Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Research cooperations of blockchain: toward the view of complexity network

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Ambient Intelligence and Humanized Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Blockchain has critically influence on the implementations with respect to various territories. Recently, a flurry of papers, related to blockchain, are published under such background. However, most of them focus on specific topic due to space limitations, which cannot meet a high-level analysis. In this paper, lots of papers concerning blockchain, smart contracts and bitcoins are collected as many as possible such that we can carry on a comprehensive analysis on blockchain. More specifically, we construct keyword and author collaboration networks after removing the unrelated and low-quality works. Then we delve into the characteristics of complex networks, such as degree distribution, betweeness and closeness. We further present the networks with the help of visual tools like Pajek. Some unconspicuous hot topics are uncovered, with the help of complex network. These topics can in turn push the cross-field development of block chain technology, which may promote social development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alfonso P, Nachiket T, Giovanni M, Francesco L, Antonio P (2018) Blockchain and iot integration: a systematic survey. Sensors 18(8):2575

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aviv Z (2017) In: Proceedings of the 26th international joint conference on artificial intelligence, IJCAI 2017, Melbourne, Australia, August 19–25, 2017 (ijcai.org, 2017), pp 5161–5165

  • Bano S, Sonnino A, Al-Bassam M, Azouvi S, McCorry P, Meiklejohn S, Danezis G (2019) In: Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on advances in financial technologies, AFT 2019, Zurich, Switzerland, October 21–23, 2019 (ACM, 2019), pp 183–198

  • Barabási AL, Albert R (1999) Emergence of scaling in random networks. Science 286(5439):509

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Beauchamp MA (1965) An improved index of centrality. Behav Sci 10(2):161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Tian Y, Peng C (2020) An incentive-compatible rational secret sharing scheme using blockchain and smart contract. Sci Chin Inf Sci. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-019-2858-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorogovtsev SN, Mendes JF (2002) Evolution of networks. Adv Phys 51(4):1079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman LC (1977) A set of measures of centrality based on betweenness. Sociometry pp 35–41

  • Glaser F (2017) In: 50th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, HICSS 2017, Hilton Waikoloa Village, Hawaii, USA, January 4–7, 2017 (ScholarSpace/AIS Electronic Library (AISeL), 2017), pp 1–10

  • Holland PW, Leinhardt S (1971) Transitivity in structural models of small groups. Compar Group Stud 2(2):107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang N, Xu D, Zhou J, Yan H, Wan T, Zheng J (2020) Toward optimal participant decisions with voting-based incentive model for crowd sensing. Inf Sci 512:1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph B, Andrew M, Jeremy C, Arvind N, A KJ, W FE (2015) In: 2015 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy (IEEE, 2015), pp 104–121

  • Juhani N (1974) On the centrality in a graph. Scand J Psychol 15(1):332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ka AR, Hawoong J, Si Albert-La szlo B (2000) Error and attack tolerance of complex networks. Nature 406(6794):378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khanh NQ (2016) in 2016 3rd International conference on green technology and sustainable development (GTSD) (IEEE, 2016), pp. 51–54

  • Krystsina S (2017) Adoption of blockchain technologyin supply chain and logistics. Ph.D. thesis, Theseus

  • Li X, Jiang P, Chen T, Luo X, Wen Q (2017) A survey on the security of blockchain systems. Fut Gen Comput Syst

  • Liu Z, Wang L, Wang X, Shen X, Li L (2019) Secure remote sensing image registration based on compressed sensing in cloud setting. IEEE Access 7:36516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maher A, Aad VM (2017) Blockchain-based smart contracts: a systematic mapping study. arXiv:1710.06372

  • Malliaros FD, Vazirgiannis M (2013) Clustering and community detection in directed networks: a survey. Phys Rep 533(4):95

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Marc B, Nunes ALA (1999) Small-world networks: evidence for a crossover picture. Phys Rev Lett 82(15):3180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matjaž P (2010) Growth and structure of Slovenias scientific collaboration network. J Inf 4(4):475

    Google Scholar 

  • Michelle G, EJ NM (2002) Community structure in social and biological networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99(12):7821

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Nakamoto S (2019) Bitcoin: a peer-to-peer electronic cash system. Tech. rep, Manubot

