Skip to main content
Log in

Quality disclosure with information value under competition

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, a new influence factor, called information value, is introduced to examine the question of voluntary quality disclosure. As a benchmark, we first consider a monopolistic case. The seller’s equilibrium disclosure strategy and ex ante utility are obtained, respectively. The result shows that the information value is of special stimulation to sellers disclosure, since it can counteract the disclosure cost partly. Then two duopoly cases, containing a simultaneous disclosure case and a sequential disclosure case, are considered, respectively. The result indicates that the seller discloses less information than that in the monopolistic case due to competition. Moreover, compared to the simultaneous disclosure case, in the sequential disclosure case, competition is softened and both sellers’ utilities and the social welfare are improved, but at the cost of sacrificing the consumer’s surplus. Benefiting from the competition, the social welfare and the consumer’s surplus are both bigger than that in the monopolistic case, yet the seller’s utility is smaller.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ashfaq RAR, Wang XZ, Huang JZX, Abbas H, He YL (2017) Fuzziness based semi-supervised learning approach for intrusion detection system. Inf Sci 378:484–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bawa K, Shoemaker R (2004) The effects of free sample promotions on incremental brand sales. Mark Sci 23(3):345–363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Board O (2009) Competition and disclosure. J Ind Econ 57(1):197–213

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Caldieraro F, Shin D, Stivers A (2011) Voluntary quality disclosure under price-signaling competition. Manag Decis Econ 32(8):493–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cheong I, Kim JY (2004) Costly information disclosure in oligopoly. J Ind Econ 52(1):121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Manag Sci 54(3):477–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Daughety AF, Reinganum JF (2008) Communicating quality: a unified model of disclosure and signaling. Rand J Econ 39(4):973–989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manag Sci 49(10):1401–1424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Farrell J (1986) Voluntary disclosure: robustness of the unravelling result. In: Grieson R (ed) Antitrust and regulation. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 91–103

    Google Scholar 

  10. Fishman MJ, Hagerty KM (2003) Mandatory versus voluntary disclosure in markets with informed and uninformed customers. J Law Econ Org 19(1):45–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Grossman SJ (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J Law Econ 24(3):416–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1980) Disclosure laws and takeover bids. J Finance 35(2):323–334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Guo L, Zhao Y (2009) Voluntary quality disclosure and market interaction. Mark Sci 28(3):488–501

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  14. Guo L (2009) Quality disclosure formats in a distribution channel. Manag Sci 55(9):1513–1526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. He YL, Wang XZ, Huang JZX (2016) Fuzzy nonlinear regression analysis using a random weight network. Inf Sci 364–365:222–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. He YL, Liu JNK, Hu YH, Wang XZ (2015) OWA operator based link prediction ensemble for social network. Expert Syst Appl 42(1):21–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hotz VJ, Xiao M (2013) Strategic information disclosure: the case of multi-attribute products with heterogeneous consumers. Econ Inq 51(1):865–881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Janssen M, Roy S (2011) Strategic disclosure and signaling of product quality with price competition. Working paper

  19. Jovanovic B (1982) Truthful disclosure of information. Bell J Econ 13(1):36–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Levin D, Peck J, Ye L (2009) Quality disclosure and competition. J Ind Econ 57(1):169–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Matthews S, Postlewaite A (1985) Quality testing and disclosure. Rand J Econ 16(3):328–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mayzlin D (2006) Promotional chat on the Internet. Market Sci 25(2):155–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Milgrom PR (1981) Good news and bad news representation theorems and applications. Bell J Econ 12(2):380–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Okuno-Fujiwara M, Postlewaite A, Suzumura K (1990) Strategic information revelation. Rev Econ Stud 57(1):25–47

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Shavell S (1994) Acquisition and disclosure of information prior to sale. Rand J Econ 25(1):20–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stivers AE (2004) Unraveling of information: competition and uncertainty. BE J Theor Econ 4(1):1–9

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. Viscusi WK (1978) A note on lemons markets with quality certification. Bell J Econ 9(1):277–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu J, Zhai X, Zhang C, Liu X (2011) Sharing quality information in a dual-supplier network: a game theoretic perspective. Int J Prod Res 49(1):199–214

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang XZ (2015) Learning from big data with uncertainty-editorial. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(5):2329–2330

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. Wang XZ, Ashfaq R, Fu A (2015) Fuzziness based sample categorization for classifier performance improvement. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(3):1185–1196

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Xiao T, Yang D, Shen H (2011) Coordinating a supply chain with a quality assurance policy via a revenue-sharing contract. Int J Prod Res 9(1):277–279

    MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported partially by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71301114, 71271151 and 71471126, the Research Fund for the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education under Grant No. 20130032110015 and the Projects of the Humanity and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China under Grant No. 13YJA630065.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jin Peng.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lan, Y., Peng, J., Wang, F. et al. Quality disclosure with information value under competition. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 9, 1489–1503 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0658-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0658-8

Keywords

Navigation