergy. Cambridge Silicon Radio SR PLC, UK

  • Djenouri D, Bagaa M (2015) Energy harvesting aware relay node addition for power-efficient coverage in wireless sensor networks. In: IEEE International Conference on Communications (ICC), pp 86–91

  • Faisal S, Javaid N, Javaid A, Khan MA, Bouk SH, Khan ZA (2013) Z-SEP: zonal-stable election protocol for wireless sensor networks. J Basic Appl Sci Res (JBASR) 3(5):132–139

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaeta M, Loia V, Tomasiello S (2015) Multisignal 1-d compression by F-transform for wireless sensor networks applications. Appl Soft Comput 30:329–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaeta M, Loia V, Tomasiello S (2016) Cubic bspline fuzzy transforms for an efficient and secure compression in wireless sensor networks. Inf Sci 339:19–30

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Gandotra P, Jha RK (2017) A survey on green communication and security challenges in 5g wireless communication networks. J Netw Comput Appl 96:39–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gandotra P, Jha RK, Jain S (2017) Green communication in next generation cellular networks: A survey. IEEE Access 5:11727–11758

  • Gherbi C, Aliouat Z, Benmohammed M (2016) An adaptive clustering approach to dynamic load balancing and energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks. Energy 114:647–662

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gulia S, Nagendra SS, Khare M, Khanna I (2015) Urban air quality management—a review. Atmos Pollut Res 6(2):286–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta V, Pandey R (2016) An improved energy aware distributed unequal clustering protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. Eng Sci Technol Int J 19(2):1050–1058

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hari U, Ramachandran B, Johnson C (2013) An unequally clustered multihop routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: International Conference on Advances in Computing, Communications and Informatics (ICACCI), pp 1007–1011

  • Heinzelman WB, Chandrakasan AP, Balakrishnan H (2002) An application-specific protocol architecture for wireless microsensor networks. IEEE Trans Wireless Commun 1(4):660–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heinzelman WR, Chandrakasan A, Balakrishnan H (2000) Energy-efficient communication protocol for wireless microsensor networks. In: 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, pp 1–10

  • Huang J, Meng Y, Gong X, Liu Y, Duan Q (2014) A novel deployment scheme for green internet of things. IEEE Internet Things J 1(2):196–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaffri ZUA, Cai Y (2014) Zet: Zone and energy threshold based clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: 23rd International Conference on Computer Communication and Networks (ICCCN), pp 1–6

  • Kamalinejad P, Mahapatra C, Sheng Z, Mirabbasi S, Leung VCM, Guan YL (2015) Wireless energy harvesting for the internet of things. IEEE Commun Mag 53(6):102–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Kim H, Hancke GP (2013) Environmental monitoring systems: a review. IEEE Sens J 13(4):1329–1339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar JS, Zaveri MA (2016) Hierarchical clustering for dynamic and heterogeneous internet of things. Proc Comput Sci 93:276 – 282, proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Advances in Computing and Communications

  • Kumaramangalam MV, Adiyapatham K, Kandasamy C (2014) Zone-based routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. Int Scholar Res Not 2014:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao Y, Qi H, Li W (2013) Load-balanced clustering algorithm with distributed self-organization for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Sens J 13(5):1498–1506

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin TH, Liaw DC (2015) Development of an intelligent disaster information-integrated platform for radiation monitoring. Nat Hazards 76(3):1711–1725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey S, Raghavendra C, Sivalingam KM (2002) Data gathering algorithms in sensor networks using energy metrics. IEEE Trans Parallel Distrib Syst 13(9):924–935

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • LoRa Alliance (2015) White paper: a technical overview of lora and lorawan. The LoRa Alliance, San Ramon

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu X, Wang P, Niyato D, Kim DI, Han Z (2015) Wireless networks with rf energy harvesting: a contemporary survey. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutor 17(2):757–789

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mahdavinejad MS, Rezvan M, Barekatain M, Adibi P, Barnaghi P, Sheth AP (2017) Machine learning for internet of things data analysis: a survey. Digital Communications and Networks

  • Maksimovic M (2018) Greening the future: green internet of things (G-IoT) as a key technological enabler of sustainable development. Springer, Cham, pp 283–313