    Google Scholar 

  • Nir K (2017) Can blockchain strengthen the internet of things? IT Prof 19(4):68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nunes ALA, Antonio S, Marc B, Eugene SH (2000) Classes of small-world networks. Proc Natl Acad Sci 97(21):11149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peter D (2015) In ALT Online Winter Conference 2015, pp 7–10

  • Roger G, Brian U, Jarrett S, Nunes ALA (2005) Team assembly mechanisms determine collaboration network structure and team performance. Science 308(5722):697

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santanu K, Santanu C (2018) Network-on-chip: the next generation of system-on-chip integration. CRC Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Santo F (2010) Community detection in graphs. Phys Rep 486(3–5):75

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sen P, Flaviano M, A MH (2018) In: Complex spreading phenomena in social systems, Springer, New York, pp 125–148

  • Shaw ME (1954) Group structure and the behavior of individuals in small groups. J Psychol 38(1):139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siva SL, M S, M S (2017) In: 2017 4th International conference on advanced computing and communication systems (ICACCS) (IEEE, 2017), pp 1–5

  • Stefano F, Gabriele DA (2020) On the ethereum blockchain structure: a complex networks theory perspective. Concurr Comput Pract Exp 32(12):e5493

    Google Scholar 

  • Strogatz SH (2001) Exploring complex networks. Nature 410(6825):268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian Y, Wang Z, Xiong J, Ma J (2020) A blockchain-based secure key management scheme with trustworthiness in dwsns. IEEE Trans Ind Inf 16(9):6193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walter W, David A, C DJ (2009) Mathematics and the internet: a source of enormous confusion and great potential. Notes Am Math Soc 56(5):586

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Wang X, Zhang Y, Gupta BB, Zhu H, Liu D (2019) An identity-based signcryption on lattice without trapdoor. J UCS 25(3):282

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, Andrea B, Li T, Li F, Cui X, Zhao M (2019) Randomness invalidates criminal smart contracts. Inf Sci 447:291

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watts D, Strogatz S (1998) Collective dynamics of small-world networks. Nature 393(6684):440

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang H, Yang Y, Han F, Zhao M, Guo L (2019) Containment control of heterogeneous fractional-order multi-agent systems. J Franklin Inst 356(2):752

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Wang H, Zheng X, Wang Y (2016) Effective algorithms for vertical mining probabilistic frequent patterns in uncertain mobile environments. Int J Ad-Hoc Ubiquit Comput 23(3–4):137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu X, Feng W, Wang H, Chu Q, Chen Q (2020) An attention mechanism and multi-granularity-based bi-lstm model for Chinese q&a system. Soft Comput 24:5831

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zainab A, Salma A, Mariam A, Ahmed AJ, Khaled S (2017) In 2017 international conference on electrical and computing technologies and applications (ICECTA) (IEEE, 2017), pp 1–4

  • Zhang L, Wang Y, Li F, Hu Y, Au MH (2019) A game-theoretic method based on q-learning to invalidate criminal smart contracts. Inf Sci 498:144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng X, Liu H (2010) A scalable coevolutionary multi-objective particle swarm optimizer. Int J Comput Intell 3(5):590

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was funded by Foundation of National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant numbers: 62072273, 61962009, 61832012, 61771231, 6150028, 61672321, 61771289), the Major Basic Research Project of Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province of China (ZR2018ZC0438), Natural Science Shandong Province (Grant numbers: ZR2016FM23, ZR2017MF010, ZR2017MF062), Key Research and Development Program of Shandong Province No. 2019GGX101025).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Computer Science, Qufu Normal University, Rizhao, China

    Yanli Wang, Yilei Wang, Zhaojie Wang & Guoyu Yang

  2. School of Information Science and Engineering, Shandong Normal University, Jinan, China

    Xiaomei Yu

Authors
  1. Yanli Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yilei Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhaojie Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Guoyu Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Xiaomei Yu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yilei Wang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wang, Y., Wang, Y., Wang, Z. et al. Research cooperations of blockchain: toward the view of complexity network. J Ambient Intell Human Comput 13, 1339–1352 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02596-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12652-020-02596-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation