Skip to main content
Log in

Compressive representation based pattern analysis for correlation image

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The definition of the correlation image for digital image is presented to show that the correlation images of different images exhibit distinct texture-like appearances. Then inspired by the universality of the compressive sensing theory which indicates that random measurements can be employed for signals sparse in any basis, the compressive representation for digital image is further defined by employing random matrix as sensing matrix to measure the correlation image. It is found that l vectors of the compressive representation for one image exhibit a highly coherent similarity while display distinct characteristics between different images as well. Thus it shows that one image can be well compressively represented by using one of the l vectors as the feature vector of compressive representation in the sensing (measurement) domain. As data dimension of the feature vector is much less than that of both the original image and the correlation image, it facilitates pattern analysis for its less computational complexity. Application results of face recognition indicate potentiality of the proposed method. Further performance analysis based on tests of the leave-one-out cross-validation, twofold cross-validation as well as analysis of variance shows that the proposed method outperforms the classical PCA on the face recognition tasks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chen CH, Pau LF, Wang PSP (eds) (1998) The handbook of pattern recognition and computer vision, 2nd edn. World Scientific Publishing Corporation, Singapore, pp 207–248

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tuceryan M (1994) Moment based texture segmentation. Pattern Recognit Lett 15:659–668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tuceryan M, Jain AK (1990) Texture segmentation using voronoi polygons. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell PAMI-12:211–216

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lazebnik S, Schmid C, Ponce J (2005) A sparse texture representation using local affine regions. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 27(8):1265–1278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Dohoho D (2006) Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(4):1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Candes E, Romberg J, Tao T (2006) Robust uncertainty principles: exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(4):489–509

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Candes E, Romberg J, Tao T (2007) Near-optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies? IEEE Trans Inf Theory 52(12):5406–5423

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Tsaig Y, Dohoho D (2006) Extensions of compressed sensing. Signal Process 86(3):549–571

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Baraniuk RG (2007) Compressive sensing. IEEE Signal Process Mag 24(4):118–124

  10. Tropp JA, Gilbert AC (2007) Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 53(12):4655–4666

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Baraniuk RG (2014) Compressive sensing eight years after (2004–2012). http://www.ece.rice.edu/~richb/docs/talks/cs-asilomar-nov2012-print.pdf. Retrieved on April 1, 2014

  12. Zhu W, Chen B-X (2013) Novel methods of DOA estimation based on compressed sensing. Multidimens Syst Signal Process. doi:10.1007/s11045-013-0239-2

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wright J, Ma Y, Mairal J, Sapiro G, Huang TS et al (2010) Sparse representation for computer vision and pattern recognition. Proc IEEE 98(6):1031–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wagner A, Wright J, Ganesh A, Zihan Z, Mobahi H et al (2012) Toward a practical face recognition system: robust alignment and illumination by sparse representation. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 34(2):372–386

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Yin J, Liu Z, Jin Z, Yang W (2012) Kernel sparse representation based classification. Neurocomputing 77(1):120–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Mi J-X, Liu J-X (2013) Face recognition using sparse representation-based classification on K-nearest subspace. PLoS One 8(3):e59430:1–11. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0059430

  17. Turk MM, Pentland A (1991) Eigenfaces for recognition. J Cogn Neurosci 3(1):71–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Martínez Aleix M, Kak Avinash C (2001) PCA versus LDA. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell 23(2):228–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhao W, Chellappa R, Phillips PJ, Rosenfeld A (2003) Face recognition: a literature survey. ACM Comput Surv 35(4):399–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Hsieh P-C, Tung P-C (2009) A novel hybrid approach based on sub-pattern technique and whitened PCA for face recognition. Pattern Recognit 42(5):978–984

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Wen Y, He L, Shi P (2012) Face recognition using difference vector plus KPCA. Digit Signal Process 22(1):140–146

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Poon B, Amin MA, Yan H (2011) Performance evaluation and comparison of PCA Based human face recognition methods for distorted images. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 2(4):245–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rahman A, Beg MMS (2014) Face sketch recognition using sketching with words. Int J Mach Learn Cybern. doi:10.1007/s13042-014-0256-y

    Google Scholar 

  24. Amin MA, Yan H (2009) An empirical study on the characteristics of gabor representations for face recognition. Int J Pattern Recognit Artif Intell 23(3):401–431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Amin MA, Yan H (2007) Sign language finger alphabet recognition from Gabor-PCA representation of hand gestures. IEEE Int Conf Machine Learn Cybern 4:2218–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dailey MN, Cottrell GW, Padgett C, Adolphs R (2002) EMPATH: a neural network that categorizes facial expressions. J Cogn Neurosci 14(8):1158–1173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Amin MA, Afzulpurkar NV, Dailey MN, Esichaikul V, Batanov DN (2005) Fuzzy-C-mean determines the principle component pairs to estimate the degree of emotion from facial expressions. In: Wang L, Jin Y (eds) Fuzzy systems and knowledge discovery. Springer, pp 484–493

  28. AT&T Laboratories Cambridge. The database of faces. http://www.cl.cam.ac.uk/research/dtg/attarchive/facedatabase.html. Retrieved on March 1, 2011

  29. Jain V, Mukherjee A (2011) The Indian face database. http://vis-www.cs.umass.edu/~vidit/IndianFaceDatabase. Retrieved on Mar. 1, 2011

  30. Department of Computer Science, Yale University. The Yale face database. http://cvc.yale.edu/projects/yalefaces/yalefaces.html. Retrieved on March 1, 2011

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by Scientific Research Fund of Hunan Provincial Science and Technology Department (2013GK3090), China. The author would like to extend his appreciation to the editor(s) and anonymous reviewers for their valuable comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zong-chang Yang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, Zc. Compressive representation based pattern analysis for correlation image. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 9, 359–370 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0511-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-016-0511-5

Keywords

Navigation