    Google Scholar 

  • Mary SA, Gnanadurai JB (2016) Enhanced zone stable election protocol based on fuzzy logic for cluster head election in wireless sensor networks. Int J Fuzzy Syst, Springer pp 1–14

  • Mathna C, ODonnell T, Martinez-Catala RV, Rohan J, OFlynn B (2008) Energy scavenging for long-term deployable wireless sensor networks. Talanta 75(3):613–623

  • Mekki K, Bajic E, Chaxel F, Meyer F (2018) A comparative study of lpwan technologies for large-scale iot deployment. ICT Express

  • Meng J, Zhang X, Dong Y, Lin X (2012) Adaptive energy-harvesting aware clustering routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: 7th International ICST Conference on Communications and Networking (CHINACOM), pp 742–747

  • Minoli D (2011) Designing green networks and network operations: saving run-the-engine costs, 1st edn. CRC Press Inc, Boca Raton

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Minoli D (2013) Building the Internet of Things with IPv6 and MIPv6: the evolving world of M2M communications, 1st edn. Wiley, USA

  • Minoli D, Sohraby K, Kouns J (2017a) IoT security (IoTSec) considerations, requirements, and architectures. In: 2017 14th IEEE Annual Consumer Communications Networking Conference (CCNC), pp 1006–1007

  • Minoli D, Sohraby K, Occhiogrosso B (2017b) IoT considerations, requirements, and architectures for smart buildings energy optimization and next generation building management systems. IEEE Internet Things J 4(1):269–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Mondal P, Basu M (2009) Adoption of precision agriculture technologies in india and in some developing countries: scope, present status and strategies. Prog Nat Sci 19(6):659–666

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muruganathan SD, Ma DCF, Bhasin RI, Fapojuwo AO (2005) A centralized energy-efficient routing protocol for wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun Mag 43(3):S8–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naznin M, Chowdhury AS (2015) Zdg: Energy efficient zone based data gathering in a wireless sensor network. In: International Conference on Networking Systems and Security (NSysS), pp 1–7

  • Peng S, Wang T, Low C (2015) Energy neutral clustering for energy harvesting wireless sensors networks. Ad Hoc Netw 28:1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perera C, Liu CH, Jayawardena S (2015) The emerging internet of things marketplace from an industrial perspective: a survey. IEEE Trans Emerg Topics Comput 3(4):585–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierpaoli E, Carli G, Pignatti E, Canavari M (2013) Drivers of precision agriculture technologies adoption: A literature review. Procedia Technology 8:61–69, 6th International Conference on Information and Communication Technologies in Agriculture, Food and Environment (HAICTA 2013)

  • Qin Y, Sheng QZ, Falkner NJ, Dustdar S, Wang H, Vasilakos AV (2016) When things matter: a survey on data-centric internet of things. J Netw Comput Appl 64:137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rani S, Talwar R, Malhotra J, Ahmed S, Sarkar M, Song H (2015) A novel scheme for an energy efficient internet of things based on wireless sensor networks. Sensors 15(11):28603–28626

  • Rault T, Bouabdallah A, Challal Y (2014) Energy efficiency in wireless sensor networks: a top–down survey. Comput Netw 67:104–122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Samo D, Anka L (2009) Multi-attribute decision analysis in gis: weighted linear combination and ordered weighted averaging. Informatica 33:459474

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • SASA M, JB G (2015) A zone-based clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. In: 9th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Applications, pp 151–161

  • Schellberg J, Hill MJ, Gerhards R, Rothmund M, Braun M (2008) Precision agriculture on grassland: applications, perspectives and constraints. Eur J Agron 29(2):59–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shah T, Javaid N, Qureshi TN (2012) Energy efficient sleep awake aware (eesaa) intelligent sensor network routing protocol. In: 2012 15th International Multitopic Conference (INMIC), pp 317–322

  • Shahraki A, KuchakiRafsanjani M, BorumandSaeid A (2017) Hierarchical distributed management clustering protocol for wireless sensor networks. Telecommun Syst Springer 65(1):193–214

