Abstract
With the development of the Internet, people put more demands on networks. Among different networks, enterprise network faces more challenges, because of its large scale and diverse goals. Configuration of enterprise network is always daunting for network operators. In this paper, we propose a new routing protocol called TwoD-IP routing to facilitate enterprise network management. With TwoD-IP routing, we can achieve flexible management by providing different views on the same network for different users. We design the routing protocol algorithm, and implement it on a quagga-based router. Finally, we evaluate our mechanism using simulations with BRITE generated topologies. The results show that our mechanism can greatly reduce the network configuration complexities.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
For example, it can not protect sub-nets from being reached by a suspicious network
References
Sung Y, Sun X, Rao S, Xie G, Maltz D (2011) Towards systematic design of enterprise networks. Netw IEEE/ACM Trans 19(3):695–708
Oppenheimer D, Ganapathi A, Patterson DA (2003) Why do internet services fail, and what can be done about it? In: Proceedings of USENIX USITS’03, Seattle, WA, Mar 2003
Kerravala Z (2002) Configuration management delivers business resiliency. The Yankee Group
Sun X, Rao SG, Xie GG (2012) Modeling complexity of enterprise routing design. In: Proceedings of ACM CoNEXT’12, Nice, France, Dec 2012
Boot T (2012) Brdp for homenet. Internet Draft, Oct 2012, draft-boot-homenet-brdp-00.txt
Xu M, Wu J, Yang S, Wang D (2012) Two dimensional ip routing architecture. Internet Draft, Mar 2012, draft-xu-rtgwg-twod-ip-routing-00.txt
Coltun R (1998) The OSPF opaque LSA option. RFC 2370 (Standard Track), Internet Engineering Task Force, Jul. 1998
Chown T, Arkko J, Brandt A, Troan O, Weil J (2012) Home networking architecture for ipv6. Internet Draft, Oct 2012, draft-ietf-homenet-arch-06
Zhuang Y, Calvert K (2010) Measuring the effectiveness of hierarchical address assignment. In: Proceedings of IEEE GLOBECOM’10), Anaheim, CA, Dec 2010
Barré S, Bonaventure O (2007) Improved path exploration in shim6-based multihoming. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOM Workshop on IPv6 and the Future of the Internet, Kyoto, Japan, Aug 2007
Baker F, Savola P (2004) Ingress filtering for multihomed networks. RFC 2004 (Best Current Practice), Internet Engineering Task Force, Mar 2004
Patil P, Reddy T, Penno R, Wing D (2012) Using pcp to control nat and firewalls in multihoming. Internet Draft, Oct 2012, draft-patil-pcp-multihoming-00.txt
Sobrinho J (2002) Algebra and algorithms for qos path computation and hop-by-hop routing in the internet. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw (TON) 10:541–550
Lu H, Sahni S (2005) Conflict detection and resolution in two-dimensional prefix router tables. IEEE/ACM Trans Netw 13(6):1353–1363
Quagga routing suite. www.quagga.net
Kohler E, Morris R, Chen B, Jannotti J, Kaashoek MF (2000) The click modular router. ACM Trans Comput Syst 18(3):263–297
Brite: Boston university representative internet topology generator. http://www.cs.bu.edu/brite
Huffaker B, Dhamdhere A, Fomenkov M, Claffy K (2010) Toward topology dualism: improving the accuracy of AS annotations for routers. In: Proceedings of PAM’10, Zurich, Switzerland, Apr 2010
Barford P, Bestavros A, Byers J, Crovella M (2001) On the marginal utility of network topology measurements. In: Proceedings of ACM IMW’01, San Francisco, California, USA, Nov 2001
Dhamdhere A, Dovrolis C (2008) Ten years in the evolution of the internet ecosystem. In: Proceedings of ACM IMC’08, Vouliagmeni, Greece, Oct 2008
Benson T, Akella A, Maltz D (2009) Unraveling the complexity of network management. In: Proceedings of USENIX NSDI’09, ser. NSDI’09. Boston, Massachusetts: USENIX Association, 2009, pp 335–348 [Online]. http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=1558977.1559000
Policy-Based Routing (white paper), Cisco, 1996
Enck W, McDaniel P, Sen S, Sebos P, Spoerel S, Greenberg A, Rao S, Aiello W, Configuration management at massive scale: system design and experience. In: Proceedings of USENIX ATC’07, Santa Clara, CA, June 2007
Estrin D, Li T, Rekhter Y, Varadhan K, Zappala D (1996) Source demand routing: packet format and forwarding specification (Version 1). RFC 1940 (Informational), Internet Engineering Task Force, May 1996
Van der Merwe J, Cepleanu A, D’Souza K, Freeman B, Greenberg A, Knight D, McMillan R, Moloney D, Mulligan J, Nguyen H, Nguyen M, Ramarajan A, Saad S, Satterlee M, Spencer T, Toll D, Zelingher S (2006) Dynamic connectivity management with an intelligent route service control point. In: Proceedings of ACM INM’06, Aug 2006
Ballani H, Francis P (2007) Conman: a step towards network manageability. In: Proceedings of ACM SIGCOMM’07, Kyoto, Japan, Aug 2007
Bagnulo M, García-martínez A, Rodríguez J, Azcorra A, Madrid I (2004) The case for source address dependent routing. In: Multihoming. Proceeding of the First Workshop on QoS Routing, Barcelona, Spain
Multi-topology routing (white paper), Juniper, Aug 2010
Ee CT, Shenker S, Subramanian L (2006) Sapheniea: simplifying configuration using classes. University of California at Berkeley. Technical report, Oct 2006
Boot T (2011) Routing a traffic class. Internet Draft, Jul 2011, draft-baker-fun-routing-class-00.txt
Yang S, Wang D, Xu M, Wu J (2012) Two dimensional router: design and implementation. Tsinghua University. Technical report, Aug 2012. http://www.wdklife.com/tech.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yang, S., He, Y., Xu, M. et al. Towards flexible management in enterprise network: an enhanced routing protocol. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 9, 125–132 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0375-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-015-0375-0