Abstract
In this paper, a new influence factor, called information value, is introduced to examine the question of voluntary quality disclosure. As a benchmark, we first consider a monopolistic case. The seller’s equilibrium disclosure strategy and ex ante utility are obtained, respectively. The result shows that the information value is of special stimulation to sellers disclosure, since it can counteract the disclosure cost partly. Then two duopoly cases, containing a simultaneous disclosure case and a sequential disclosure case, are considered, respectively. The result indicates that the seller discloses less information than that in the monopolistic case due to competition. Moreover, compared to the simultaneous disclosure case, in the sequential disclosure case, competition is softened and both sellers’ utilities and the social welfare are improved, but at the cost of sacrificing the consumer’s surplus. Benefiting from the competition, the social welfare and the consumer’s surplus are both bigger than that in the monopolistic case, yet the seller’s utility is smaller.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ashfaq RAR, Wang XZ, Huang JZX, Abbas H, He YL (2017) Fuzziness based semi-supervised learning approach for intrusion detection system. Inf Sci 378:484–497
Bawa K, Shoemaker R (2004) The effects of free sample promotions on incremental brand sales. Mark Sci 23(3):345–363
Board O (2009) Competition and disclosure. J Ind Econ 57(1):197–213
Caldieraro F, Shin D, Stivers A (2011) Voluntary quality disclosure under price-signaling competition. Manag Decis Econ 32(8):493–504
Cheong I, Kim JY (2004) Costly information disclosure in oligopoly. J Ind Econ 52(1):121–132
Chen Y, Xie J (2008) Online consumer review: word-of-mouth as a new element of marketing communication mix. Manag Sci 54(3):477–491
Daughety AF, Reinganum JF (2008) Communicating quality: a unified model of disclosure and signaling. Rand J Econ 39(4):973–989
Dellarocas C (2003) The digitization of word of mouth: promise and challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Manag Sci 49(10):1401–1424
Farrell J (1986) Voluntary disclosure: robustness of the unravelling result. In: Grieson R (ed) Antitrust and regulation. Lexington Books, Lanham, pp 91–103
Fishman MJ, Hagerty KM (2003) Mandatory versus voluntary disclosure in markets with informed and uninformed customers. J Law Econ Org 19(1):45–63
Grossman SJ (1981) The informational role of warranties and private disclosure about product quality. J Law Econ 24(3):416–483
Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1980) Disclosure laws and takeover bids. J Finance 35(2):323–334
Guo L, Zhao Y (2009) Voluntary quality disclosure and market interaction. Mark Sci 28(3):488–501
Guo L (2009) Quality disclosure formats in a distribution channel. Manag Sci 55(9):1513–1526
He YL, Wang XZ, Huang JZX (2016) Fuzzy nonlinear regression analysis using a random weight network. Inf Sci 364–365:222–240
He YL, Liu JNK, Hu YH, Wang XZ (2015) OWA operator based link prediction ensemble for social network. Expert Syst Appl 42(1):21–50
Hotz VJ, Xiao M (2013) Strategic information disclosure: the case of multi-attribute products with heterogeneous consumers. Econ Inq 51(1):865–881
Janssen M, Roy S (2011) Strategic disclosure and signaling of product quality with price competition. Working paper
Jovanovic B (1982) Truthful disclosure of information. Bell J Econ 13(1):36–44
Levin D, Peck J, Ye L (2009) Quality disclosure and competition. J Ind Econ 57(1):169–196
Matthews S, Postlewaite A (1985) Quality testing and disclosure. Rand J Econ 16(3):328–340
Mayzlin D (2006) Promotional chat on the Internet. Market Sci 25(2):155–163
Milgrom PR (1981) Good news and bad news representation theorems and applications. Bell J Econ 12(2):380–391
Okuno-Fujiwara M, Postlewaite A, Suzumura K (1990) Strategic information revelation. Rev Econ Stud 57(1):25–47
Shavell S (1994) Acquisition and disclosure of information prior to sale. Rand J Econ 25(1):20–36
Stivers AE (2004) Unraveling of information: competition and uncertainty. BE J Theor Econ 4(1):1–9
Viscusi WK (1978) A note on lemons markets with quality certification. Bell J Econ 9(1):277–279
Wu J, Zhai X, Zhang C, Liu X (2011) Sharing quality information in a dual-supplier network: a game theoretic perspective. Int J Prod Res 49(1):199–214
Wang XZ (2015) Learning from big data with uncertainty-editorial. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 28(5):2329–2330
Wang XZ, Ashfaq R, Fu A (2015) Fuzziness based sample categorization for classifier performance improvement. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 29(3):1185–1196
Xiao T, Yang D, Shen H (2011) Coordinating a supply chain with a quality assurance policy via a revenue-sharing contract. Int J Prod Res 9(1):277–279
Acknowledgements
This work was supported partially by the Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 71301114, 71271151 and 71471126, the Research Fund for the Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education under Grant No. 20130032110015 and the Projects of the Humanity and Social Science Foundation of Ministry of Education of China under Grant No. 13YJA630065.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lan, Y., Peng, J., Wang, F. et al. Quality disclosure with information value under competition. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 9, 1489–1503 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0658-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-017-0658-8