  • Shaikh FK, Zeadally S (2016) Energy harvesting in wireless sensor networks: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:1041–1054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaikh FK, Zeadally S, Exposito E (2017) Enabling technologies for green internet of things. IEEE Syst J 11(2):983–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shalli R, Jyoteesh M, Rajneesh T (2015) Energy efficient chain based cooperative routing protocol for {WSN}. Appl Soft Comput 35:386–397

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheikh OM, Mahmoud SA (2012) Cross-layer design for smart routing in wireless sensor networks. In: Wireless Sensor Networks—Technology and Protocols., InTech, chap 09, pp 189–214

  • Singh S (2017) Energy efficient multilevel network model for heterogeneous WSNs. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(1):105–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Malik A, Kumar R (2016) Energy efficient heterogeneous DEEC protocol for enhancing lifetime in WSNs. Eng Sci Technol Int J 20(1):345–353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smaragdakis G, Matta I, Bestavros A (2004) Sep: a stable election protocol for clustered heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. In: International Workshop on SANPA, pp 251–261

  • Sohraby K, Minoli D, Znati T (2007) Wireless sensor networks: technology, protocols, and applications. Wiley

  • Soyata T, Copeland L, Heinzelman W (2016) Rf energy harvesting for embedded systems: a survey of tradeoffs and methodology. IEEE Circuits Syst Mag 16(1):22–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tocchi A, Roca V, Angrisani L, Bonavolont F, Moriello RSL (2017) First step towards an iot implementation of a wireless sensors network for environmental radiation monitoring. In: 2017 IEEE International Instrumentation and Measurement Technology Conference (I2MTC), pp 1–6

  • Vangelista L, Zanella A, Zorzi M (2015) Long-range iot technologies: the dawn of lora™. In: Atanasovski V, Leon-Garcia A (eds) Future access enablers for ubiquitous and intelligent infrastructures. Springer, Cham, pp 51–58

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Wang YPE, Lin X, Adhikary A, Grovlen A, Sui Y, Blankenship Y, Bergman J, Razaghi HS (2017) A primer on 3g pp narrowband internet of things. IEEE Commun Mag 55(3):117–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weyrich M, Ebert C (2016) Reference architectures for the internet of things. IEEE Softw 33(1):112–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wixted AJ, Kinnaird P, Larijani H, Tait A, Ahmadinia A, Strachan N (2016) Evaluation of lora and lorawan for wireless sensor networks. In: 2016 IEEE SENSORS, pp 1–3

  • Yetgin H, Cheung KTK, El-Hajjar M, Hanzo LH (2017) A survey of network lifetime maximization techniques in wireless sensor networks. IEEE Commun Surveys Tutor 19(2):828–854

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Younis O, Fahmy S (2004) Heed: a hybrid, energy-efficient, distributed clustering approach for ad hoc sensor networks. IEEE Trans Mobile Comput 3(4)

  • Yu J, Qi Y, Wang G (2011) An energy-driven unequal clustering protocol for heterogeneous wireless sensor networks. J Control Theory Appl 9(1):133–139

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Xiao G, Tan HP (2013) Clustering algorithms for maximizing the lifetime of wireless sensor networks with energy-harvesting sensors. Comput Netw 57(14):2689–2704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang P, Tan HP, Xiao G, Yu Y (2015) Maximizing lifetime in clustered wsns with energy harvesting relay: Profiling and modeling. In: IEEE Tenth International Conference on Intelligent Sensors, Sensor Networks and Information Processing (ISSNIP), pp 1–6

  • Zhu C, Leung VCM, Shu L, Ngai ECH (2015) Green internet of things for smart world. IEEE Access 3:2151–2162

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Electronics and Communication Engineering, KU College of Engineering and Technology, Kakatiya University, Warangal, India

    Antar Shaddad H. Abdul-Qawy & T. Srinivasulu

Authors
  1. Antar Shaddad H. Abdul-Qawy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. T. Srinivasulu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Antar Shaddad H. Abdul-Qawy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdul-Qawy, A.S.H., Srinivasulu, T. SEES: a scalable and energy-efficient scheme for green IoT-based heterogeneous wireless nodes. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 10, 1571–1596 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0758-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-018-0758-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation