Skip to main content
Log in

Generalized hybrid approach to adjoint code derivation for efficient uncertainty and reliability studies

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We investigate a generalized hybrid adjoint procedure for deriving the adjoint code for efficient sensitivity analysis and uncertainty propagation. The hybrid approach is a combination of generalized adjoint equations at higher level and automatic differentiation at subroutine level. The procedure developed is studied for implementation issues for the problem of uncertainty propagation in natural convection heat transport system temperature evolution. The results obtained by this method is validated by finite difference computation. The results demonstrate that for this application reasonably accurate results can be obtained efficiently by the proposed methodology compared to direct Monte-Carlo with response surface methodology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • IAEA (2005) Natural circulation in water cooled nuclear power plants; phenomena, models and methodology for system reliability assessments. Technical Report IAEA-TECDOC-1474, IAEA, Vienna, Austria, 2005

  • Mousavian SK, Misale M, D’Auria F, Salehi MA (2004) Transient and stability analysis in single-phase natural circulation. Ann Nucl Energy 31:1177–1198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oblow EM (1978) Sensitivity theory for reactor thermal-hydraulics problems. Nucl Sci Eng 68:322–337

    Google Scholar 

  • Parks CV, Maudlin PJ (1981) Application of sensitivity theory to a neutronic/thermal hydraulic reactor safety code. Nucl Technol 54(12):38–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Cacuci DG (2003) Sensitivity and uncertainty Analysis, vol 1. Chapman and Hall, Boca Raton

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Marques M, Pignatel JF, D’Auria F, Burgazzi L, Mauller C, Cojazzi G, La Lumia V (2002) Reliability methods for passive safety functions. In: Proceedings of the international conference ICONE, vol 10. pp 14–18

  • Burgazzi L, Fiorini GL, De Magistris F (1998) Reliability assessment of passive safety systems. In: Proceedings of the 6th international conference on nuclear engineering-ICONE 6, S. Diego, 1998

  • D’Auria F, Camargo C, Mazzantini O (2012) The best estimate plus uncertainty (BEPU) approach in licensing of current nuclear reactors. Nucl Sci Eng 248:317–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalos MH, Whitlock PA (1997) Monte Carlo methods, 2nd edn. WILEY, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Antoulas AC (2005) Approximation of large-scale dynamical systems. Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, Philadelphia

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew C Michael, Brown Steve, Christianson Bruce, Laurence C, Dixon W (2000) Automatic differentiation of algorithms. J Comput Appl Math 124(1–2):171–190

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • John Arul A, Kannan Iyer, Velusamy K (2010) Efficient reliability estimate of passive thermal hydraulic safety system with automatic differentiation. Nucl Eng Des 240(10):2768–2778

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author thanks Dr. P. Chellapandi, director RDG, for his encouragement and support during the course of this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. John Arul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arul, A.J., Iyer, K. & Verma, A.K. Generalized hybrid approach to adjoint code derivation for efficient uncertainty and reliability studies. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 6, 172–182 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0265-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-014-0265-y

Keywords

Navigation