Skip to main content
Log in

Geometric aggregation operators with interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy numbers based on Einstein operations and their application in group decision making

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of Machine Learning and Cybernetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate information aggregation methods under interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy environment. Some Einstein operational laws on interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy numbers are defined based on Einstein sum and Einstein product. Based on Einstein operations, we define interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy aggregation operators, such as interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric operator, interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy Einstein ordered weighted geometric operator and interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy Einstein hybrid geometric operator. Furthermore, we apply the proposed aggregation operators to deal with multiple attribute group decision making problem. Finally we construct a numerical example for multiple attribute group decision making problem and compare the result with existing methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atanassov KT (1986) Intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 20(1):87–96

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Atanassov KT (1996) An equality between intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Fuzzy Sets Syst 79(2):257–258

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Ban AI, Tuse DA (2014) Trapezoidal/triangular intuitionistic fuzzy numbers versus interval-valued trapezoidal/triangular fuzzy numbers and applications to multicriteria decision making methods. In: International conference on intuitionistic fuzzy sets, Sofia, pp 10–11

  4. Ban A (2008) Trapezoidal approximations of intuitionistic fuzzy numbers expressed by value, ambiguity, width and weighted expected value. Notes Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets 14(1):38–47

    Google Scholar 

  5. Chen TY (2018) An interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy outranking method with a closeness-based assignment model for multiple criteria decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(1):126–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Deschrijver G, Kerre EE (2002) A generalization of operators on intuitionistic fuzzy sets using triangular norms and conorms. Notes Intuitionistic Fuzzy Sets 8(1):19–27

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Garg H (2016) A new generalized pythagorean fuzzy information aggregation using einstein operations and its application to decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(9):886–920

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jianqiang W, Zhong Z (2009) Aggregation operators on intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number and its application to multi-criteria decision making problems. J Syst Eng Electron 20(2):321–326

    Google Scholar 

  9. Liang X, Wei C (2014) An Atanassov’s intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision making method based on entropy and similarity measure. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 5(3):435–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Liang D, Zhang Y, Xu Z, Darko AP (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy Bonferroni mean aggregation operator and its accelerative calculating algorithm with the multithreading. Int J Intell Syst 33(3):615–633

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Liang D, Xu Z, Liu D, Wu Y (2018) Method for three-way decisions using ideal TOPSIS solutions at pythagorean fuzzy information. Inf Sci 435:282–295

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu Y, Qin Y, Han Y (2018) Multiple criteria decision making with probabilities in interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy setting. Int J Fuzzy Syst 20(2):558–571

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  13. Lowen R (1996) Fuzzy real numbers. In: Lowen R (ed) Fuzzy set theory. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 143–168

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  14. Peng X, Yang Y (2015) Some results for Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 30(11):1133–1160

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  15. Rahman K, Abdullah S, Husain F, Khan MA, Shakeel M (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy ordered weighted geometric aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. J Appl Environ Biol Sci 7(4):67–83

    Google Scholar 

  16. Rahman K, Khan MA, Ullah M, Fahmi A (2017) Multiple attribute group decision making for plant location selection with Pythagorean fuzzy weighted geometric aggregation operator. Nucleus 54(1):66–74

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rahman K, Abdullah S, Ahmed R, Ullah M (2017) Pythagorean fuzzy Einstein weighted geometric aggregation operator and their application to multiple attribute group decision making. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 33(1):635–647

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. Rahman K, Abdullah S, Shakeel M, Khan MSA, Ullah M (2017) Interval-valued Pythagorean fuzzy geometric aggregation operators and their application to group decision making problem. Cogent Math Stat 4(1):1338638

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Shakeel M, Abdullah S, Khan MSA, Rahman K (2018) Averaging aggregation operators with interval Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. Punjab Univ J Math 50(2):147–170

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  20. Wan SP, Dong JY (2010) Method of intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy number for multi-attribute group decision. Control Decis 25(5):773–776

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  21. Wan SP (2013) Power average operators of trapezoidal intuitionistic fuzzy numbers and application to multi-attribute group decision making. Appl Math Model 37(6):4112–4126

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Wang J, Zhang Z (2009) Multi-criteria decision-making method with incomplete certain information based on intuitionistic fuzzy number. Control Decis 24(2):226–230

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang W, Liu X (2011) Intuitionistic fuzzy geometric aggregation operators based on Einstein operations. Int J Intell Syst 26(11):1049–1075

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wang W, Liu X (2012) Intuitionistic fuzzy information aggregation using Einstein operations. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 20(5):923–938

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Wei G, Lu M (2018) Pythagorean fuzzy power aggregation operators in multiple attribute decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(1):169–186

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Wei G (2010) Some arithmetic aggregation operators with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers and their application to group decision making. J Comput 5(3):345–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Wu J, Cao QW (2013) Same families of geometric aggregation operators with intuitionistic trapezoidal fuzzy numbers. Appl Math Model 37(1–2):318–327

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  28. Xu Z (2005) An overview of methods for determining OWA weights. Int J Intell Syst 20(8):843–865

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Xu Z, Yager RR (2006) Some geometric aggregation operators based on intuitionistic fuzzy sets. Int J Gen Syst 35(4):417–433

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Xu Z (2007) Intuitionistic fuzzy aggregation operators. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 15(6):1179–1187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yager RR (2013) Pythagorean fuzzy subsets. In: IFSA world congress and NAFIPS annual meeting (IFSA/NAFIPS) IEE, Joint, pp 57–61

  32. Yager RR, Abbasov AM (2013) Pythagorean membership grades, complex numbers, and decision making. Int J Intell Syst 28(5):436–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yager RR (2014) Pythagorean membership grades in multicriteria decision making. IEEE Trans Fuzzy Syst 22(4):958–965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Zadeh LA (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(3):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Zeng S, Mu Z, Baležentis T (2018) A novel aggregation method for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple attribute group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 33(3):573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhao X, Wei G (2013) Some intuitionistic fuzzy Einstein hybrid aggregation operators and their application to multiple attribute decision making. Knowl Based Syst 37:472–479

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang S, Yu D (2014) Some geometric Choquet aggregation operators using Einstein operations under intuitionistic fuzzy environment. J Intell Fuzzy Syst 26(1):491–500

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhang X, Xu Z (2014) Extension of TOPSIS to multiple criteria decision making with Pythagorean fuzzy sets. Int J Intell Syst 29(12):1061–1078

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  39. Zhao S, Liang C, Zhang J (2015) Some intuitionistic trepozoidal aggregation fuzzy aggregation operators based on Einstein operations and their application in multiple attribute group decision making. Int J Mach Learn Cybern 8(2):547–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang X (2016) Multicriteria Pythagorean fuzzy decision analysis: a hierarchical QUALIFLEX approach with the closeness index-based ranking methods. Inf Sci 330:104–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Zhang X (2016) A novel approach based on similarity measure for Pythagorean fuzzy multiple criteria group decision making. Int J Intell Syst 31(6):593–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Shakeel.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shakeel, M., Abdullah, S., Shahzad, M. et al. Geometric aggregation operators with interval-valued Pythagorean trapezoidal fuzzy numbers based on Einstein operations and their application in group decision making. Int. J. Mach. Learn. & Cyber. 10, 2867–2886 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-00909-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13042-018-00909-y

Keywords

Navigation